Paper · 2002 · Journal of Plant Production

SOME PARAMETERS AFFECTING ON SOME DISEASES AND YIELD OF SUGAR BEET (Beta vulgaris, L.) AT DAKAHLIA GOVERNORATE.

B. AI-Laithy,

11
claims
24
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The field experiments were conducted at two locations, Tag EI-Ezz experimental station and Belkas region in Dakajhlia Govemorate during agricultural seasons (1997/98 and 1998199) in clay loam soil to study the effect of some factors (sowing dates 15th, 30th October and 151h November) and some sugar beet varieties (Top, Gloria, Oscar and Pamela) to know the effect of these factors on yield and some diseases. The varieties which were planted at 151h of October gave the least percentage of diseases and the highest yield, followed by the 30th of October, while those of 15111 of November gave the highest percentage of infection and the lowest yield. The main results of this study revealed that sugar beet sown at 15th October gave the highest yield of root as well as sugar yield. Delaying of sowing date to 15th November reduced sucrose contents. The cultivar Top was the best cultivar when gave the lowest percentages of Damping-off, Cercospora leaf spot and Root-rot diseases and the highest yield followed by Gloria, Oscar while Pamela gave the highest percentage of infections and the lowest yield. The interaction between sowing dates and varieties gave different effect of infection percentage and yield in two agricultural seasons.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar beet planted on 15 October had the least percentage of diseases compared with 30 October sowing.

Treatment
planted at 151h of Octobere1
Outcome
percentage of diseasese1
Direction
leaste1
Comparator
30th of Octobere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SUGAR BEET (Beta vulgaris, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“The varieties which were planted at 151h of October gave the least percentage of diseases and the highest yield, followed by the 30th of October”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–555 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar beet planted on 15 October had the highest yield compared with 30 October sowing.

Treatment
planted at 151h of Octobere1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Comparator
30th of Octobere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SUGAR BEET (Beta vulgaris, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“The varieties which were planted at 151h of October gave the least percentage of diseases and the highest yield, followed by the 30th of October”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–555 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar beet planted on 15 November had the highest percentage of infection compared with 15 October sowing.

Treatment
15111 of Novembere1
Outcome
percentage of infectione1
Direction
higheste1
Comparator
151h of Octobere2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SUGAR BEET (Beta vulgaris, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“while those of 15111 of November gave the highest percentage of infection and the lowest yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–651 · show in text ↑
e2

“planted at 151h of October”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–462 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar beet planted on 15 November had the lowest yield compared with 15 October sowing.

Treatment
15111 of Novembere1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
loweste1
Comparator
151h of Octobere2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SUGAR BEET (Beta vulgaris, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“while those of 15111 of November gave the highest percentage of infection and the lowest yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–651 · show in text ↑
e2

“planted at 151h of October”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–462 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar beet sown at 15 October gave the highest root and sugar yield.

Treatment
sown at 15th Octobere2
Outcome
yield of root as well as sugar yielde2
Direction
higheste2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SUGAR BEET (Beta vulgaris, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–86 · show in text ↑
e2

“sugar beet sown at 15th October gave the highest yield of root as well as sugar yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–783 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying sowing to 15 November reduced sucrose content in sugar beet.

Treatment
Delaying of sowing date to 15th Novembere3
Outcome
sucrose contentse3
Direction
reducede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SUGAR BEET (Beta vulgaris, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–86 · show in text ↑
e3

“Delaying of sowing date to 15th November reduced sucrose contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–850 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar Top had the lowest percentages of Damping-off, Cercospora leaf spot and Root-rot diseases.

Material
Tope4
Outcome
percentages of Damping-off, Cercospora leaf spot and Root-rot diseasese4
Direction
loweste4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SUGAR BEET (Beta vulgaris, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–86 · show in text ↑
e4

“The cultivar Top was the best cultivar when gave the lowest percentages of Damping-off, Cercospora leaf spot and Root-rot diseases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–982 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar Top had the highest yield, followed by Gloria and Oscar.

Material
Tope4
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
higheste4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SUGAR BEET (Beta vulgaris, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–86 · show in text ↑
e4

“The cultivar Top was the best cultivar when gave the lowest percentages of Damping-off, Cercospora leaf spot and Root-rot diseases and the highest yield followed by Gloria, Oscar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–1030 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar Pamela had the highest percentage of infections.

Material
Pamelae4
Outcome
percentage of infectionse4
Direction
higheste4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SUGAR BEET (Beta vulgaris, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–86 · show in text ↑
e4

“while Pamela gave the highest percentage of infections and the lowest yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1106 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar Pamela had the lowest yield.

Material
Pamelae4
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
loweste4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SUGAR BEET (Beta vulgaris, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–86 · show in text ↑
e4

“while Pamela gave the highest percentage of infections and the lowest yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1106 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction of sowing dates and varieties gave different effects on infection percentage and yield in the two seasons.

Treatment
sowing dates and varietiese5
Outcome
infection percentage and yielde5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SUGAR BEET (Beta vulgaris, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–86 · show in text ↑
e5

“The interaction between sowing dates and varieties gave different effect of infection percentage and yield in two agricultural seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1242 · show in text ↑

sowing time · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.