Paper · 2022 · Indonesian Journal of Agricultural Research

1-Methylcyclopropene and Ethephon Effects on 'Carabao' Mango Fruits Harvested at Different Stages of Fruit Maturity

Bryl Manigo; Narlyn Antibo

12
claims
29
verbatim quotes
5
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Three experiments were conducted using three different stages of fruit maturity (100, 105, and 110 DAFI or days after flower induction) of ‘Carabao’ mangoes harvested from the same set of trees. Fruits harvested were applied with 1-MCP [(dosage:0.5 µL/L) via gas exposure for 20 hours and spraying], and ethephon (dipping at 1ml/L of H2O) applied singly or in combination. Mangoes were then stored in ambient room conditions [29.2±1.6°C, 69.88±4.0% relative humidity (RH)]. Mango fruits with 1-MCP treatment applied through gas exposure at 0.5 µL/L consistently delayed the peel color change, firmness, and weight loss of harvested fruits at 100, 105 and 110 DAFI. These fruits held its shelf life for 15 (100 DAFI), 12 (105 DAFI) and 9 (110 DAFI) days compared to control with 12, 10 and 8 days respectively. Furthermore, all treatments showed varied effects on the visual quality of fruits regardless of its maturity. It also appeared that fruits at 105 DAFI treated with ethephon alone have better taste while other organoleptic attributes, chemical properties (TSS, TTA and pH), as well as the disease incidence and severity were found to be comparable. This further proved that 1-MCP delays ripening of fruits but could not prevent disease occurrence.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gaseous 1-MCP delayed peel color change in mangoes at all three harvest maturities.

Taxon
mangoesMangifera indicae1
Material
‘Carabao’e1
Treatment
1-MCP treatment applied through gas exposure at 0.5 µL/Le0
Outcome
peel color changee0
Direction
delayede0
Qualifier
100, 105 and 110 DAFIe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mango fruits with 1-MCP treatment applied through gas exposure at 0.5 µL/L consistently delayed the peel color change, firmness, and weight loss of harvested fruits at 100, 105 and 110 DAFI.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–664 · show in text ↑
e1

“‘Carabao’ mangoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–156 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gaseous 1-MCP delayed firmness change in mangoes at all three harvest maturities.

Taxon
mangoesMangifera indicae1
Material
‘Carabao’e1
Treatment
1-MCP treatment applied through gas exposure at 0.5 µL/Le0
Outcome
firmnesse0
Direction
delayede0
Qualifier
100, 105 and 110 DAFIe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mango fruits with 1-MCP treatment applied through gas exposure at 0.5 µL/L consistently delayed the peel color change, firmness, and weight loss of harvested fruits at 100, 105 and 110 DAFI.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–664 · show in text ↑
e1

“‘Carabao’ mangoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–156 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gaseous 1-MCP delayed weight loss in mangoes at all three harvest maturities.

Taxon
mangoesMangifera indicae1
Material
‘Carabao’e1
Treatment
1-MCP treatment applied through gas exposure at 0.5 µL/Le0
Outcome
weight losse0
Direction
delayede0
Qualifier
100, 105 and 110 DAFIe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mango fruits with 1-MCP treatment applied through gas exposure at 0.5 µL/L consistently delayed the peel color change, firmness, and weight loss of harvested fruits at 100, 105 and 110 DAFI.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–664 · show in text ↑
e1

“‘Carabao’ mangoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–156 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 100 DAFI, 1-MCP extended mango shelf life to 15 days versus 12 days for controls.

Taxon
mangoesMangifera indicae2
Treatment
1-MCP treatment applied through gas exposure at 0.5 µL/Le1
Outcome
shelf lifee0
Direction
comparede0
Value
15 (100 DAFI)e0
Qualifier
12, 10 and 8 days respectivelye0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These fruits held its shelf life for 15 (100 DAFI), 12 (105 DAFI) and 9 (110 DAFI) days compared to control with 12, 10 and 8 days respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–809 · show in text ↑
e1

“1-MCP treatment applied through gas exposure at 0.5 µL/L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–548 · show in text ↑
e2

“‘Carabao’ mangoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–156 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 105 DAFI, 1-MCP extended mango shelf life to 12 days versus 10 days for controls.

Taxon
mangoesMangifera indicae2
Treatment
1-MCP treatment applied through gas exposure at 0.5 µL/Le1
Outcome
shelf lifee0
Direction
comparede0
Value
12 (105 DAFI)e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These fruits held its shelf life for 15 (100 DAFI), 12 (105 DAFI) and 9 (110 DAFI) days compared to control with 12, 10 and 8 days respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–809 · show in text ↑
e1

“1-MCP treatment applied through gas exposure at 0.5 µL/L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–548 · show in text ↑
e2

“‘Carabao’ mangoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–156 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 110 DAFI, 1-MCP extended mango shelf life to 9 days versus 8 days for controls.

Taxon
mangoesMangifera indicae2
Treatment
1-MCP treatment applied through gas exposure at 0.5 µL/Le1
Outcome
shelf lifee0
Direction
comparede0
Value
9 (110 DAFI)e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These fruits held its shelf life for 15 (100 DAFI), 12 (105 DAFI) and 9 (110 DAFI) days compared to control with 12, 10 and 8 days respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–809 · show in text ↑
e1

“1-MCP treatment applied through gas exposure at 0.5 µL/L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–548 · show in text ↑
e2

“‘Carabao’ mangoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–156 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments had varied effects on fruit visual quality across maturity stages.

Taxon
mangoesMangifera indicae1
Treatment
all treatmentse0
Outcome
visual quality of fruitse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all treatments showed varied effects on the visual quality of fruits regardless of its maturity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–919 · show in text ↑
e1

“‘Carabao’ mangoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–156 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon alone appeared to improve taste in mangoes harvested at 105 DAFI.

Taxon
mangoesMangifera indicae1
Treatment
ethephon alonee0
Outcome
tastee0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
105 DAFIe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruits at 105 DAFI treated with ethephon alone have better taste”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1006 · show in text ↑
e1

“‘Carabao’ mangoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–156 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other organoleptic attributes and chemical properties were comparable across treatments.

Taxon
mangoesMangifera indicae1
Treatment
applied singly or in combinatione2
Outcome
other organoleptic attributes, chemical properties (TSS, TTA and pH)e0
Direction
comparablee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“other organoleptic attributes, chemical properties (TSS, TTA and pH), as well as the disease incidence and severity were found to be comparable.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1157 · show in text ↑
e1

“‘Carabao’ mangoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–156 · show in text ↑
e2

“applied singly or in combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 339–371 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease incidence and severity were comparable across treatments.

Taxon
mangoesMangifera indicae1
Treatment
applied singly or in combinatione2
Outcome
disease incidence and severitye0
Direction
comparablee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“disease incidence and severity were found to be comparable.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1157 · show in text ↑
e1

“‘Carabao’ mangoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–156 · show in text ↑
e2

“applied singly or in combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 339–371 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that 1-MCP delayed mango ripening.

Taxon
mangoesMangifera indicae1
Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
ripening of fruitse0
Direction
delayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1-MCP delays ripening of fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1214 · show in text ↑
e1

“‘Carabao’ mangoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–156 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that 1-MCP could not prevent disease occurrence.

Taxon
mangoesMangifera indicae1
Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
disease occurrencee0
Direction
could not prevente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1-MCP delays ripening of fruits but could not prevent disease occurrence.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1256 · show in text ↑
e1

“‘Carabao’ mangoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–156 · show in text ↑

1-methylcyclopropene · quality: postharvest · Mangifera indica (mango)Results differ

36 papers: 35 positive, 1 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · disease · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · quality: general · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.