Abstract
SUGAR beet (Beta vulgaris L.) is the second source of sugar around the world after sugar cane. The experiment was carried out in the Research Farm , Faculty of Agriculture, Sohag University, in two successive seasons of 2016/2017 and 2017/2018 to study the effect of Nano-micronutrients fertilizer on yield and quality of sugar beet varieties under normal and late sowing conditions. The results showed the early sowing at 21st October increased the root, quality, sugar and root yields comparing with the late sowing at 21st November in both seasons. The foliar application of Nano fertilizer treatments affected significantly all studied traits, the foliar application at 60 days after sowing exhibited the higher values of all studied traits comparing with both of foliar application at 105 days and non-fertilizer in both seasons. The four sugar beet varieties (Nabila, Karta, Kosmas and Tesla) differed significantly on all studied traits in the two seasons. Tesla variety was superior than the others of all studied traits. All interaction effects showed significant differences for root fresh weight, sucrose, TSS, purity, root and sugar yields. The highest sucrose % (18.32 and 18.42%) and sugar yield (5.20 and 5.83ton/fed) were obtained from Tesla variety with Nano-fertilized at 60 days from sowing of early sowing in 21st October in 2016/2017 and 2017/2018 seasons respectively. According to principal component analysis, the most appropriate sugar beet varieties for selecting of sugar yield was Tesla variety under the most treatments of foliar Nano- micronutrients in both environments (stable genotype and recommended for the test environments), especially under D1 (sowing at 21 October ) and F2 (spraying time of 60 day after planting).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
October sowing increased root, quality, sugar and root yields versus November sowing in both seasons.
- Taxon
- Beta vulgaris L.
Beta vulgarise1 - Treatment
- early sowing at 21st Octobere0
- Outcome
- root, quality, sugar and root yieldse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- in both seasonse0
- Comparator
- late sowing at 21st Novembere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the early sowing at 21st October increased the root, quality, sugar and root yields comparing with the late sowing at 21st November in both seasons”
e1“Beta vulgaris L.”
Claim · model-written summary
Nano fertilizer spraying at 60 days gave higher values for all studied traits than spraying at 105 days or no fertilizer.
- Taxon
- Beta vulgaris L.Beta vulgarise1
- Treatment
- foliar application at 60 days after sowinge0
- Outcome
- all studied traitse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- foliar application at 105 days and non-fertilizere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The foliar application of Nano fertilizer treatments affected significantly all studied traits, the foliar application at 60 days after sowing exhibited the higher values of all studied traits comparing with both of foliar application at 105 days and non-fertilizer in both seasons”
e1“Beta vulgaris L.”
Claim · model-written summary
Four sugar beet varieties differed significantly in all studied traits.
- Taxon
- Beta vulgaris L.Beta vulgarise1
- Material
- Nabila, Karta, Kosmas and Teslae0
- Outcome
- all studied traitse0
- Direction
- differede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The four sugar beet varieties (Nabila, Karta, Kosmas and Tesla) differed significantly on all studied traits in the two seasons”
e1“Beta vulgaris L.”
Claim · model-written summary
Tesla exceeded the other varieties in all studied traits.
- Taxon
- Beta vulgaris L.Beta vulgarise1
- Material
- Teslae0
- Outcome
- all studied traitse0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Comparator
- the otherse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Tesla variety was superior than the others of all studied traits”
e1“Beta vulgaris L.”
Claim · model-written summary
Interaction effects differed significantly for root fresh weight, sucrose and TSS.
- Taxon
- Beta vulgaris L.Beta vulgarise1
- Treatment
- interaction effectse0
- Outcome
- root fresh weight, sucrose, TSSe0
- Direction
- differencese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“All interaction effects showed significant differences for root fresh weight, sucrose, TSS, purity, root and sugar yields”
e1“Beta vulgaris L.”
Claim · model-written summary
Interaction effects differed significantly for purity, root yield and sugar yield.
- Taxon
- Beta vulgaris L.Beta vulgarise1
- Treatment
- interaction effectse0
- Outcome
- purity, root and sugar yieldse0
- Direction
- differencese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“All interaction effects showed significant differences for root fresh weight, sucrose, TSS, purity, root and sugar yields”
e1“Beta vulgaris L.”
Claim · model-written summary
Tesla with early sowing and nano fertilizer at 60 days had the highest sucrose percentages of 18.32 and 18.42%.
- Taxon
- Beta vulgaris L.Beta vulgarise1
- Material
- Teslae0
- Treatment
- Nano-fertilized at 60 days from sowing of early sowing in 21st Octobere0
- Outcome
- sucrose %e0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 18.32 and 18.42%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest sucrose % (18.32 and 18.42%) and sugar yield (5.20 and 5.83ton/fed) were obtained from Tesla variety with Nano-fertilized at 60 days from sowing of early sowing in 21st October”
e1“Beta vulgaris L.”
Claim · model-written summary
Tesla with early sowing and nano fertilizer at 60 days had the highest sugar yields of 5.20 and 5.83ton/fed.
- Taxon
- Beta vulgaris L.Beta vulgarise1
- Material
- Teslae0
- Treatment
- Nano-fertilized at 60 days from sowing of early sowing in 21st Octobere0
- Outcome
- sugar yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 5.20 and 5.83ton/fede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest sucrose % (18.32 and 18.42%) and sugar yield (5.20 and 5.83ton/fed) were obtained from Tesla variety with Nano-fertilized at 60 days from sowing of early sowing in 21st October”
e1“Beta vulgaris L.”
Claim · model-written summary
Principal component analysis identified Tesla as a stable genotype suitable for sugar-yield selection across most treatments.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0 - Material
- Teslae0
- Outcome
- selecting of sugar yielde0
- Comparator
- most appropriatee0
Not reportedValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“According to principal component analysis, the most appropriate sugar beet varieties for selecting of sugar yield was Tesla variety under the most treatments of foliar Nano- micronutrients in both environments (stable genotype and recommended for the test environments)”
The same questions in other papers
sowing time · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →sowing time · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →nanoparticle · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →sowing time · quality: general · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →nanoparticle · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree
11 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.