Paper · 2023 · Plant Science Today

Evaluation of the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of sugar beet cultivars in different sowing times and transplanting and direct-seeding systems

Shahrokh Pahlavanian Miandoab; Mohammad Reza Dadashi; Touraj Mir Mahmoudi; et al.

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

To study the characteristics of sugar beet cultivars in transplanting and direct-seeding systems on three different sowing times (March 29, April 8, and April 18), a split plot experiment based on randomized complete blocks in three replications was carried out in Miandoab and Bokan regions, Northwest of Iran in 2016. The results showed that the highest nitrogen content was observed between the two test locations in the Bukan area. Results showed that the low root sodium, alkalinity, and molasses content was recorded for transplanting system. The minimum content of root sodium, nitrogen, and molasses sugar was observed in the plants sown on March 29. The Dorotea cultivar showed the highest root yield, sugar yield, and white sugar yield and the lowest root nitrogen and molasses sugar content compared to Isabella and Ekbatan. The highest white sugar content, coefficient of sugar extraction, sugar yield, root yield, and white sugar yield were recorded in the transplanting system with the sowing time of March 29; however, the highest content of root potassium and sugar content was observed in the transplanting system sown on April 18. The highest root yield was observed in the Dorotea cultivar, with a sowing time of March 29. Among the locations in the cultivar and planting system interaction treatments, the highest sugar content was found in the Bukan area's Dorotea cultivar in the transplanting system. Finally, the highest sugar yield was related to the transplanting system on March 29 in the Bukan area. It can be stated that an early sowing time (March 29), transplanting, and Dorotea variety were identified as the most appropriate treatments to improve the economic traits of sugar beet.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root nitrogen was highest at Bukan.

Outcome
nitrogen contente0
Direction
higheste0
Setting
Bukan areae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest nitrogen content was observed between the two test locations in the Bukan area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 348–434 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplanting produced low root sodium, alkalinity and molasses content.

Treatment
transplanting systeme0
Outcome
root sodium, alkalinity, and molasses contente0
Direction
lowe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“low root sodium, alkalinity, and molasses content was recorded for transplanting system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–547 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

March 29 sowing gave minimum root sodium, nitrogen and molasses sugar.

Treatment
sown on March 29e0
Outcome
root sodium, nitrogen, and molasses sugare0
Direction
minimume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“minimum content of root sodium, nitrogen, and molasses sugar was observed in the plants sown on March 29”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–657 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–76 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dorotea had the highest root, sugar and white sugar yields versus Isabella and Ekbatan.

Material
Doroteae0
Outcome
root yield, sugar yield, and white sugar yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
Isabella and Ekbatane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Dorotea cultivar showed the highest root yield, sugar yield, and white sugar yield and the lowest root nitrogen and molasses sugar content compared to Isabella and Ekbatan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–834 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–76 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dorotea had the lowest root nitrogen and molasses sugar versus Isabella and Ekbatan.

Material
Doroteae0
Outcome
root nitrogen and molasses sugar contente0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
Isabella and Ekbatane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Dorotea cultivar showed the highest root yield, sugar yield, and white sugar yield and the lowest root nitrogen and molasses sugar content compared to Isabella and Ekbatan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–834 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplanting on March 29 maximized white sugar content, extraction coefficient and yields.

Treatment
transplanting system with the sowing time of March 29e0
Outcome
white sugar content, coefficient of sugar extraction, sugar yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest white sugar content, coefficient of sugar extraction, sugar yield, root yield, and white sugar yield were recorded in the transplanting system with the sowing time of March 29”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–1023 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplanting on April 18 maximized root potassium and sugar content.

Treatment
transplanting system sown on April 18e0
Outcome
root potassium and sugar contente0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest content of root potassium and sugar content was observed in the transplanting system sown on April 18”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1147 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–76 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dorotea sown March 29 had the highest root yield.

Material
Doroteae0
Treatment
sowing time of March 29e0
Outcome
root yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest root yield was observed in the Dorotea cultivar, with a sowing time of March 29”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1240 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–76 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Bukan, Dorotea under transplanting had the highest sugar content.

Material
Doroteae0
Treatment
transplanting systeme0
Outcome
sugar contente0
Direction
higheste0
Setting
Bukan areae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest sugar content was found in the Bukan area's Dorotea cultivar in the transplanting system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1422 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplanting on March 29 at Bukan gave the highest sugar yield.

Treatment
transplanting system on March 29e0
Outcome
sugar yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Setting
Bukan areae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest sugar yield was related to the transplanting system on March 29 in the Bukan area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1437–1526 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–76 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend early March 29 sowing, transplanting and Dorotea to improve economic traits.

Outcome
early sowing time (March 29), transplanting, and Dorotea varietye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an early sowing time (March 29), transplanting, and Dorotea variety were identified as the most appropriate treatments to improve the economic traits of sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1550–1713 · show in text ↑

transplanting · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

sowing time · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

transplanting · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

sowing time · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 6 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.