Paper · 2022 · Agriculture

Ascorbate Supplementation: A Blessing in Disguise for Tomato Seedlings Exposed to NiO Nanoparticles

Sofia Spormann; Filipa Sousa; Fátima Oliveira; et al.

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
5
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

While nanomaterials offer wide-ranging solutions, their intensified use causes environmental contamination, posing ecotoxicological risks to several organisms, including plants. It becomes important to understand the phytotoxicity of NMs and find sustainable strategies to enhance plant tolerance to these emerging contaminants. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the potential of ascorbic acid (AsA) in increasing the tolerance of in vitro grown tomato seedlings to nickel oxide nanomaterials (nano-NiO). Seeds of Solanum lycopersicum cv. Micro-Tom were germinated in culture medium containing 30 mg/L nano-NiO, 150 mg/L AsA, or a combination of both. A control situation was included. Surprisingly, single AsA administration in the medium impaired the growth of tomato seedlings and increased the lipid peroxidation of biomembranes. Nonetheless, plant development was more severely repressed by nano-NiO, with evident macroscopic effects that did not translate into serious redox disorders. Still, proline and AsA levels diminished in response to nano-NiO, while glutathione and phenols increased. Despite the negative effects of AsA on non-stressed plants, nano-NiO-induced stress was counteracted by AsA supply, with enhanced levels of glutathione and phenols. Overall, the supplementation with AsA proved to be a “blessing in disguise” for plants under nano-NiO-induced stress, improving antioxidant capacity and activating other defense mechanisms.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascorbic acid alone impaired tomato seedling growth.

Taxon
tomato seedlingsSolanum lycopersicume0
Treatment
AsAe0
Outcome
growth of tomato seedlingse0
Direction
impairede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“single AsA administration in the medium impaired the growth of tomato seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–780 · show in text ↑
e1

“150 mg/L AsA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–625 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascorbic acid alone increased membrane lipid peroxidation.

Taxon
Tomato SeedlingsSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
AsAe0
Outcome
lipid peroxidation of biomembranese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“single AsA administration in the medium impaired the growth of tomato seedlings and increased the lipid peroxidation of biomembranes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–833 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano-NiO more severely repressed plant development.

Taxon
Tomato SeedlingsSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
nano-NiOe0
Outcome
plant developmente0
Direction
repressede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“plant development was more severely repressed by nano-NiO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–905 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano-NiO reduced proline and ascorbic acid levels.

Taxon
Tomato SeedlingsSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
nano-NiOe0
Outcome
proline and AsA levelse0
Direction
diminishede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“proline and AsA levels diminished in response to nano-NiO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1057 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano-NiO increased glutathione and phenols.

Taxon
Tomato SeedlingsSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
nano-NiOe1
Outcome
glutathione and phenolse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“glutathione and phenols increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1098 · show in text ↑
e1

“in response to nano-NiO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1057 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascorbic acid counteracted nano-NiO stress and enhanced glutathione and phenols.

Taxon
Tomato SeedlingsSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
AsA supplye0
Outcome
levels of glutathione and phenolse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“nano-NiO-induced stress was counteracted by AsA supply, with enhanced levels of glutathione and phenols”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1263 · show in text ↑

L-ascorbic acid · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

L-ascorbic acid · physiology: oxidative · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

L-ascorbic acid · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: osmolytes · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

100 papers: 94 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 94 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

96 papers more in this group

See all 100 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.