Paper · 2022 · International Journal of Environment and Climate Change

Evaluation of the Foliar Application of Nano Urea on the Performance of Rabi Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)

G. Manoj Kumar Goud; Kasbe Sudhanshu Sudhakar; Md. Latheef Pasha; et al.

4
claims
4
verbatim quotes
7
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A study was conducted on clayey soils (vertisols) of southern Telangana zone (India) characterized by low soil organic carbon, low available nitrogen and medium available phosphorous (P) and high available potassium (K). The experiment involving seven nitrogen (N) management practices (T1 to T7) involving recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) as soil application, varied rates of foliar application of nano urea (liquid) was laid out in randomized block design replicated thrice. All the treatments were supplied with basal 50% of soil applied urea fertilizer at the time of sowing except in T1 (No nitrogen application) treatment. Results revealed that application of recommended dose of fertilizers in three splits as soil application resulted into significantly highest growth, yield ( 1774 kg) and yield attributes of sunflower, and was found profitable (Benefit:Cost ratio = 3.47) over foliar application of varied rates of nano- urea spray. Foliar application of nano urea @ 2-4 ml L-1 in T3 to T7 treatments could significantly improve growth and yield of sunflower (by 546 to 744 kg) when compared to no nitrogen application treatment. However foliar application of nano urea showed significantly lesser growth and yield compared to soil application of RDF in three splits in rabi sunflower.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil application of the recommended fertilizer dose in three splits gave the highest sunflower growth, yield and yield attributes relative to foliar nano urea.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
application of recommended dose of fertilizers in three splits as soil applicatione0
Outcome
growth, yield ( 1774 kg) and yield attributese0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1774 kge0
Comparator
foliar application of varied rates of nano- urea spraye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of recommended dose of fertilizers in three splits as soil application resulted into significantly highest growth, yield ( 1774 kg) and yield attributes of sunflower, and was found profitable (Benefit:Cost ratio = 3.47) over foliar application of varied rates of nano- urea spray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–947 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil application of the recommended fertilizer dose had a benefit:cost ratio of 3.47 and was profitable relative to foliar nano urea.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
application of recommended dose of fertilizers in three splits as soil applicatione0
Outcome
Benefit:Cost ratioe0
Direction
profitablee0
Value
3.47e0
Comparator
foliar application of varied rates of nano- urea spraye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of recommended dose of fertilizers in three splits as soil application resulted into significantly highest growth, yield ( 1774 kg) and yield attributes of sunflower, and was found profitable (Benefit:Cost ratio = 3.47) over foliar application of varied rates of nano- urea spray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–947 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nano urea at 2–4 ml L-1 significantly improved sunflower growth and yield over no nitrogen.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
Foliar application of nano urea @ 2-4 ml L-1e0
Outcome
growth and yielde0
Direction
improvee0
Value
546 to 744 kge0
Comparator
no nitrogen application treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of nano urea @ 2-4 ml L-1 in T3 to T7 treatments could significantly improve growth and yield of sunflower (by 546 to 744 kg) when compared to no nitrogen application treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nano urea produced significantly less sunflower growth and yield than soil RDF in three splits.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
foliar application of nano ureae0
Outcome
growth and yielde0
Direction
lessere0
Comparator
soil application of RDF in three splitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of nano urea showed significantly lesser growth and yield compared to soil application of RDF in three splits in rabi sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1300 · show in text ↑

application · yield · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

158 papers: 152 positive, 6 negative or no effect

151 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

154 papers more in this group

See all 158 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

196 papers: 182 positive, 14 negative or no effect

181 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

192 papers more in this group

See all 196 papers →

fertilization · yield · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

365 papers: 344 positive, 21 negative or no effect

343 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

361 papers more in this group

See all 365 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results agree

36 papers: 36 positive, 0 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.