Paper · 2022 · International Journal of Phytoremediation

Comparative evaluation of cadmium phytoremediation potential of five varieties of Helianthus annuus L.

Jyoti Mathur; Priti Chauhan; Sudhakar Srivastava

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Helianthus annuus is a potential metal accumulator plant, which can find application in cadmium (Cd) phytoremediation and provide economic gains in terms of oil yield. This study is focused on Cd accumulation analysis, physiological and biochemical responses of five varieties of H. annuus (DRSF-108, DRSF-113, LSFH-171, Phule Bhaskar and KBSH-44). Plantlets of all varieties were treated with various Cd concentrations (10, 50, 100, 300 and 500 mg kg−1) for 20, 40 and 60 days. DRSF-108 showed the maximum total Cd accumulation (430.52 mg kg−1) in whole plant while minimum accumulation was observed in KBSH-44 (150.66 mg kg−1) at 500 mg kg−1 Cd after 60 days. The highest level of proline and polyphenol in DRSF-108 were 27.206 µmol g−1 fw and 6.86 mg g−1 fw, respectively. Antioxidant enzymes (catalase, ascorbate peroxidase and glutathione reductase) also showed increased activity in response to Cd treatment. SEM-EDX analysis of potential accumulator genotype, DRSF-108, showed the distribution of intracellular Cd into plant tissues. Therefore, it is concluded that among five varieties, DRSF-108 was the most potential Cd accumulator and had a higher capacity for Cd tolerance compared to other varieties. Our findings may allow us to extend variety DRSF-108 for sustainable farming and Cd remediation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DRSF-108 accumulated the most cadmium, 430.52 mg kg−1, at the highest exposure after 60 days.

Taxon
Helianthus annuus L.Helianthus annuust0
Material
DRSF-108e0
Treatment
500 mg kg−1 Cde0
Outcome
total Cd accumulatione0
Direction
maximume0
Value
430.52 mg kg−1e0
Qualifier
after 60 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DRSF-108 showed the maximum total Cd accumulation (430.52 mg kg−1) in whole plant while minimum accumulation was observed in KBSH-44 (150.66 mg kg−1) at 500 mg kg−1 Cd after 60 days.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–661 · show in text ↑
t0

“Helianthus annuus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–102 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KBSH-44 accumulated the least cadmium, 150.66 mg kg−1, at the highest exposure after 60 days.

Taxon
Helianthus annuus L.Helianthus annuust0
Material
KBSH-44e0
Treatment
500 mg kg−1 Cde0
Outcome
Cd accumulatione0
Direction
minimume0
Value
150.66 mg kg−1e0
Qualifier
after 60 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DRSF-108 showed the maximum total Cd accumulation (430.52 mg kg−1) in whole plant while minimum accumulation was observed in KBSH-44 (150.66 mg kg−1) at 500 mg kg−1 Cd after 60 days.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–661 · show in text ↑
t0

“Helianthus annuus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–102 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DRSF-108 had the highest reported proline level of 27.206 µmol g−1 fw.

Taxon
Helianthus annuus L.Helianthus annuust0
Material
DRSF-108e0
Outcome
level of prolinee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
27.206 µmol g−1 fwe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest level of proline and polyphenol in DRSF-108 were 27.206 µmol g−1 fw and 6.86 mg g−1 fw, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–775 · show in text ↑
t0

“Helianthus annuus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–102 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DRSF-108 had the highest reported polyphenol level of 6.86 mg g−1 fw.

Taxon
Helianthus annuus L.Helianthus annuust0
Material
DRSF-108e0
Outcome
polyphenole0
Direction
higheste0
Value
6.86 mg g−1 fwe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest level of proline and polyphenol in DRSF-108 were 27.206 µmol g−1 fw and 6.86 mg g−1 fw, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–775 · show in text ↑
t0

“Helianthus annuus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Catalase, ascorbate peroxidase and glutathione reductase activity increased with cadmium treatment.

Taxon
Helianthus annuus L.Helianthus annuust0
Treatment
Cd treatmente0
Outcome
Antioxidant enzymes (catalase, ascorbate peroxidase and glutathione reductase)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Antioxidant enzymes (catalase, ascorbate peroxidase and glutathione reductase) also showed increased activity in response to Cd treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–914 · show in text ↑
t0

“Helianthus annuus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–102 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SEM-EDX showed intracellular cadmium distribution in DRSF-108 tissues.

Taxon
Helianthus annuus L.Helianthus annuust0
Material
DRSF-108e0
Outcome
distribution of intracellular Cd into plant tissuese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SEM-EDX analysis of potential accumulator genotype, DRSF-108, showed the distribution of intracellular Cd into plant tissues.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–1040 · show in text ↑
t0

“Helianthus annuus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–102 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DRSF-108 was judged the strongest cadmium accumulator and more tolerant than the other varieties.

Taxon
Helianthus annuus L.Helianthus annuust0
Material
DRSF-108e0
Outcome
Cd tolerancee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other varietiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Therefore, it is concluded that among five varieties, DRSF-108 was the most potential Cd accumulator and had a higher capacity for Cd tolerance compared to other varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1213 · show in text ↑
t0

“Helianthus annuus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–102 · show in text ↑

cadmium atom · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results differ

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.