Abstract
Abstract. Present study was conducted to investigation the influence of salinity and drought stresses on germination and growing parameters in the wheat (T. aestivum L.) Cultivar (chamran). This experiment was carried out in completely randomized factorial form with three replications in laboratory condition at the initial stage of growing. Treatments were supplied to use of sodium chloride(Na+Cl-) and polyethylene glycol 6000 (PEG) solutions in order to impose the salinity and drought stress, which were including control (without sodium chloride) osmotic potentials 75, 150 and 200 mmol/l and control ( without polyethylene glycol) osmotic potentials -0.4, -0.8 and -1.2 bar, respectively. Results indicated that the influence of salinity and drought DOP (different osmotic potential) on the root length, Shoot length, fresh root mass and fresh shoot mass, root dry mass, shoot dry mass, compared to the control were not significant (P≥0.05).the influence of the salinity and drought DOP on germination percentage were not significant. Both of OP (osmotic potential) had no influence on germination rate.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Salinity and drought osmotic potentials did not significantly change wheat root length or shoot length compared with the control.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- salinity and drought DOPe1
- Outcome
- root length, Shoot lengthe1
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede1
- Comparator
- the controle1
- Setting
- laboratory conditione3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“wheat (T. aestivum L.) Cultivar (chamran)”
e1“Results indicated that the influence of salinity and drought DOP (different osmotic potential) on the root length, Shoot length, fresh root mass and fresh shoot mass, root dry mass, shoot dry mass, compared to the control were not significant (P≥0.05)”
e3“This experiment was carried out in completely randomized factorial form with three replications in laboratory condition at the initial stage of growing”
Claim · model-written summary
Salinity and drought osmotic potentials did not significantly change fresh root and shoot mass of wheat compared with the control.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- salinity and drought DOPe1
- Outcome
- fresh root mass and fresh shoot masse1
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede1
- Comparator
- the controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“wheat (T. aestivum L.) Cultivar (chamran)”
e1“Results indicated that the influence of salinity and drought DOP (different osmotic potential) on the root length, Shoot length, fresh root mass and fresh shoot mass, root dry mass, shoot dry mass, compared to the control were not significant (P≥0.05)”
Claim · model-written summary
Salinity and drought osmotic potentials did not significantly change root dry mass and shoot dry mass of wheat compared with the control.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- salinity and drought DOPe1
- Outcome
- root dry mass, shoot dry masse1
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede1
- Comparator
- the controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“wheat (T. aestivum L.) Cultivar (chamran)”
e1“Results indicated that the influence of salinity and drought DOP (different osmotic potential) on the root length, Shoot length, fresh root mass and fresh shoot mass, root dry mass, shoot dry mass, compared to the control were not significant (P≥0.05)”
Claim · model-written summary
Salinity and drought osmotic potentials did not significantly change wheat germination percentage compared with the control.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- salinity and drought DOPe2
- Outcome
- germination percentagee2
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede2
- Comparator
- the controle1
- Setting
- laboratory conditione3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“wheat (T. aestivum L.) Cultivar (chamran)”
e1“Results indicated that the influence of salinity and drought DOP (different osmotic potential) on the root length, Shoot length, fresh root mass and fresh shoot mass, root dry mass, shoot dry mass, compared to the control were not significant (P≥0.05)”
e2“the influence of the salinity and drought DOP on germination percentage were not significant”
e3“This experiment was carried out in completely randomized factorial form with three replications in laboratory condition at the initial stage of growing”
Claim · model-written summary
Osmotic potential had no influence on wheat germination rate.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- osmotic potentiale4
- Outcome
- germination ratee4
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“wheat (T. aestivum L.) Cultivar (chamran)”
e4“Both of OP (osmotic potential) had no influence on germination rate”
The same questions in other papers
salinity · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
327 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
373 papers more in this group
See all 377 papers →drought · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
344 papers in the same direction as this paper · 86 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
427 papers more in this group
See all 431 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.