Paper · 2002 · Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology /Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology

IMPACT OF FIVE PLANT EXTRACTS ALONE AND IN COMBINATION WITH OXAMYL ON Rotylenchulus reniformis INFECTING TOMATO.

A. Khalil

9
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The effect of root dip-treatment with aqueous leaf extracts of pomegranate. Punica granatum; olive, Olea euroba; castor. Ricinus communis; Mango, Manfjfera indica and peach. Prunus persica either alone or integrated with Oxamyl were carried out under greenhouse conditions to compare their effectiveness against R. raniformis infecting tomato CN. Strain-B3 as well as plant growth response. Results illustrated that most treatments proved to be more effective in improving tomato plant growth to certain extent, exceeded that of nematode alone (2.63). R. communis Integrated with Oxamyl treatment proved to be the best in promoting the fresh weight of the whole plant followed by R. communis alone, P. granatum + Oxamyl and then M. indica plus Oxamyl treatment. Their percentages of increase were 63.56 %. 63.14 %, 55.08 % and 54.66 %, respectively. All treatments showed significant reduction in total number of reniform nematode in soil and roots of tomato with rate of nematode build-up ranged from 0.180 for Oxamyl to 0.256 for P. persica. Egg-masses numbers of R. reniformis on tomato plant were significantly reduced in all treatments as compared with nematode alone.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most treatments improved tomato growth relative to nematode alone.

Treatment
most treatmentse0
Outcome
tomato plant growthe0
Direction
improvinge0
Qualifier
2.63e0
Comparator
nematode alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“most treatments proved to be more effective in improving tomato plant growth to certain extent, exceeded that of nematode alone (2.63).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–551 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Castor extract with Oxamyl increased whole-plant fresh weight by 63.56%.

Treatment
R. communis Integrated with Oxamyle0
Outcome
fresh weight of the whole plante0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
63.56 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“R. communis Integrated with Oxamyl treatment proved to be the best in promoting the fresh weight of the whole plant followed by R. communis alone, P. granatum + Oxamyl and then M. indica plus Oxamyl treatment. Their percentages of increase were 63.56 %. 63.14 %, 55.08 % and 54.66 %, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–849 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Castor extract alone increased whole-plant fresh weight by 63.14%.

Treatment
R. communis alonee0
Outcome
fresh weight of the whole plante0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
63.14 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“R. communis Integrated with Oxamyl treatment proved to be the best in promoting the fresh weight of the whole plant followed by R. communis alone, P. granatum + Oxamyl and then M. indica plus Oxamyl treatment. Their percentages of increase were 63.56 %. 63.14 %, 55.08 % and 54.66 %, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–849 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pomegranate extract with Oxamyl increased whole-plant fresh weight by 55.08%.

Treatment
P. granatum + Oxamyle0
Outcome
fresh weight of the whole plante0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
55.08 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“R. communis Integrated with Oxamyl treatment proved to be the best in promoting the fresh weight of the whole plant followed by R. communis alone, P. granatum + Oxamyl and then M. indica plus Oxamyl treatment. Their percentages of increase were 63.56 %. 63.14 %, 55.08 % and 54.66 %, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–849 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mango extract with Oxamyl increased whole-plant fresh weight by 54.66%.

Treatment
M. indica plus Oxamyle0
Outcome
fresh weight of the whole plante0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
54.66 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“R. communis Integrated with Oxamyl treatment proved to be the best in promoting the fresh weight of the whole plant followed by R. communis alone, P. granatum + Oxamyl and then M. indica plus Oxamyl treatment. Their percentages of increase were 63.56 %. 63.14 %, 55.08 % and 54.66 %, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–849 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All treatments significantly reduced reniform nematodes in tomato soil and roots.

Treatment
All treatmentse0
Interactor
reniform nematodee0pest
Outcome
total number of reniform nematode in soil and roots of tomatoe0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All treatments showed significant reduction in total number of reniform nematode in soil and roots of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–958 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oxamyl had a nematode build-up rate of 0.180.

Treatment
Oxamyle0
Outcome
rate of nematode build-upe0
Value
0.180e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rate of nematode build-up ranged from 0.180 for Oxamyl to 0.256 for P. persica.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1043 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–111 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peach extract had a nematode build-up rate of 0.256.

Treatment
P. persicae0
Outcome
rate of nematode build-upe0
Value
0.256e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rate of nematode build-up ranged from 0.180 for Oxamyl to 0.256 for P. persica.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1043 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All treatments significantly reduced reniform nematode egg masses relative to nematode alone.

Treatment
all treatmentse0
Interactor
R. reniformisRotylenchulus reniformise0pest
Outcome
Egg-masses numbers of R. reniformis on tomato plante0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
nematode alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rotylenchulus reniformis
Rotylenchulus reniformis · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryScot Nelson · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Egg-masses numbers of R. reniformis on tomato plant were significantly reduced in all treatments as compared with nematode alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1173 · show in text ↑

oxamyl · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 7 positive, 4 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Punica granatum · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Ricinus communis · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.