Paper · 2022 · 2022 IEEE 8th International Conference on Smart Instrumentation, Measurement and Applications (ICSIMA)

Automatic Watering System for Smart Agriculture using ESP32 Platform

Teddy Surya Gunawan; Nur Najiehah Kamarudin; Mira Kartiwi; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Agriculture can be transformed into smart agriculture due to the advanced wireless network and the Internet of Things (IoT). As the human population increases, so does the demand for crops. With real-time monitoring, a smart agriculture system’s awareness of soil moisture measurement, humidity, and environmental temperature will increase food security. In addition, smart agriculture can increase crop yield, reduce water waste, and boost productivity. In light of this, this study proposes smart agriculture, which employs sensor-based monitoring in real-time without human intervention. Users have direct access to real-time data, and all sensor data is recorded and monitored at all times and from anywhere within the internet’s coverage area. The development of a mobile application facilitates growth monitoring and user access to data. This research measures yield-affecting agricultural factors such as soil moisture, humidity, and temperature. Nonetheless, monitoring environmental factors is crucial to increasing crop yields. The experiment was conducted on two chili plants, one with an automation system and one without, which were manually watered once daily at 7:00 a.m. It is estimated that the plant with the system can maintain the optimal moisture level, whereas the other plant’s moisture measurement continues to decrease. Compared to manual watering, automatic watering also results in accelerated plant growth. Consequently, a smart agriculture system is anticipated to improve plant growth and system efficiency.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The automated system was estimated to maintain optimal chili plant moisture.

Taxon
chili plantse1
Treatment
the systeme0
Outcome
moisture levele0
Direction
maintaine0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“It is estimated that the plant with the system can maintain the optimal moisture level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1273 · show in text ↑
e1

“two chili plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1086 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moisture continued to decrease in the manually watered chili plant.

Taxon
chili plantse1
Outcome
moisture measuremente0
Direction
decreasee0

Verbatim

e0

“the other plant’s moisture measurement continues to decrease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1343 · show in text ↑
e1

“two chili plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1086 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Automatic watering accelerated chili plant growth versus manual watering.

Taxon
chili plantse1
Treatment
automatic wateringe0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
acceleratede0
Comparator
manual wateringe0

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to manual watering, automatic watering also results in accelerated plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1345–1433 · show in text ↑
e1

“two chili plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1086 · show in text ↑

irrigation · growth · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.