Abstract
The field explore was completed at soil science research ranch of Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj during Rabi season 2021-22. Soil present in the region was sandy soil in surface. The plan was spread out in randomized block plan with three degrees of Organic excrements (0%, 50%, 100%) and three degrees of Inorganic composts (0%, 50%, 100%) separately. The outcomes got with treatment T9 (20:40:20 kg NPK + 5 t ha - 1 FYM + 0.4 t ha - 1 Neem cake) showed that the slight lessening in pH, and Bulk thickness, Particle thickness there is critical expansion in pore space, water holding limit, EC, natural carbon, Available Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Potassium and plant development and yield credits T9 (20:40:20 kg NPK + 5 t ha - 1 FYM + 0.4 t ha - 1 Neem cake) gave best outcomes regarding plant level, no of branches, no of pods plants, no of seeds pod-1, seed weight, absolute pod yield. No huge was seen in yield and development of chickpea taken care of and full NPK manure treatment. Application of Organic fertilizers well as it combination with full NPK consider expansion in development and complete yield ascribes of chickpea. As opposed to any remaining medicines, joint utilization of 100% Organic excrements (FYM+Neemcake) +100% NPK shows the main effect on chickpea development.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment T9 slightly lowered soil pH.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- 20:40:20 kg NPK + 5 t ha - 1 FYM + 0.4 t ha - 1 Neem cakee1
- Outcome
- pHe1
- Direction
- slight lesseninge1
- Setting
- Prayagraje0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The outcomes got with treatment T9 (20:40:20 kg NPK + 5 t ha - 1 FYM + 0.4 t ha - 1 Neem cake) showed that the slight lessening in pH”
e0“The field explore was completed at soil science research ranch of Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj”
t0“OF CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.) CV. PUSA-362”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment T9 gave critical expansion of pore space and water holding limit.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- 20:40:20 kg NPK + 5 t ha - 1 FYM + 0.4 t ha - 1 Neem cakee1
- Outcome
- pore space, water holding limite2
- Direction
- critical expansione2
- Setting
- Prayagraje0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The outcomes got with treatment T9 (20:40:20 kg NPK + 5 t ha - 1 FYM + 0.4 t ha - 1 Neem cake) showed that the slight lessening in pH”
e2“there is critical expansion in pore space, water holding limit, EC, natural carbon, Available Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Potassium”
e0“The field explore was completed at soil science research ranch of Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj”
t0“OF CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.) CV. PUSA-362”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment T9 gave critical expansion of EC, natural carbon and available nitrogen.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- 20:40:20 kg NPK + 5 t ha - 1 FYM + 0.4 t ha - 1 Neem cakee1
- Outcome
- EC, natural carbon, Available Nitrogene2
- Direction
- critical expansione2
- Setting
- Prayagraje0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The outcomes got with treatment T9 (20:40:20 kg NPK + 5 t ha - 1 FYM + 0.4 t ha - 1 Neem cake) showed that the slight lessening in pH”
e2“there is critical expansion in pore space, water holding limit, EC, natural carbon, Available Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Potassium”
e0“The field explore was completed at soil science research ranch of Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj”
t0“OF CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.) CV. PUSA-362”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment T9 gave critical expansion of available phosphorus and potassium.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- 20:40:20 kg NPK + 5 t ha - 1 FYM + 0.4 t ha - 1 Neem cakee1
- Outcome
- Phosphorus, Potassiume2
- Direction
- critical expansione2
- Setting
- Prayagraje0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The outcomes got with treatment T9 (20:40:20 kg NPK + 5 t ha - 1 FYM + 0.4 t ha - 1 Neem cake) showed that the slight lessening in pH”
e2“there is critical expansion in pore space, water holding limit, EC, natural carbon, Available Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Potassium”
e0“The field explore was completed at soil science research ranch of Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj”
t0“OF CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.) CV. PUSA-362”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment T9 gave the best plant level, branch number and pod number per plant in chickpea.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- 20:40:20 kg NPK + 5 t ha - 1 FYM + 0.4 t ha - 1 Neem cakee1
- Outcome
- plant level, no of branches, no of pods plantse3
- Direction
- best outcomese3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The outcomes got with treatment T9 (20:40:20 kg NPK + 5 t ha - 1 FYM + 0.4 t ha - 1 Neem cake) showed that the slight lessening in pH”
e3“gave best outcomes regarding plant level, no of branches, no of pods plants, no of seeds pod-1, seed weight, absolute pod yield”
t0“OF CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.) CV. PUSA-362”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment T9 gave the best seeds per pod, seed weight and absolute pod yield in chickpea.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- 20:40:20 kg NPK + 5 t ha - 1 FYM + 0.4 t ha - 1 Neem cakee1
- Outcome
- no of seeds pod-1, seed weight, absolute pod yielde3
- Direction
- best outcomese3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The outcomes got with treatment T9 (20:40:20 kg NPK + 5 t ha - 1 FYM + 0.4 t ha - 1 Neem cake) showed that the slight lessening in pH”
e3“gave best outcomes regarding plant level, no of branches, no of pods plants, no of seeds pod-1, seed weight, absolute pod yield”
t0“OF CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.) CV. PUSA-362”
Claim · model-written summary
Chickpea yield and development under organic manure with NPK did not differ from the full NPK manure treatment.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Outcome
- yield and developmente4
- Qualifier
- No huge was seene4
- Comparator
- full NPK manure treatmente4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“No huge was seen in yield and development of chickpea taken care of and full NPK manure treatment”
t0“OF CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.) CV. PUSA-362”
Claim · model-written summary
Joint use of 100% organic manures (FYM+Neemcake) with 100% NPK shows the main effect on chickpea development.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- 100% Organic excrements (FYM+Neemcake) +100% NPKe5
- Outcome
- chickpea developmente5
- Direction
- shows the main effecte5
- Comparator
- any remaining medicinese5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“As opposed to any remaining medicines, joint utilization of 100% Organic excrements (FYM+Neemcake) +100% NPK shows the main effect on chickpea development”
t0“OF CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.) CV. PUSA-362”
The same questions in other papers
botanical · soil: chemistry · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
fertilization · soil: chemistry · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →botanical · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
36 papers more in this group
See all 40 papers →botanical · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
68 papers more in this group
See all 72 papers →fertilization · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
98 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
101 papers more in this group
See all 105 papers →fertilization · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
325 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
341 papers more in this group
See all 345 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.