Paper · 2022 · Journal of Agricultural Science

Performance and Fruit Ripening of Red Orange Tree Grafted onto Two Rootstocks

Rafaelly C. Martins; Sarita Leonel; Jackson M. A. Souza; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
2
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The cultivar Sanguínea de Mombuca (Citrus sinensis [L.] Osbeck) bears lycopene-rich fruits with attractive red pulp and high nutritional value; thus, this cultivar has the potential to diversify orchards for the production of fruits for natural consumption and juice. Therefore, studies on the productive performance in combination with rootstocks are required. This study evaluated the phenological cycles, yield, ripening curve, and fruit quality of this cultivar grafted onto ‘Rangpur’ lime and ‘Swingle’ citrumelo. The study was conducted in the Midwest of the state of São Paulo, in the subtropical region of southeastern Brazil, and the field experiment was performed over two consecutive seasons. Rootstocks had little effect on the duration of the phenological cycles. The fruit ripening curve predicted the time of harvest as approximately 240 days after anthesis, regardless of rootstock. Fruits harvested from trees grafted onto ‘Swingle’ citrumelo showed higher levels of soluble solids and sugars and higher technological indices. The larger number of fruits and greater fresh weight confirmed that better yield performance occurred with the trees grafted onto the ‘Rangpur’ lime as opposed to the ‘Swingle’ citrumelo rootstock.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rootstocks had little effect on the duration of the phenological cycles of Citrus sinensis cv. Sanguínea de Mombuca.

Taxon
Citrus sinensisCitrus sinensise0
Material
Sanguínea de Mombucae0
Treatment
Rootstockse1
Outcome
duration of the phenological cyclese1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cultivar Sanguínea de Mombuca (Citrus sinensis [L.] Osbeck)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–63 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rootstocks had little effect on the duration of the phenological cycles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–775 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit harvest was predicted at approximately 240 days after anthesis, regardless of rootstock.

Taxon
Citrus sinensisCitrus sinensise0
Outcome
time of harveste2
Value
approximately 240 days after anthesise2
Qualifier
regardless of rootstocke2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cultivar Sanguínea de Mombuca (Citrus sinensis [L.] Osbeck)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–63 · show in text ↑
e2

“The fruit ripening curve predicted the time of harvest as approximately 240 days after anthesis, regardless of rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–897 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruits from trees grafted onto Swingle citrumelo had higher soluble solids and sugars.

Taxon
Citrus sinensisCitrus sinensise0
Material
Sanguínea de Mombucae0
Treatment
grafted onto ‘Swingle’ citrumeloe1
Outcome
soluble solids and sugarse1
Direction
highere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cultivar Sanguínea de Mombuca (Citrus sinensis [L.] Osbeck)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–63 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fruits harvested from trees grafted onto ‘Swingle’ citrumelo showed higher levels of soluble solids and sugars and higher technological indices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1042 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruits from trees grafted onto Swingle citrumelo had higher technological indices.

Taxon
Citrus sinensisCitrus sinensise0
Material
Sanguínea de Mombucae0
Treatment
grafted onto ‘Swingle’ citrumeloe1
Outcome
technological indicese1
Direction
highere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cultivar Sanguínea de Mombuca (Citrus sinensis [L.] Osbeck)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–63 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fruits harvested from trees grafted onto ‘Swingle’ citrumelo showed higher levels of soluble solids and sugars and higher technological indices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1042 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trees grafted onto Rangpur lime gave better yield performance than trees grafted onto Swingle citrumelo.

Taxon
Citrus sinensisCitrus sinensise0
Treatment
grafted onto the ‘Rangpur’ limee1
Outcome
yield performancee1
Direction
bettere1
Comparator
‘Swingle’ citrumelo rootstocke1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cultivar Sanguínea de Mombuca (Citrus sinensis [L.] Osbeck)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–63 · show in text ↑
e1

“The larger number of fruits and greater fresh weight confirmed that better yield performance occurred with the trees grafted onto the ‘Rangpur’ lime as opposed to the ‘Swingle’ citrumelo rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1240 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trees grafted onto Rangpur lime had a larger number of fruits than trees grafted onto Swingle citrumelo.

Taxon
Citrus sinensisCitrus sinensise0
Treatment
grafted onto the ‘Rangpur’ limee1
Outcome
number of fruitse1
Direction
largere1
Comparator
‘Swingle’ citrumelo rootstocke1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cultivar Sanguínea de Mombuca (Citrus sinensis [L.] Osbeck)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–63 · show in text ↑
e1

“The larger number of fruits and greater fresh weight confirmed that better yield performance occurred with the trees grafted onto the ‘Rangpur’ lime as opposed to the ‘Swingle’ citrumelo rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1240 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trees grafted onto Rangpur lime had greater fresh fruit weight than trees grafted onto Swingle citrumelo.

Taxon
Citrus sinensisCitrus sinensise0
Treatment
grafted onto the ‘Rangpur’ limee1
Outcome
fresh weighte1
Direction
greatere1
Comparator
‘Swingle’ citrumelo rootstocke1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cultivar Sanguínea de Mombuca (Citrus sinensis [L.] Osbeck)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–63 · show in text ↑
e1

“The larger number of fruits and greater fresh weight confirmed that better yield performance occurred with the trees grafted onto the ‘Rangpur’ lime as opposed to the ‘Swingle’ citrumelo rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1240 · show in text ↑

grafting · quality: phytochemicals · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

grafting · growth · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

grafting · yield · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 17 positive, 7 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

lime · growth · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

lime · yield · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.