Paper · 2022 · International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences

Nematicidal effect of chitosan on Meloidogyne incognita in vitro and on tomato in a pot experiment

Fatma Gül GÖZE ÖZDEMİR; Hacer ÇEVİK; Jean Claude NDAYIRAGIJE; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present study investigated to evaluate the potential of liquid chitosan of three concentrations (0.5, 1 and 2%) on Meloidogyne incognita (Kofoid and White, 1919) Chitwood, 1949 in vitro and on tomato under controlled conditions ((24 ± 1 °C, 60 ± 5% humidity). In vitro assay, the effect of the liquid chitosan concentrations on suppressing of hatching from eggs and second juvenile larvae (J2) mortality was determined. The reducing effect of the concentrations on the number of gall and egg mass on tomato roots and the J2 density in the soil was evaluated under controlled conditions. All concentrations suppressed hatch and increased J2 mortality more than control in vitro. The most effective concentration was found at 2% in vitro and its nematicidal effect on egg and J2 was over 70%. The results demonstrated that 0.5, 1 and 2% concentrations were significantly decreased gall/root, egg mass/root and J2 in soil compared to negative control under controlled conditions. No statistically significant difference was found between the nematicidal effects of the concentrations on the gall and egg mass (P≤0.05). It has been determined that 1 and 2% concentrations better suppress the J2 in soil than 0.5%. Although the nematicidal effect of 2% concentration was high in vitro and under controlled conditions, it was determined that it negatively affected plant biomass. Also, only 1% concentration of chitosan application controlled M. incognita on tomato by 58%. The present results show that the use of 1% liquid chitosan concentration against M. incognita will be more effective.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All tested chitosan concentrations suppressed egg hatch relative to control in vitro.

Treatment
All concentrationse0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0t0pathogen
Outcome
hatche0
Direction
suppressede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All concentrations suppressed hatch and increased J2 mortality more than control in vitro.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–681 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nematicidal effect of chitosan on Meloidogyne incognita in vitro and on tomato in a pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All tested concentrations increased second-stage juvenile mortality relative to control in vitro.

Treatment
All concentrationse0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0t0pathogen
Outcome
J2 mortalitye0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All concentrations suppressed hatch and increased J2 mortality more than control in vitro.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–681 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nematicidal effect of chitosan on Meloidogyne incognita in vitro and on tomato in a pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2% concentration had more than 70% nematicidal effect on eggs and juveniles in vitro.

Treatment
2%e0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0t0pathogen
Outcome
nematicidal effect on egg and J2e0
Direction
most effectivee0
Value
over 70%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The most effective concentration was found at 2% in vitro and its nematicidal effect on egg and J2 was over 70%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–794 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nematicidal effect of chitosan on Meloidogyne incognita in vitro and on tomato in a pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All three concentrations significantly decreased tomato root galls relative to negative control.

Treatment
0.5, 1 and 2% concentrationse0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0t0pathogen
Outcome
gall/roote0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
negative controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results demonstrated that 0.5, 1 and 2% concentrations were significantly decreased gall/root, egg mass/root and J2 in soil compared to negative control under controlled conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–980 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nematicidal effect of chitosan on Meloidogyne incognita in vitro and on tomato in a pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All three concentrations significantly decreased egg masses per tomato root relative to negative control.

Treatment
0.5, 1 and 2% concentrationse0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0t0pathogen
Outcome
egg mass/roote0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
negative controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results demonstrated that 0.5, 1 and 2% concentrations were significantly decreased gall/root, egg mass/root and J2 in soil compared to negative control under controlled conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–980 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nematicidal effect of chitosan on Meloidogyne incognita in vitro and on tomato in a pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All three concentrations significantly decreased soil juveniles relative to negative control.

Treatment
0.5, 1 and 2% concentrationse0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0t0pathogen
Outcome
J2 in soile0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
negative controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results demonstrated that 0.5, 1 and 2% concentrations were significantly decreased gall/root, egg mass/root and J2 in soil compared to negative control under controlled conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–980 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nematicidal effect of chitosan on Meloidogyne incognita in vitro and on tomato in a pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematicidal effects on galls and egg masses did not differ significantly among concentrations.

Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0t0pathogen
Outcome
nematicidal effects of the concentrations on the gall and egg masse0
Direction
No statistically significant differencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No statistically significant difference was found between the nematicidal effects of the concentrations on the gall and egg mass (P≤0.05).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1119 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nematicidal effect of chitosan on Meloidogyne incognita in vitro and on tomato in a pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1% and 2% concentrations suppressed soil juveniles more than the 0.5% concentration.

Treatment
1 and 2% concentrationse0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0t0pathogen
Outcome
J2 in soile0
Direction
better suppresse0
Comparator
0.5%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It has been determined that 1 and 2% concentrations better suppress the J2 in soil than 0.5%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1213 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nematicidal effect of chitosan on Meloidogyne incognita in vitro and on tomato in a pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2% concentration negatively affected tomato biomass.

Treatment
2% concentratione0
Outcome
plant biomasse0
Direction
negatively affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Although the nematicidal effect of 2% concentration was high in vitro and under controlled conditions, it was determined that it negatively affected plant biomass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1377 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nematicidal effect of chitosan on Meloidogyne incognita in vitro and on tomato in a pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1% concentration controlled M. incognita on tomato by 58%.

Treatment
1% concentration of chitosan applicatione0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
controlled M. incognita on tomatoe0
Direction
controllede0
Value
58%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Also, only 1% concentration of chitosan application controlled M. incognita on tomato by 58%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1378–1471 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nematicidal effect of chitosan on Meloidogyne incognita in vitro and on tomato in a pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 1% liquid chitosan against M. incognita.

Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
use of 1% liquid chitosan concentration against M. incognitae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The present results show that the use of 1% liquid chitosan concentration against M. incognita will be more effective.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1472–1590 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nematicidal effect of chitosan on Meloidogyne incognita in vitro and on tomato in a pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑

chitosan · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.