Paper · 2018 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Effect of rock phosphate based compost and biofertilizer on uptake of nutrients, nutrient use efficiency and yield of cotton

Muhammad Arif; Wazir Ahmed; Tanveer-Ul-Haq; et al.

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Phosphorus deficiency in alkaline and calcareous soils is a worldwide burning issue. The use of mineral phosphatic fertilizers is quite popular throughout the world to cope with this deficiency. However, efficient use of these phosphatic fertilizers is still questionable. A study was conducted to improve the efficiency of these mineral phosphatic fertilizers using phosphorus-solubilizing bacteria (PSB) and phosphorus enriched compost (PEC) in cotton. Results showed that integrated use of PSB and PEC in different combinations improved nutrient use efficiency, growth and seed-cotton yield compared to alone application of single super phosphate (SSP). Significant improvement in morphological characteristics of cotton were recorded due to combinations of PSB and PEC with SSP.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated use of phosphorus-solubilizing bacteria and phosphorus-enriched compost improved cotton nutrient use efficiency, growth and seed-cotton yield compared with single superphosphate alone.

Treatment
integrated use of PSB and PECe1
Interactor
phosphorus-solubilizing bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
nutrient use efficiency, growth and seed-cotton yielde1
Direction
improvede1
Comparator
alone application of single super phosphate (SSP)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using phosphorus-solubilizing bacteria (PSB) and phosphorus enriched compost (PEC) in cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–453 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results showed that integrated use of PSB and PEC in different combinations improved nutrient use efficiency, growth and seed-cotton yield compared to alone application of single super phosphate (SSP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–655 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combinations of phosphorus-solubilizing bacteria and phosphorus-enriched compost with superphosphate gave significant improvement in cotton morphological characteristics.

Treatment
combinations of PSB and PEC with SSPe2
Interactor
phosphorus-solubilizing bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
morphological characteristicse2
Direction
improvemente2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using phosphorus-solubilizing bacteria (PSB) and phosphorus enriched compost (PEC) in cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–453 · show in text ↑
e2

“Significant improvement in morphological characteristics of cotton were recorded due to combinations of PSB and PEC with SSP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–781 · show in text ↑

inoculation · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

50 papers: 46 positive, 4 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

104 papers: 95 positive, 9 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

100 papers more in this group

See all 104 papers →

fertilization · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 497 positive, 53 negative or no effect

496 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.