Paper · 2022 · Scientific Reports

Effect of slow-release nitrogenous fertilizers on dry matter accumulation, grain nutritional quality, water productivity and wheat yield under an arid environment

Iqra Ghafoor; Muhammad Habib ur Rahman; Muhammad Usama Hasnain; et al.

13
claims
25
verbatim quotes
38
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Slow release nitrogenous fertilizers can improve crops production and reduce the environmental challenges in agro-ecosystem. There is a need to test the efficiency and performance under arid climatic conditions. The study investigates the effect of slow-release fertilizers (urea, neem coated urea (NCU), sulfur coated urea (SCU) and bioactive sulfur coated urea (BSCU)) on the growth, productivity and grain nutritional qualities of wheat crop. Slow-release fertilizers (SRF) with nitrogen levels (130,117,104 and 94 kg ha −1 ) were applied with equal splits at sowing, 20 and 60 days after sowing (DAS). Research showed that the BSCU with 130 kg ha −1 increased dry matter accumulation (1989 kg ha −1 ) after anthesis and grain yield 4463 kg ha −1 . The higher plant height (102 cm) was attained by 130 kg N ha −1 SCU while the minimum (77.67 cm) recorded for 94 kg N ha −1 as urea source. Maximum grain NPK concentrations (3.54, 0.66 and 1.07%) were recorded by BSCU 130 kg N ha −1 application. While, the minimum NPK (0.77, 0.19 and 0.35%) were observed by Urea 94 kg N ha −1 . The high irrigation water use efficiency (WUE) recorded (20.92 kg ha −1 mm −1 ) and a crop index of 25.52% by BSCU 130 kg N ha −1 application. Research findings show that generally all SRF but particularly BSCU proved effective and can be recommended for wheat crop under arid environment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BSCU at 130 kg per hectare increased post-anthesis dry matter accumulation to 1989 kg per hectare.

Organ / stage
after anthesise0
Treatment
BSCU with 130 kg ha −1e0
Outcome
dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1989 kg ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“BSCU with 130 kg ha −1 increased dry matter accumulation (1989 kg ha −1 ) after anthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–728 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BSCU at 130 kg per hectare increased grain yield to 4463 kg per hectare.

Treatment
BSCU with 130 kg ha −1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
4463 kg ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“BSCU with 130 kg ha −1 increased dry matter accumulation (1989 kg ha −1 ) after anthesis and grain yield 4463 kg ha −1 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–760 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–130 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SCU at 130 kg N per hectare produced the highest plant height of 102 cm.

Treatment
130 kg N ha −1 SCUe0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
102 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The higher plant height (102 cm) was attained by 130 kg N ha −1 SCU”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–828 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–130 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea at 94 kg N per hectare had the minimum plant height of 77.67 cm.

Treatment
94 kg N ha −1 as urea sourcee0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
minimume0
Value
77.67 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The higher plant height (102 cm) was attained by 130 kg N ha −1 SCU while the minimum (77.67 cm) recorded for 94 kg N ha −1 as urea source.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–900 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–130 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BSCU at 130 kg N per hectare gave maximum grain N concentration of 3.54%.

Treatment
BSCU 130 kg N ha −1 applicatione0
Outcome
grain NPK concentrationse0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
3.54e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum grain NPK concentrations (3.54, 0.66 and 1.07%) were recorded by BSCU 130 kg N ha −1 application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1006 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–130 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BSCU at 130 kg N per hectare gave maximum grain P concentration of 0.66%.

Treatment
BSCU 130 kg N ha −1 applicatione0
Outcome
grain NPK concentrationse0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
0.66e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum grain NPK concentrations (3.54, 0.66 and 1.07%) were recorded by BSCU 130 kg N ha −1 application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1006 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–130 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BSCU at 130 kg N per hectare gave maximum grain K concentration of 1.07%.

Treatment
BSCU 130 kg N ha −1 applicatione0
Outcome
grain NPK concentrationse0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
1.07%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum grain NPK concentrations (3.54, 0.66 and 1.07%) were recorded by BSCU 130 kg N ha −1 application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1006 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–130 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea at 94 kg N per hectare gave minimum grain N concentration of 0.77%.

Treatment
Urea 94 kg N ha −1e0
Outcome
NPKe0
Direction
minimume0
Value
0.77e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the minimum NPK (0.77, 0.19 and 0.35%) were observed by Urea 94 kg N ha −1 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1090 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–130 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea at 94 kg N per hectare gave minimum grain P concentration of 0.19%.

Treatment
Urea 94 kg N ha −1e0
Outcome
NPKe0
Direction
minimume0
Value
0.19e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the minimum NPK (0.77, 0.19 and 0.35%) were observed by Urea 94 kg N ha −1 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1090 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–130 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea at 94 kg N per hectare gave minimum grain K concentration of 0.35%.

Treatment
Urea 94 kg N ha −1e0
Outcome
NPKe0
Direction
minimume0
Value
0.35%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the minimum NPK (0.77, 0.19 and 0.35%) were observed by Urea 94 kg N ha −1 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1090 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–130 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BSCU at 130 kg N per hectare gave irrigation water use efficiency of 20.92 kg ha per mm.

Treatment
BSCU 130 kg N ha −1 applicatione0
Outcome
irrigation water use efficiency (WUE)e0
Direction
highe0
Value
20.92 kg ha −1 mm −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The high irrigation water use efficiency (WUE) recorded (20.92 kg ha −1 mm −1 ) and a crop index of 25.52% by BSCU 130 kg N ha −1 application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1233 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–130 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BSCU at 130 kg N per hectare gave a crop index of 25.52%.

Treatment
BSCU 130 kg N ha −1 applicatione0
Outcome
crop indexe0
Value
25.52%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a crop index of 25.52% by BSCU 130 kg N ha −1 application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1233 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–130 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend slow-release fertilizers, especially BSCU, for wheat under arid conditions.

Treatment
BSCUe0
Outcome
recommended for wheat crop under arid environmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“generally all SRF but particularly BSCU proved effective and can be recommended for wheat crop under arid environment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1380 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

148 papers: 124 positive, 24 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

144 papers more in this group

See all 148 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.