Abstract
A pot experiment was conducted in the greenhouse of the National Research Centre at Dokki, Cairo, Egypt. This work designed to investigate the effect of nano-fertilizer and potassium citrate on yield and mineral status of wheat plants Gemmaza 12. The main Data were: Spike length and weight, No of spikes/plant and 1000 grain weight (seed index) decreased with the increase in salt stress. Also spike and weight/plants showed approximately the same response. total weight, plant height and yield and yields traits i.e No of spikes , weight, grain weight/spike, seed index (1000 grain weight), spike weight /plant and grains weight /plant increased by both potassium citrate and nano-fertilizers in comparable with the control plants. While grains of spike increased by potassium citrate more than nano-fertilizer but the differences in spikes length did not reach the level of significant. Under fresh water treatment, yield and traits except spike length increased by both chemical treatments but the increment with nano-fertilizer more than that with potassium citrate but on reverse length of spike decreased by both foliar treatments. The increment in grain of spike with potassium citrate was more than that of nano-fertilizers. In the case of grains/plant the increment seemed to be equal. Both sprayed materials improved yield and most of yield attributes under salinity. N and Mg % increased by salinity but K, Mn and Zn % decreased with the increase in salt concentration in water of irrigation. However, Fe percentage decreased only with the 1st level of salinity, and that N and Mg % increased by salinity but K, Mn and Zn % decreased with the increase in salt concentration in water of irrigation. The interaction effects of either nano or potassium citrate fertilizer and salt stress on grains were significant
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
Greater salinity reduced spike length, weight, spike number, and seed index.
- Taxon
- WHEAT PLANTS
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- increase in salt stresse0
- Outcome
- Spike length and weight, No of spikes/plant and 1000 grain weight (seed index)e0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Spike length and weight, No of spikes/plant and 1000 grain weight (seed index) decreased with the increase in salt stress”
t0“WHEAT PLANTS”
Claim · model-written summary
Potassium citrate increased yield and multiple yield traits versus control.
- Taxon
- WHEAT PLANTSTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- potassium citratee0
- Outcome
- total weight, plant height and yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- control plantse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“total weight, plant height and yield and yields traits i.e No of spikes , weight, grain weight/spike, seed index (1000 grain weight), spike weight /plant and grains weight /plant increased by both potassium citrate and nano-fertilizers in comparable with the control plants”
t0“WHEAT PLANTS”
Claim · model-written summary
Nano-fertilizers increased yield and multiple yield traits versus control.
- Taxon
- WHEAT PLANTSTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- nano-fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- yield and yields traitse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- control plantse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“total weight, plant height and yield and yields traits i.e No of spikes , weight, grain weight/spike, seed index (1000 grain weight), spike weight /plant and grains weight /plant increased by both potassium citrate and nano-fertilizers in comparable with the control plants”
t0“WHEAT PLANTS”
Claim · model-written summary
Potassium citrate increased grains per spike more than nano-fertilizer.
- Taxon
- WHEAT PLANTSTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- potassium citratee0
- Outcome
- grains of spikee0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- nano-fertilizere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“grains of spike increased by potassium citrate more than nano-fertilizer”
t0“WHEAT PLANTS”
Claim · model-written summary
Differences in spike length did not reach significance.
- Taxon
- WHEAT PLANTSTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- spikes lengthe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“differences in spikes length did not reach the level of significant”
t0“WHEAT PLANTS”
Claim · model-written summary
With fresh water, both treatments increased yield and traits other than spike length.
- Taxon
- WHEAT PLANTSTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- both chemical treatmentse0
- Outcome
- yield and traits except spike lengthe0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- Under fresh water treatmente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Under fresh water treatment, yield and traits except spike length increased by both chemical treatments”
t0“WHEAT PLANTS”
Claim · model-written summary
Under fresh water, nano-fertilizer increased yield traits more than potassium citrate.
- Taxon
- WHEAT PLANTSTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- nano-fertilizere0
- Outcome
- incremente0
- Direction
- more thane0
- Comparator
- potassium citratee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the increment with nano-fertilizer more than that with potassium citrate”
t0“WHEAT PLANTS”
Claim · model-written summary
Both foliar treatments reduced spike length under fresh water.
- Taxon
- WHEAT PLANTSTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- both foliar treatmentse0
- Outcome
- length of spikee0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“length of spike decreased by both foliar treatments”
t0“WHEAT PLANTS”
Claim · model-written summary
Potassium citrate produced a greater grain-per-spike increment than nano-fertilizers.
- Taxon
- WHEAT PLANTSTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- potassium citratee0
- Outcome
- increment in grain of spikee0
- Direction
- more thane0
- Comparator
- nano-fertilizerse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The increment in grain of spike with potassium citrate was more than that of nano-fertilizers”
t0“WHEAT PLANTS”
Claim · model-written summary
The two fertilizers produced similar grains-per-plant increments.
- Taxon
- WHEAT PLANTSTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- grains/plante0
- Direction
- equale0
Not reportedTreatmentComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In the case of grains/plant the increment seemed to be equal”
t0“WHEAT PLANTS”
Claim · model-written summary
Greater irrigation-water salt concentration decreased K, Mn, and Zn percentages.
- Taxon
- WHEAT PLANTSTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- increase in salt concentration in water of irrigatione0
- Outcome
- K, Mn and Zn %e0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“However, Fe percentage decreased only with the 1st level of salinity, and that N and Mg % increased by salinity but K, Mn and Zn % decreased with the increase in salt concentration in water of irrigation.”
t0“WHEAT PLANTS”
Claim · model-written summary
Fe percentage decreased only at the first salinity level.
- Taxon
- WHEAT PLANTSTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 1st level of salinitye0
- Outcome
- Fe percentagee0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Fe percentage decreased only with the 1st level of salinity”
t0“WHEAT PLANTS”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizer by salinity interaction effects on grains were significant.
- Taxon
- WHEAT PLANTSTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- either nano or potassium citrate fertilizer and salt stresse0
- Outcome
- grainse0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The interaction effects of either nano or potassium citrate fertilizer and salt stress on grains were significant”
t0“WHEAT PLANTS”
The same questions in other papers
salinity · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
81 papers more in this group
See all 85 papers →irrigation · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 74 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
99 papers more in this group
See all 103 papers →salinity · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
196 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
223 papers more in this group
See all 227 papers →nanoparticle · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
241 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
256 papers more in this group
See all 260 papers →application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
81 papers in the same direction as this paper · 795 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
873 papers more in this group
See all 877 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.