Paper · 2022 · International Journal of Environment and Climate Change

Effect of Foliar Application of GA3, NAA and Urea on Fruit Physiological Characterstics of Ber (Zizyphus mauritiana Lamk.) cv. Banarasi Karaka

Trivendra Kumar; Rakesh Kumar Gautam; Vishal Gangwar; et al.

5
claims
14
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Among subtropical fruits Ber (Zizyphus mauritiana L.) one of the most common fruit crop, grown under neglected soil types. It is a drought hardy and can grow under the most hazardous conditions of soil, water and climate and thus it has rightly been recommended for the arid and desert area of India [1]. It is found growing wild as well as in cultivated forms throughout the warmer regions up to an altitude of 1500 metres above Mean Sea Level. The experiment comprised 13 treatments consisting of foliar spray of GA3, NAA, Urea and control. The treatments are as follows- T0 Control (water spray), T1 (GA3 @10 ppm), T2 (GA3 @20 ppm), T3 (NAA @20 ppm), T4 (NAA @40 ppm), T5 (Urea @1.0%), T6 (Urea @1.5%), T7 (GA3 @10 ppm + NAA @20 ppm + Urea @1.0%), T8 (GA3 @20 ppm + NAA @40 ppm + urea @1.5%). Mentioned solutions with different concentration were sprayed by foot sprayer in the morning hours and selected branches were fully drenched. On the basis of sprays of plant growth regulators i.e. GA3 and NAA and urea as well as their combined treatments influenced different parameters in this research trial. The combined treatments of GA3 20 ppm + NAA 40 ppm + urea 1.5% maximized initial fruit set, fruit retention, fruit volume, length of fruit, fruit diameter, fruit weight, pulp weight, pulp/stone ratio and minimized the fruit drop, stone weight content. The second effective treatment was GA3 10 ppm + NAA 20 ppm + urea 1.0% identified in present investigation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined GA3 20 ppm, NAA 40 ppm and urea 1.5% treatment maximized initial fruit set, fruit retention and fruit volume.

Taxon
Zizyphus mauritiana L.Ziziphus mauritianae1
Treatment
GA3 20 ppm + NAA 40 ppm + urea 1.5%e3
Outcome
initial fruit set, fruit retention, fruit volumee3
Direction
maximizede3
Comparator
T0 Control (water spray)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus mauritiana
Ziziphus mauritiana · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The combined treatments of GA3 20 ppm + NAA 40 ppm + urea 1.5% maximized initial fruit set, fruit retention, fruit volume”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1228 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ber (Zizyphus mauritiana L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–53 · show in text ↑
e2

“T0 Control (water spray)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–598 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined GA3 20 ppm, NAA 40 ppm and urea 1.5% treatment maximized fruit length, diameter and weight.

Taxon
Zizyphus mauritiana L.Ziziphus mauritianae1
Treatment
GA3 20 ppm + NAA 40 ppm + urea 1.5%e4
Outcome
length of fruit, fruit diameter, fruit weighte4
Direction
maximizede4
Comparator
T0 Control (water spray)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus mauritiana
Ziziphus mauritiana · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The combined treatments of GA3 20 ppm + NAA 40 ppm + urea 1.5% maximized initial fruit set, fruit retention, fruit volume, length of fruit, fruit diameter, fruit weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1275 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ber (Zizyphus mauritiana L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–53 · show in text ↑
e2

“T0 Control (water spray)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–598 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined GA3 20 ppm, NAA 40 ppm and urea 1.5% treatment maximized pulp weight and pulp/stone ratio.

Taxon
Zizyphus mauritiana L.Ziziphus mauritianae1
Treatment
GA3 20 ppm + NAA 40 ppm + urea 1.5%e5
Outcome
pulp weight, pulp/stone ratioe5
Direction
maximizede5
Comparator
T0 Control (water spray)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus mauritiana
Ziziphus mauritiana · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“The combined treatments of GA3 20 ppm + NAA 40 ppm + urea 1.5% maximized initial fruit set, fruit retention, fruit volume, length of fruit, fruit diameter, fruit weight, pulp weight, pulp/stone ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1306 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ber (Zizyphus mauritiana L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–53 · show in text ↑
e2

“T0 Control (water spray)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–598 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined GA3 20 ppm, NAA 40 ppm and urea 1.5% treatment minimized fruit drop and stone weight content.

Taxon
Zizyphus mauritiana L.Ziziphus mauritianae1
Treatment
GA3 20 ppm + NAA 40 ppm + urea 1.5%e3
Outcome
fruit drop, stone weight contente6
Direction
minimizede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus mauritiana
Ziziphus mauritiana · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“minimized the fruit drop, stone weight content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1357 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ber (Zizyphus mauritiana L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–53 · show in text ↑
e3

“The combined treatments of GA3 20 ppm + NAA 40 ppm + urea 1.5% maximized initial fruit set, fruit retention, fruit volume”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1228 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 10 ppm, NAA 20 ppm and urea 1.0% was the second most effective treatment.

Taxon
Zizyphus mauritiana L.Ziziphus mauritianae1
Treatment
GA3 10 ppm + NAA 20 ppm + urea 1.0%e7
Outcome
effective treatmente7
Direction
second effectivee7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus mauritiana
Ziziphus mauritiana · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“The second effective treatment was GA3 10 ppm + NAA 20 ppm + urea 1.0% identified in present investigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1359–1465 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ber (Zizyphus mauritiana L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–53 · show in text ↑

Gibberellic acid · yield · Ziziphus mauritiana (ber)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · yield · Ziziphus mauritiana (ber)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Ziziphus mauritiana (ber)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.