Paper · 2022 · Indian Journal of Experimental Biology

Relative performance of wheat genotypes under individual and combined water deficit and salinity stress

19
claims
37
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Ascertaining the genetic variability and its relationships among valuable genetic resources is important for crop improvement programme. Here, we assessed the response of eleven wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes using cluster and principal component analysis (PCA) based on morphophysiological data and yield under nine different environments. Wheat genotype WH 1080 maintained higher photosynthetic efficiency under individual stress of 50% water deficit (drought) and 100 mM NaCl (salt), whereas under interactive stresses KRL 370 and KRL 283 were found to be the best genotypes. The highest value of Na+/K+ ratio in shoots was recorded for WH 1080 (1.167) and lowest in KRL 283 (0.612) under combined stresses. Proline accumulation was maximum in KRL 330 (3.17 mg g-1 FW) and minimum in KRL 283 (2.8 mg g-1 FW). Significantly higher reduction (73.4%) was observed in HD 2009 for grain weight/plant at 100 mM NaCl + 50% WD stress treatment whereas minimum reduction of 39.18% was recorded in KRL 370 in comparison to the control treatment. The PCA showed that the first three components comprising about 91% of the total variation for which the variables were analyzed. AMMI model revealed KRL 210 to be stable genotype as being close to center on biplot. E5 environment (100 mM NaCl) was most stable followed by E9 (50% WD + 100 mM NaCl). HD 2888, C-306, HD 2851 and HD 2009 were having positive interaction with E1 (Control) whereas WH 1080 had positive interaction with water deficit environments i.e. E2 and E3 (25 and 50% WD) while KRL 433 had highest positive interaction with combined water deficit and salt stress environments E6, E7, E8 and E9, followed by KRL 370. Similarly, KRL 283, KRL 330, KRL 210 and Kharchia 65 had high positive interaction with saline environments E4 and E5. Findings of the experiment would be beneficial to wheat breeders, specifically the location-specific promising genotypes could possibly be used to develop/breed MAGIC populations to tag genes/alleles conferring drought and salinity tolerance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat genotype WH 1080 maintained higher photosynthetic efficiency under individual water deficit and salt stress.

Material
WH 1080e1
Treatment
individual stress of 50% water deficit (drought) and 100 mM NaCl (salt)e1
Outcome
photosynthetic efficiencye1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Relative performance of wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat genotype WH 1080 maintained higher photosynthetic efficiency under individual stress of 50% water deficit (drought) and 100 mM NaCl (salt)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–493 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under interactive stresses, KRL 370 and KRL 283 were the best wheat genotypes.

Material
KRL 370 and KRL 283e1
Treatment
interactive stressese1
Outcome
best genotypese1
Direction
beste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Relative performance of wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
e1

“under interactive stresses KRL 370 and KRL 283 were found to be the best genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–585 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under combined stresses, the shoot Na+/K+ ratio was highest in WH 1080 (1.167).

Material
WH 1080e1
Organ / stage
shootse1
Treatment
combined stressese1
Outcome
Na+/K+ ratioe1
Direction
higheste1
Value
1.167e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Relative performance of wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest value of Na+/K+ ratio in shoots was recorded for WH 1080 (1.167) and lowest in KRL 283 (0.612) under combined stresses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–717 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under combined stresses, the shoot Na+/K+ ratio was lowest in KRL 283 (0.612).

Material
KRL 283e1
Organ / stage
shootse1
Treatment
combined stressese1
Outcome
Na+/K+ ratioe1
Direction
loweste1
Value
0.612e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Relative performance of wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest value of Na+/K+ ratio in shoots was recorded for WH 1080 (1.167) and lowest in KRL 283 (0.612) under combined stresses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–717 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline accumulation was maximum in KRL 330 (3.17 mg g-1 FW).

Material
KRL 330e1
Outcome
Proline accumulatione1
Direction
maximume1
Value
3.17 mg g-1 FWe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Relative performance of wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
e1

“Proline accumulation was maximum in KRL 330 (3.17 mg g-1 FW) and minimum in KRL 283 (2.8 mg g-1 FW)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–818 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline accumulation was minimum in KRL 283 (2.8 mg g-1 FW).

Material
KRL 283e1
Outcome
Proline accumulatione1
Direction
minimume1
Value
2.8 mg g-1 FWe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Relative performance of wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
e1

“Proline accumulation was maximum in KRL 330 (3.17 mg g-1 FW) and minimum in KRL 283 (2.8 mg g-1 FW)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–818 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under 100 mM NaCl + 50% water deficit, grain weight per plant of HD 2009 showed a significantly higher reduction (73.4%) than the control.

Material
HD 2009e1
Treatment
100 mM NaCl + 50% WD stress treatmente1
Outcome
grain weight/plante1
Direction
higher reductione1
Value
73.4%e1
Comparator
control treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Relative performance of wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
e1

“Significantly higher reduction (73.4%) was observed in HD 2009 for grain weight/plant at 100 mM NaCl + 50% WD stress treatment whereas minimum reduction of 39.18% was recorded in KRL 370 in comparison to the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–1045 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under 100 mM NaCl + 50% water deficit, grain weight per plant of KRL 370 showed the minimum reduction (39.18%) compared with the control.

Material
KRL 370e1
Treatment
100 mM NaCl + 50% WD stress treatmente1
Outcome
grain weight/plante1
Direction
minimum reductione1
Value
39.18%e1
Comparator
control treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Relative performance of wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
e1

“Significantly higher reduction (73.4%) was observed in HD 2009 for grain weight/plant at 100 mM NaCl + 50% WD stress treatment whereas minimum reduction of 39.18% was recorded in KRL 370 in comparison to the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–1045 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The first three principal components explained about 91% of the total variation among the wheat genotypes.

Outcome
total variatione1
Value
about 91%e1
Qualifier
first three componentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Relative performance of wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
e1

“The PCA showed that the first three components comprising about 91% of the total variation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1137 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KRL 210 was the stable wheat genotype across environments, close to the centre of the AMMI biplot.

Material
KRL 210e1
Outcome
stable genotypee1
Qualifier
close to center on biplote1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Relative performance of wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
e1

“AMMI model revealed KRL 210 to be stable genotype as being close to center on biplot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1261 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The E5 environment (100 mM NaCl) was the most stable environment, followed by E9.

Treatment
E5 environment (100 mM NaCl)e1
Outcome
most stablee1
Direction
most stablee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Relative performance of wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
e1

“E5 environment (100 mM NaCl) was most stable followed by E9 (50% WD + 100 mM NaCl)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1345 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HD 2888, C-306 and HD 2851 had a positive interaction with the control environment E1.

Material
HD 2888, C-306, HD 2851e1
Treatment
E1 (Control)e1
Outcome
interaction with E1e1
Direction
positivee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Relative performance of wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
e1

“HD 2888, C-306, HD 2851 and HD 2009 were having positive interaction with E1 (Control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1347–1433 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HD 2009 had a positive interaction with the control environment E1.

Material
HD 2009e1
Treatment
E1 (Control)e1
Outcome
interaction with E1e1
Direction
positivee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Relative performance of wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
e1

“HD 2888, C-306, HD 2851 and HD 2009 were having positive interaction with E1 (Control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1347–1433 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WH 1080 had a positive interaction with the water deficit environments E2 and E3.

Material
WH 1080e1
Treatment
water deficit environments i.e. E2 and E3 (25 and 50% WD)e1
Outcome
interaction with water deficit environmentse1
Direction
positivee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Relative performance of wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
e1

“WH 1080 had positive interaction with water deficit environments i.e. E2 and E3 (25 and 50% WD)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1442–1537 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KRL 433 had the highest positive interaction with the combined water deficit and salt stress environments E6 to E9.

Material
KRL 433e1
Treatment
combined water deficit and salt stress environments E6, E7, E8 and E9e1
Outcome
interaction with combined water deficit and salt stress environmentse1
Direction
highest positivee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Relative performance of wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
e1

“KRL 433 had highest positive interaction with combined water deficit and salt stress environments E6, E7, E8 and E9, followed by KRL 370”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1544–1680 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KRL 370 ranked after KRL 433 in interaction with the combined water deficit and salt stress environments.

Material
KRL 370e1
Treatment
combined water deficit and salt stress environments E6, E7, E8 and E9e1
Outcome
interaction with combined water deficit and salt stress environmentse1
Direction
followed bye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Relative performance of wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
e1

“KRL 433 had highest positive interaction with combined water deficit and salt stress environments E6, E7, E8 and E9, followed by KRL 370”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1544–1680 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KRL 283, KRL 330 and KRL 210 had a high positive interaction with the saline environments E4 and E5.

Material
KRL 283, KRL 330, KRL 210e1
Treatment
saline environments E4 and E5e1
Outcome
interaction with saline environmentse1
Direction
positivee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Relative performance of wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
e1

“Similarly, KRL 283, KRL 330, KRL 210 and Kharchia 65 had high positive interaction with saline environments E4 and E5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1682–1799 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kharchia 65 had a high positive interaction with the saline environments E4 and E5.

Material
Kharchia 65e1
Treatment
saline environments E4 and E5e1
Outcome
interaction with saline environmentse1
Direction
positivee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Relative performance of wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
e1

“Similarly, KRL 283, KRL 330, KRL 210 and Kharchia 65 had high positive interaction with saline environments E4 and E5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1682–1799 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Location-specific promising genotypes could possibly be used to develop MAGIC populations for tagging drought and salinity tolerance genes in wheat breeding.

Outcome
location-specific promising genotypes could possibly be used to develop/breed MAGIC populationse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Findings of the experiment would be beneficial to wheat breeders, specifically the location-specific promising genotypes could possibly be used to develop/breed MAGIC populations to tag genes/alleles conferring drought and salinity tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1801–2042 · show in text ↑

sodium chloride · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

28 papers: 9 positive, 19 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

sodium chloride · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

32 papers: 6 positive, 26 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

salinity · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

100 papers: 11 positive, 89 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 89 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

96 papers more in this group

See all 100 papers →

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

246 papers: 41 positive, 205 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 204 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

242 papers more in this group

See all 246 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.