Paper · 2024 · Agriculture

Increasing Planting Density with Reduced Topdressing Nitrogen Inputs Increased Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Improved Grain Quality While Maintaining Yields in Weak-Gluten Wheat

Wenyin Zhou; Suhui Yan; Abdul Rehman; et al.

14
claims
30
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Increasing nitrogen fertilizer will increase wheat grain yield and grain quality at the same time, but the goal of high quality and stable yield in weak-gluten wheat production is to reduce grain protein content and increase grain yield. Our research goal is to reduce nitrogen input while increasing planting density to maintain high quality and stable yield. Field studies were conducted during two successive seasons using a widely planted cultivar, Yangmai 15. We studied the effects of reduced nitrogen topdressing and increased planting density on yield, quality and nitrogen agronomic efficiency. The field experiment was conducted with four nitrogen (N) levels for topdressing at jointing stage: 37.8 (N1), 43.2 (N2), 48.6 (N3) and 54 kg N ha−1 (N4). Moreover, there were three planting densities: 180, 240 and 300 × 104 plants ha−1 (D1, D2 and D3, respectively). When the amount of nitrogen topdressing was reduced, the number of tillers and spikes in each growth period of wheat decreased significantly, and the yield increased first and then decreased, with the highest yield at the level of 48.6 kg N ha−1. When the planting density was increased, the number of tillers and spikes in each growth period of wheat increased significantly, the yield increased significantly, and the yield was the highest at the level of 180 × 104 plants ha−1. Under the same density level, the flag leaf chlorophyll content, leaf area index, nitrogen production efficiency and nitrogen use efficiency decreased with a decrease in the nitrogen application rate. Under the same nitrogen topdressing amount, the nitrogen fertilizer production efficiency and nitrogen fertilizer utilization efficiency increased with the increase in density. The relative chlorophyll content, leaf area index, nitrogen partial factor productivity, nitrogen use efficiency, grain accumulation, grain distribution ratio and grain yield of wheat were the highest under the treatment of a planting density of 300 × 104 plants ha−1 and nitrogen topdressing amount of 48.6 kg N ha−1. The combined decrease in nitrogen recovery and increase in planting density decreased protein content, sedimentation value and wet gluten content. Increasing density significantly improved dry matter accumulation in the population, partially compensating for the yield loss due to nitrogen reduction by increasing the effective number of spikes, thereby further improving grain quality and nitrogen use efficiency. Therefore, agronomic approaches combining low nitrogen and high planting densities may be effective in simultaneously increasing grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency and stabilizing grain processing quality in weakly reinforced wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced nitrogen topdressing significantly decreased the number of tillers and spikes of wheat.

Treatment
nitrogen topdressinge1
Outcome
number of tillers and spikese1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Weak-Gluten Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 158–175 · show in text ↑
e1

“When the amount of nitrogen topdressing was reduced, the number of tillers and spikes in each growth period of wheat decreased significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–1012 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced nitrogen topdressing was associated with a first increase and then decrease in wheat yield, highest at 48.6 kg N ha−1.

Treatment
nitrogen topdressinge1
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
increasede2
Qualifier
the highest yield at the level of 48.6 kg N ha−1e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Weak-Gluten Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 158–175 · show in text ↑
e1

“When the amount of nitrogen topdressing was reduced, the number of tillers and spikes in each growth period of wheat decreased significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–1012 · show in text ↑
e2

“the yield increased first and then decreased, with the highest yield at the level of 48.6 kg N ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased planting density significantly increased the number of tillers and spikes of wheat.

Treatment
planting densitye3
Outcome
number of tillers and spikese3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Weak-Gluten Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 158–175 · show in text ↑
e3

“When the planting density was increased, the number of tillers and spikes in each growth period of wheat increased significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1247 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased planting density significantly increased wheat yield, highest at 180 × 104 plants ha−1.

Treatment
planting densitye3
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
increasede4
Qualifier
the highest at the level of 180 × 104 plants ha−1e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Weak-Gluten Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 158–175 · show in text ↑
e3

“When the planting density was increased, the number of tillers and spikes in each growth period of wheat increased significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1247 · show in text ↑
e4

“the yield increased significantly, and the yield was the highest at the level of 180 × 104 plants ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1351 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The planting density of 300 × 104 plants ha−1 with 48.6 kg N ha−1 topdressing gave the highest relative chlorophyll content and leaf area index of wheat.

Treatment
planting density of 300 × 104 plants ha−1e5
Outcome
relative chlorophyll content, leaf area indexe5
Direction
higheste5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Weak-Gluten Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 158–175 · show in text ↑
e5

“The relative chlorophyll content, leaf area index, nitrogen partial factor productivity, nitrogen use efficiency, grain accumulation, grain distribution ratio and grain yield of wheat were the highest under the treatment of a planting density of 300 × 104 plants ha−1 and nitrogen topdressing amount of 48.6 kg N ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1731–2048 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The planting density of 300 × 104 plants ha−1 with 48.6 kg N ha−1 topdressing gave the highest nitrogen partial factor productivity, nitrogen use efficiency and grain accumulation of wheat.

Treatment
planting density of 300 × 104 plants ha−1e5
Outcome
nitrogen partial factor productivity, nitrogen use efficiency, grain accumulatione5
Direction
higheste5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Weak-Gluten Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 158–175 · show in text ↑
e5

“The relative chlorophyll content, leaf area index, nitrogen partial factor productivity, nitrogen use efficiency, grain accumulation, grain distribution ratio and grain yield of wheat were the highest under the treatment of a planting density of 300 × 104 plants ha−1 and nitrogen topdressing amount of 48.6 kg N ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1731–2048 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The planting density of 300 × 104 plants ha−1 with 48.6 kg N ha−1 topdressing gave the highest grain distribution ratio and grain yield of wheat.

Treatment
planting density of 300 × 104 plants ha−1e5
Outcome
grain distribution ratio and grain yielde5
Direction
higheste5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Weak-Gluten Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 158–175 · show in text ↑
e5

“The relative chlorophyll content, leaf area index, nitrogen partial factor productivity, nitrogen use efficiency, grain accumulation, grain distribution ratio and grain yield of wheat were the highest under the treatment of a planting density of 300 × 104 plants ha−1 and nitrogen topdressing amount of 48.6 kg N ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1731–2048 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower nitrogen application rate decreased flag leaf chlorophyll content and leaf area index of wheat at the same density.

Treatment
decrease in the nitrogen application ratee6
Outcome
flag leaf chlorophyll content, leaf area indexe6
Direction
decreasede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Weak-Gluten Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 158–175 · show in text ↑
e6

“the flag leaf chlorophyll content, leaf area index, nitrogen production efficiency and nitrogen use efficiency decreased with a decrease in the nitrogen application rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1383–1552 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower nitrogen application rate decreased nitrogen production efficiency and nitrogen use efficiency of wheat at the same density.

Treatment
decrease in the nitrogen application ratee6
Outcome
nitrogen production efficiency and nitrogen use efficiencye6
Direction
decreasede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Weak-Gluten Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 158–175 · show in text ↑
e6

“the flag leaf chlorophyll content, leaf area index, nitrogen production efficiency and nitrogen use efficiency decreased with a decrease in the nitrogen application rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1383–1552 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased planting density increased nitrogen fertilizer production efficiency and nitrogen fertilizer utilization efficiency of wheat under the same nitrogen topdressing amount.

Treatment
increase in densitye7
Outcome
nitrogen fertilizer production efficiency and nitrogen fertilizer utilization efficiencye7
Direction
increasede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Weak-Gluten Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 158–175 · show in text ↑
e7

“the nitrogen fertilizer production efficiency and nitrogen fertilizer utilization efficiency increased with the increase in density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1598–1729 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined decrease in nitrogen recovery and increase in planting density decreased protein content, sedimentation value and wet gluten content of wheat.

Treatment
combined decrease in nitrogen recovery and increase in planting densitye0
Outcome
protein content, sedimentation value and wet gluten contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Weak-Gluten Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 158–175 · show in text ↑
e0

“The combined decrease in nitrogen recovery and increase in planting density decreased protein content, sedimentation value and wet gluten content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2050–2195 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased planting density significantly improved dry matter accumulation in the wheat population.

Treatment
Increasing densitye1
Outcome
dry matter accumulation in the populatione1
Direction
improvede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Weak-Gluten Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 158–175 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increasing density significantly improved dry matter accumulation in the population, partially compensating for the yield loss due to nitrogen reduction by increasing the effective number of spikes, thereby further improving grain quality and nitrogen use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2197–2463 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased planting density further improved grain quality and nitrogen use efficiency of wheat, partly compensating for yield loss from nitrogen reduction.

Treatment
Increasing densitye1
Outcome
grain quality and nitrogen use efficiencye1
Direction
improvinge1
Qualifier
partially compensating for the yield loss due to nitrogen reductione1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Weak-Gluten Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 158–175 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increasing density significantly improved dry matter accumulation in the population, partially compensating for the yield loss due to nitrogen reduction by increasing the effective number of spikes, thereby further improving grain quality and nitrogen use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2197–2463 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Agronomic approaches combining low nitrogen and high planting densities may be effective for raising grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency while stabilizing grain processing quality.

Outcome
agronomic approaches combining low nitrogen and high planting densitiese2
Qualifier
may be effectivee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Weak-Gluten Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 158–175 · show in text ↑
e2

“agronomic approaches combining low nitrogen and high planting densities may be effective in simultaneously increasing grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency and stabilizing grain processing quality in weakly reinforced wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2476–2701 · show in text ↑

rewatering · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

density · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

density · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 19 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

nitrogen · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

454 papers: 400 positive, 54 negative or no effect

53 papers in the same direction as this paper · 400 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

450 papers more in this group

See all 454 papers →

density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

498 papers: 376 positive, 122 negative or no effect

375 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

494 papers more in this group

See all 498 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

323 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,737 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.