Paper · 2022 · Bangladesh Journal of Botany

Effects of Drought Stress On Growth, Photosynthesis And Ultrstructure of Mesophyll Cell of Ulmus Szechuanica Fang Seedlings

Yaqin Jin; Junli Chang; Ying Shi; et al.

9
claims
9
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Effects of drought stress on growth, photosynthesis and ultrastructure of mesophyll cells of Ulmus szechuanica Fang seedlings were studied. Results showed that under drought stress both leaf water content (LWC) and relative water content (RWC) decreased significantly and height growth (GH) and base diameter growth (GD) declined. Pn, Tr, Gs, Ci and Ls were significantly affected by water deficit. With the continuing of drought, Pn decreased significantly, the change of Gs, Ci, Tr was same. There existed significant effects of drought on stomatal density (SD), stomatal length (SL), stomatal width (SW), individual stomatal area (As) and percentage of individual stomatal area (At) too. Under drought condition, change of structure and chloroplast morphology of the leaves was evident, the number of chloroplasts and orophil granules increased, their proportion in cells amplified. The number of starch granules became smaller, the arrangement of thylakoids among chloroplasts swollen and tend to be disordered. Bangladesh J. Bot. 51(3): 461-468, 2022 (September)

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought significantly decreased leaf and relative water content.

Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
leaf water content (LWC) and relative water content (RWC)e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“under drought stress both leaf water content (LWC) and relative water content (RWC) decreased significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 160–267 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced height and basal-diameter growth.

Outcome
height growth (GH) and base diameter growth (GD)e0
Direction
declinede0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“height growth (GH) and base diameter growth (GD) declined.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–330 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit significantly affected Pn, Tr, Gs, Ci and Ls.

Treatment
water deficite0
Outcome
Pn, Tr, Gs, Ci and Lse0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Pn, Tr, Gs, Ci and Ls were significantly affected by water deficit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–398 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pn, Gs, Ci and Tr fell as drought continued.

Treatment
continuing of droughte0
Outcome
Pne0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“With the continuing of drought, Pn decreased significantly, the change of Gs, Ci, Tr was same.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–493 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought significantly affected stomatal density, size, and area measures.

Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
stomatal density (SD), stomatal length (SL), stomatal width (SW)e0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“There existed significant effects of drought on stomatal density (SD), stomatal length (SL), stomatal width (SW), individual stomatal area (As) and percentage of individual stomatal area (At) too.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–690 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought visibly altered leaf structure and chloroplast morphology.

Treatment
drought conditione0
Outcome
change of structure and chloroplast morphology of the leavese0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Under drought condition, change of structure and chloroplast morphology of the leaves was evident”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–788 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chloroplast and orophil granule numbers and cellular proportion increased under drought.

Outcome
number of chloroplasts and orophil granulese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the number of chloroplasts and orophil granules increased, their proportion in cells amplified.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–885 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Starch granule number decreased under drought.

Outcome
number of starch granulese0
Direction
smallere0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The number of starch granules became smaller”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–930 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thylakoid arrangements swelled and became disordered under drought.

Outcome
arrangement of thylakoids among chloroplasts swollen and tend to be disorderede0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“the arrangement of thylakoids among chloroplasts swollen and tend to be disordered.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1015 · show in text ↑