Paper · 1977 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Electrical Conductivity of ‘Shamouti’ Orange Peel during Fruit Growth and Postharvest Senescence1

Alegre Sasson; Shaul P. Monselise

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
18
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Electrical conductivity (EC) measurements were carried out in orange ( Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck) peel (with stainless steel electrodes penetrating 2 mm deep), during fruit growth and subsequent prolonged storage on shelf. Values at the equator were quite generally lower than at the stem and especially at the stylar ends. A curve showing two maxima, one at a very young fruitlet stage (late May) and the other two months before maturation was found. The decrease in EC toward maturation continued for some time postharvest while the water content of tissues decreased, but was followed by an increase with progressive tissue senescence. This last part of the curve is tentatively explained by an increased role of symplast conductance due to tissue aging.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peel conductivity at the equator was generally lower than at stem and stylar ends.

Taxon
oranget0
Organ / stage
peelt0
Outcome
Valuese0
Direction
lowere0

Verbatim

e0

“Values at the equator were quite generally lower than at the stem and especially at the stylar ends.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–334 · show in text ↑
t0

“Orange Peel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Orange peel conductivity had maxima at a young fruitlet stage and two months before maturation.

Taxon
Oranget0
Outcome
two maximae0
Direction
maximae0

Verbatim

e0

“A curve showing two maxima, one at a very young fruitlet stage (late May) and the other two months before maturation was found.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–462 · show in text ↑
t0

“Orange Peel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conductivity decreased toward maturation and continued decreasing briefly postharvest.

Taxon
Oranget0
Outcome
ECe0
Direction
decreasee0

Verbatim

e0

“The decrease in EC toward maturation continued for some time postharvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–535 · show in text ↑
t0

“Orange Peel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water content decreased during the postharvest interval.

Taxon
Oranget0
Outcome
water content of tissuese0
Direction
decreasede0

Verbatim

e0

“the water content of tissues decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–580 · show in text ↑
t0

“Orange Peel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conductivity subsequently increased with progressive tissue senescence.

Taxon
Oranget0
Outcome
ECe1
Direction
increasee0

Verbatim

e0

“was followed by an increase with progressive tissue senescence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–648 · show in text ↑
t0

“Orange Peel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–49 · show in text ↑
e1

“Electrical conductivity (EC) measurements were carried out in orange ( Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck) peel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–113 · show in text ↑