Paper · 2022 · Plants

Nutritional Parameters, Biomass Production, and Antioxidant Activity of Festuca arundinacea Schreb. Conditioned with Selenium Nanoparticles

Uriel González-Lemus; Gabriela Medina-Pérez; José J. Espino-García; et al.

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Festuca arundinacea Schreb. is a widely used type of forage due to its great ecological breadth and adaptability. An agricultural intervention that improves the selenium content in cultivated plants has been defined as bio-fortification, a complementary strategy to improve human and non-human animals’ nutrition. The advancement of science has led to an increased number of studies based on nanotechnologies, such as the development of nanoparticles (NPs) and their application in crop plants. Studies show that NPs have different physicochemical properties compared to bulk materials. The objectives of this study were (1) to determine the behavior of F. arundinacea Schreb. plants cultivated with Se nanoparticles, (2) to identify the specific behavior of the agronomic and productive variables of the F. arundinacea Schreb. plants, and (3) to quantify the production and quality of the forage produced from the plant (the bioactive compounds’ concentrations, antioxidant activity, and the concentration of selenium). Three different treatments of SeNPs were established (0, 1.5, 3.0, and 4.5 mg/mL). The effects of a foliar fertilization with SeNPs on the morphological parameters such as the root size, plant height, and biomass production were recorded, as well as the effects on the physicochemical parameters such as the crude protein (CP), lipids (L), crude fiber (CF), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), carbohydrates (CH), the content of total phenols, total flavonoids, tannins, quantification of selenium and antioxidant activity 2,2′-Azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS), and 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH). Significant differences (p < 0.05) were found between treatments in all the response variables. The best results were obtained with foliar application treatments with 3.0 and 4.5 mg/mL with respect to the root size (12.79 and 15.59 cm) and plant height (26.18 and 29.34 cm). The F. arundinacea Schreb. plants fertilized with 4.5 mg/L had selenium contents of 0.3215, 0.3191, and 0.3218 mg/Kg MS; total phenols of 249.56, 280.02, and 274 mg EAG/100 g DM; and total flavonoids of 63.56, 64.96, and 61.16 mg QE/100 g DM. The foliar biofortified treatment with a concentration of 4.5 mg/mL Se NPs had the highest antioxidant capacities (284.26, 278.35, and 289.96 mg/AAE/100 g).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Significant differences between SeNP treatments were found in all response variables of Festuca arundinacea

Taxon
Festuca arundinacea Schreb.Lolium arundinaceume0
Treatment
SeNPse2
Outcome
all the response variablese1
Qualifier
Significant differences (p < 0.05)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Festuca arundinacea Schreb. is a widely used type of forage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–59 · show in text ↑
e1

“Significant differences (p < 0.05) were found between treatments in all the response variables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1672–1766 · show in text ↑
e2

“Three different treatments of SeNPs were established (0, 1.5, 3.0, and 4.5 mg/mL)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar SeNPs at 3.0 and 4.5 mg/mL gave the best root size, 12.79 and 15.59 cm

Taxon
Festuca arundinacea Schreb.Lolium arundinaceume0
Treatment
foliar application treatments with 3.0 and 4.5 mg/mLe3
Outcome
root sizee3
Direction
beste3
Value
12.79 and 15.59 cme3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Festuca arundinacea Schreb. is a widely used type of forage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–59 · show in text ↑
e3

“The best results were obtained with foliar application treatments with 3.0 and 4.5 mg/mL with respect to the root size (12.79 and 15.59 cm) and plant height (26.18 and 29.34 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1768–1945 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar SeNPs at 3.0 and 4.5 mg/mL gave the best plant height, 26.18 and 29.34 cm

Taxon
Festuca arundinacea Schreb.Lolium arundinaceume0
Treatment
foliar application treatments with 3.0 and 4.5 mg/mLe3
Outcome
plant heighte3
Direction
beste3
Value
26.18 and 29.34 cme3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Festuca arundinacea Schreb. is a widely used type of forage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–59 · show in text ↑
e3

“The best results were obtained with foliar application treatments with 3.0 and 4.5 mg/mL with respect to the root size (12.79 and 15.59 cm) and plant height (26.18 and 29.34 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1768–1945 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants fertilized with 4.5 mg/L had selenium contents of 0.3215, 0.3191 and 0.3218 mg/Kg MS

Taxon
F. arundinacea Schreb.Lolium arundinaceume4
Treatment
fertilized with 4.5 mg/Le4
Outcome
selenium contentse4
Value
0.3215, 0.3191, and 0.3218 mg/Kg MSe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Festuca arundinacea Schreb. is a widely used type of forage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–59 · show in text ↑
e4

“The F. arundinacea Schreb. plants fertilized with 4.5 mg/L had selenium contents of 0.3215, 0.3191, and 0.3218 mg/Kg MS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1947–2066 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants fertilized with 4.5 mg/L had total phenols of 249.56, 280.02 and 274 mg EAG/100 g DM

Taxon
F. arundinacea Schreb.Lolium arundinaceume4
Treatment
fertilized with 4.5 mg/Le4
Outcome
total phenolse5
Value
249.56, 280.02, and 274 mg EAG/100 g DMe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The F. arundinacea Schreb. plants fertilized with 4.5 mg/L had selenium contents of 0.3215, 0.3191, and 0.3218 mg/Kg MS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1947–2066 · show in text ↑
e5

“total phenols of 249.56, 280.02, and 274 mg EAG/100 g DM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2068–2124 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants fertilized with 4.5 mg/L had total flavonoids of 63.56, 64.96 and 61.16 mg QE/100 g DM

Taxon
F. arundinacea Schreb.Lolium arundinaceume4
Treatment
fertilized with 4.5 mg/Le4
Outcome
total flavonoidse6
Value
63.56, 64.96, and 61.16 mg QE/100 g DMe6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The F. arundinacea Schreb. plants fertilized with 4.5 mg/L had selenium contents of 0.3215, 0.3191, and 0.3218 mg/Kg MS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1947–2066 · show in text ↑
e6

“total flavonoids of 63.56, 64.96, and 61.16 mg QE/100 g DM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2130–2188 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The foliar biofortified treatment with 4.5 mg/mL Se NPs gave the highest antioxidant capacities

Taxon
Festuca arundinacea Schreb.Lolium arundinaceume0
Treatment
foliar biofortified treatment with a concentration of 4.5 mg/mL Se NPse7
Outcome
antioxidant capacitiese7
Direction
higheste7
Value
284.26, 278.35, and 289.96 mg/AAE/100 ge7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Festuca arundinacea Schreb. is a widely used type of forage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–59 · show in text ↑
e7

“The foliar biofortified treatment with a concentration of 4.5 mg/mL Se NPs had the highest antioxidant capacities (284.26, 278.35, and 289.96 mg/AAE/100 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2190–2345 · show in text ↑

application · growth · Lolium arundinaceum (tall fescue)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.