Paper · 2022 · Asian Research Journal of Agriculture

Combined Effect of Nitrogen Fertilization and Seeding Rate on Regional Wheat Yield and Yield Components in Bangladesh

Kishore Kumar Sarker; Mozammel Hoque; Akhi Paul Chowdhury

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Seed rate and nitrogen fertilization are two main critical factors that affect wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) growth and yield. But a little knowledge on the interaction effects of these two factors in wheat cultivation under course, strong acidic nutrient deficit soil condition aimed us to conduct this research. We grew wheat at the field laboratory of the department of Agronomy and Haor Agriculture, Sylhet Agricultural University, Sylhet-3100, Bangladesh, during crop growing period (November-March) of wheat 2021-2022 with split plot design assigning seed rate (100, 120, 140 & 160 kg ha-1) in main plot and nitrogen fertilizer (0, 120, 140, 160 & 180 kg ha-1) in sub plot. The maximum grain yield (3.0 t ha-1) was obtained at 140 kg ha-1 and 160 kg ha-1 seeding rate and nitrogen fertilization respectively. Whereas, the minimum grain yield (1.5 t ha-1) was recorded in control treatment (100 kg ha-1 seed with zero nitrogen). The highest value of the entire yield contributing parameters i.e. effective tillers plant-1 (2.9), spike length (14.7 cm), spikelet spike-1 (17.0), florets spike-1 (52.3), grain spike-1 (51.0) and 1000 seed weight (42.6 g) were recorded at 140 kg ha-1 and 160 kg ha-1 seeding rate and nitrogen fertilization respectively and the values were increased with the increase of seeding rate and nitrogen fertilization rate upto 140 kg ha-1 and 160 kg ha-1 respectively then declined. The growth parameter i.e. plant height (114.1 cm) increased with the increase of seeding rate 160 kg ha-1 and nitrogen fertilization upto 160 kg ha-1 and the minimum value (54.1 cm) was recorded at control treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield peaked at 3.0 t ha-1 with 140 kg ha-1 seed and 160 kg ha-1 nitrogen.

Treatment
140 kg ha-1 and 160 kg ha-1 seeding rate and nitrogen fertilizatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
3.0 t ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum grain yield (3.0 t ha-1) was obtained at 140 kg ha-1 and 160 kg ha-1 seeding rate and nitrogen fertilization respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–812 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control grain yield was the minimum, 1.5 t ha-1.

Treatment
100 kg ha-1 seed with zero nitrogene0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
minimume0
Value
1.5 t ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the minimum grain yield (1.5 t ha-1) was recorded in control treatment (100 kg ha-1 seed with zero nitrogen)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–931 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Effective tillers peaked at 2.9 under the 140 seed and 160 nitrogen rates.

Treatment
140 kg ha-1 and 160 kg ha-1 seeding rate and nitrogen fertilizatione0
Outcome
effective tillers plant-1e0
Value
2.9e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effective tillers plant-1 (2.9), spike length (14.7 cm), spikelet spike-1 (17.0), florets spike-1 (52.3), grain spike-1 (51.0) and 1000 seed weight (42.6 g) were recorded at 140 kg ha-1 and 160 kg ha-1 seeding rate and nitrogen fertilization respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1254 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spike length peaked at 14.7 cm.

Outcome
spike lengthe0
Value
14.7 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spike length (14.7 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1055 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spikelets per spike peaked at 17.0.

Outcome
spikelet spike-1e0
Value
17.0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spikelet spike-1 (17.0)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1080 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Florets per spike peaked at 52.3.

Outcome
florets spike-1e0
Value
52.3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“florets spike-1 (52.3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1104 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grains per spike peaked at 51.0.

Outcome
grain spike-1e0
Value
51.0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain spike-1 (51.0)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1126 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thousand seed weight peaked at 42.6 g.

Outcome
1000 seed weighte0
Value
42.6 ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1000 seed weight (42.6 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1156 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height reached 114.1 cm as seeding and nitrogen rates increased.

Treatment
seeding rate 160 kg ha-1 and nitrogen fertilization upto 160 kg ha-1e0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
114.1 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant height (114.1 cm) increased with the increase of seeding rate 160 kg ha-1 and nitrogen fertilization upto 160 kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1438–1561 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control plants had the minimum height of 54.1 cm.

Outcome
minimum valuee0
Value
54.1 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the minimum value (54.1 cm) was recorded at control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1566–1627 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–82 · show in text ↑

density · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

110 papers: 81 positive, 29 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

106 papers more in this group

See all 110 papers →

density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

498 papers: 376 positive, 122 negative or no effect

375 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

494 papers more in this group

See all 498 papers →

fertilization · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

755 papers: 663 positive, 92 negative or no effect

662 papers in the same direction as this paper · 89 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

751 papers more in this group

See all 755 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.