Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Growth parameters of capsicum were maximum with drip irrigation at 1.0 Epan compared with drip at 0.8 Epan.

A claim from Agro-economic potential of capsicum with drip irrigation and mulching · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth parameters of capsicum were maximum with drip irrigation at 1.0 Epan compared with drip at 0.8 Epan.

Taxon
capsicumCapsicumt0
Treatment
drip irrigation at 1.0 Epane1
Outcome
growth parameterse1
Direction
maximume1
Comparator
drip irrigation at 0.8 Epane1
Setting
Raipur, Chhattisgarh, Indiae2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum
Capsicum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The growth parameters like plant height, number of primary and secondary branches, stem girth, leaf area, leaf area index, dry weight of leaf, stem, fruit and total dry weight were maximum with drip irrigation at 1.0 Epan followed by drip irrigation at 0.8 Epan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–1013
e2

“A field experiment was conducted during 2006-07 and 2007-08 at Precision Farming Development Centre, Indira Gandhi Agricultural University, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–167
t0

“Agro-economic potential of capsicum with drip irrigation and mulching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–69

Title

Agro-economic potential of capsicum with drip irrigation and mulching

VK Choudhary; MC Bhambri SAARC Journal of Agriculture 2014. doi:10.3329/sja.v10i2.18323

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-7d6d0aa9d5da8a0420ece07778585433d157e141c7bd38f32bfda0dcb9356d20 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

irrigation · growth · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.