Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Tesla with early sowing and nano fertilizer at 60 days had the highest sugar yields of 5.20 and 5.83ton/fed.

A claim from Effect of Nano-micronutrients Fertilization on Yield and Quality of some Sugar Beet Varieties under Early and Late Sowing Dates · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tesla with early sowing and nano fertilizer at 60 days had the highest sugar yields of 5.20 and 5.83ton/fed.

Taxon
Beta vulgaris L.Beta vulgarise1
Material
Teslae0
Treatment
Nano-fertilized at 60 days from sowing of early sowing in 21st Octobere0
Outcome
sugar yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
5.20 and 5.83ton/fede0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest sucrose % (18.32 and 18.42%) and sugar yield (5.20 and 5.83ton/fed) were obtained from Tesla variety with Nano-fertilized at 60 days from sowing of early sowing in 21st October”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1341
e1

“Beta vulgaris L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–28

Title

Effect of Nano-micronutrients Fertilization on Yield and Quality of some Sugar Beet Varieties under Early and Late Sowing Dates

Yasser A. M. Hefny; Alaa A. Said Egyptian Journal of Agronomy 2021. doi:10.21608/agro.2021.45324.1235

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-039e1b3e4ff2a1039deaf1c2b4782ceaf1c8ec90e370b5009a2b7d94da893253 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

sowing time · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 6 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. positive
  8. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.