Abstract
Abstract (2-Chloroethyl)phosphonic acid (ethephon) applied as a dip at 10000 ppm accelerated the ripening of unripe harvested processing tomatoes for juice. Overall processing yield was increased without adversely affecting juice quality.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Ethephon dip at 10000 ppm accelerated ripening of unripe harvested processing tomatoes for juice.
- Taxon
- processing tomatoese0
- Organ / stage
- unripe harvestede0
- Treatment
- (2-Chloroethyl)phosphonic acid (ethephon) applied as a dip at 10000 ppme0
- Outcome
- ripeninge0
- Direction
- acceleratede0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“(2-Chloroethyl)phosphonic acid (ethephon) applied as a dip at 10000 ppm accelerated the ripening of unripe harvested processing tomatoes for juice”
Claim · model-written summary
Ethephon dip increased overall processing yield of processing tomatoes.
- Taxon
- processing tomatoese0
- Treatment
- (2-Chloroethyl)phosphonic acid (ethephon) applied as a dip at 10000 ppme0
- Outcome
- processing yielde1
- Direction
- increasede1
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“(2-Chloroethyl)phosphonic acid (ethephon) applied as a dip at 10000 ppm accelerated the ripening of unripe harvested processing tomatoes for juice”
e1“Overall processing yield was increased”
Claim · model-written summary
Ethephon dip did not adversely affect juice quality of processing tomatoes.
- Taxon
- processing tomatoese0
- Treatment
- (2-Chloroethyl)phosphonic acid (ethephon) applied as a dip at 10000 ppme0
- Outcome
- juice qualitye2
- Direction
- without adversely affectinge2
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“(2-Chloroethyl)phosphonic acid (ethephon) applied as a dip at 10000 ppm accelerated the ripening of unripe harvested processing tomatoes for juice”
e2“without adversely affecting juice quality”
The same questions in other papers
(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- positive
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →phosphonic acid · quality: general · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- positive
2-chloroethyl group · quality: general · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- positive
(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · quality: general · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
20 papers more in this group
See all 24 papers →phosphonic acid · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
2-chloroethyl group · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
phosphonic acid · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.