Paper · 2022 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Isolation and Identification of Pathogens Responsible for Post-Harvest Spoilage of Onions (Allium Cepa L.) in Some Selected Markets in Maiduguri, Borno State

Malilima, Mohammed Zanna; Peter, Stephen

16
claims
29
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

This study aims to identify and isolate pathogens, responsible for post-harvest spoilage of onions (Allium cepa L.) with the following stated objectives: To isolate and Identify pathogens responsible for the onion spoilages, to estimate diseased incidence on spoiled onion, to characterizes effect of leaf extract on the pathogens, to determine whether environmental factor has effect on onion post-harvest handling process by farmers. The data was analyzed using simple percentage. physical characteristic and microscopic characteristics of the isolated pathogens; The survey reviles the diseased incidence on spoiled onion isolated from the sampled onions. Five samples sample were collected from three different markets selected for this study. 13.3 percent of the rotten onion are caused by Penicillium digitatum, Fusarium oxysporum, and Rhizopus stolonifera. which are mainly fungal pathogens and 26.6 percent is caused by Aspergills niger which is also fungi while 26.6 percent Saccaromyces cerevisiae which is bacterial isolate. The distribution of the bacteria in relation to the markets surveyed. The percentage distribution was 64.28% Enterobacter sp, 21.42% Pseudomonas Sp and 14.28% Escherichia coli, respectively. Leaf extract test result of four different disk against standard anti-biotic gentamycin sample. The neem extract shows total 56 mm inhibition area with averagely 28% against the standard sample gentamycin. Bitter leaf extract also shows 54 total inhibition zone with total 27% while African mahogany with highest inhibition zone shows total 62mm inhibition zone with average of 31%. And Aloe vera shows 60mm total inhibition zone with average of 30%. The research also shows that room temperature (29- 300) was the best temperature for development of rot. There was no rot formation at -200C and at 40c while at 370C very little rot developed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Penicillium digitatum was linked to 13.3 percent of rotten onions.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Interactor
Penicillium digitatumPenicillium digitatume0pathogen
Outcome
rotten onione0
Value
13.3 percente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Penicillium digitatum
Penicillium digitatum · InteractorKeith Seifert · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“13.3 percent of the rotten onion are caused by Penicillium digitatum, Fusarium oxysporum, and Rhizopus stolonifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–862 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusarium oxysporum was linked to 13.3 percent of rotten onions.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Interactor
Fusarium oxysporumFusarium oxysporume0pathogen
Outcome
rotten onione0
Value
13.3 percente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“13.3 percent of the rotten onion are caused by Penicillium digitatum, Fusarium oxysporum, and Rhizopus stolonifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–862 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizopus stolonifera was linked to 13.3 percent of rotten onions.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Interactor
Rhizopus stoloniferae0pathogen
Outcome
rotten onione0
Value
13.3 percente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“13.3 percent of the rotten onion are caused by Penicillium digitatum, Fusarium oxysporum, and Rhizopus stolonifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–862 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aspergills niger was linked to 26.6 percent of rotten onions.

Taxon
onions (Allium cepa L.)Allium cepat0
Interactor
Aspergills nigere0pathogen
Outcome
caused by Aspergills nigere0
Value
26.6 percente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“26.6 percent is caused by Aspergills niger”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–944 · show in text ↑
t0

“onions (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 83–106 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The text attributes 26.6 percent to Saccaromyces cerevisiae.

Taxon
onions (Allium cepa L.)Allium cepat0
Interactor
Saccaromyces cerevisiaee0pathogen
Outcome
Saccaromyces cerevisiaee0
Value
26.6 percente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“26.6 percent Saccaromyces cerevisiae which is bacterial isolate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1034 · show in text ↑
t0

“onions (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 83–106 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enterobacter sp accounted for 64.28% of bacterial isolates.

Taxon
onions (Allium cepa L.)Allium cepat0
Interactor
Enterobacter spEnterobactere0pathogen
Outcome
Enterobacter spe0
Value
64.28%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Enterobacter
Enterobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“64.28% Enterobacter sp, 21.42% Pseudomonas Sp and 14.28% Escherichia coli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1211 · show in text ↑
t0

“onions (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 83–106 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas Sp accounted for 21.42% of bacterial isolates.

Taxon
onions (Allium cepa L.)Allium cepat0
Interactor
Pseudomonas Spe0pathogen
Outcome
Pseudomonas Spe0
Value
21.42%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“64.28% Enterobacter sp, 21.42% Pseudomonas Sp and 14.28% Escherichia coli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1211 · show in text ↑
t0

“onions (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 83–106 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Escherichia coli accounted for 14.28% of bacterial isolates.

Taxon
onions (Allium cepa L.)Allium cepat0
Interactor
Escherichia coliEscherichia colie0pathogen
Outcome
Escherichia colie0
Value
14.28%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Escherichia coli
Escherichia coli · InteractorNIAID · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“64.28% Enterobacter sp, 21.42% Pseudomonas Sp and 14.28% Escherichia coli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1211 · show in text ↑
t0

“onions (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 83–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem extract produced 56 mm inhibition area.

Taxon
onions (Allium cepa L.)Allium cepat0
Treatment
neem extracte0
Outcome
inhibition areae0
Value
56 mme0
Qualifier
28%e0
Comparator
gentamycine0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The neem extract shows total 56 mm inhibition area with averagely 28% against the standard sample gentamycin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1323–1431 · show in text ↑
t0

“onions (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 83–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bitter leaf extract produced 54 total inhibition zone.

Taxon
onions (Allium cepa L.)Allium cepat0
Treatment
Bitter leaf extracte0
Outcome
inhibition zonee0
Value
54 total inhibition zonee0
Qualifier
27%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bitter leaf extract also shows 54 total inhibition zone with total 27%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1433–1503 · show in text ↑
t0

“onions (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 83–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

African mahogany extract gave the highest inhibition zone, 62mm.

Taxon
onions (Allium cepa L.)Allium cepat0
Treatment
African mahoganye0
Outcome
inhibition zonee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
62mme0
Qualifier
31%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“African mahogany with highest inhibition zone shows total 62mm inhibition zone with average of 31%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1510–1608 · show in text ↑
t0

“onions (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 83–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aloe vera extract gave a 60mm inhibition zone.

Taxon
onions (Allium cepa L.)Allium cepat0
Treatment
Aloe verae0
Outcome
inhibition zonee0
Value
60mme0
Qualifier
30%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Aloe vera shows 60mm total inhibition zone with average of 30%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1614–1676 · show in text ↑
t0

“onions (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 83–106 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The reported room temperature was best for rot development.

Taxon
onions (Allium cepa L.)Allium cepat0
Outcome
development of rote0
Direction
beste0
Value
29- 300e0
Setting
room temperaturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“room temperature (29- 300) was the best temperature for development of rot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1707–1781 · show in text ↑
t0

“onions (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 83–106 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No rot formed at the reported low temperature.

Taxon
onions (Allium cepa L.)Allium cepat0
Outcome
no rot formatione0
Value
-200Ce0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no rot formation at -200C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1783–1818 · show in text ↑
t0

“onions (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 83–106 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No rot formed at 40c.

Taxon
onions (Allium cepa L.)Allium cepat0
Outcome
at 40ce0
Value
40ce0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at 40c while at 370C very little rot developed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1823–1869 · show in text ↑
t0

“onions (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 83–106 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Very little rot developed at 370C.

Taxon
onions (Allium cepa L.)Allium cepat0
Outcome
very little rot developede0
Direction
very littlee0
Value
370Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at 370C very little rot developed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1836–1869 · show in text ↑
t0

“onions (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 83–106 · show in text ↑

Azadirachta indica · disease · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

botanical · disease · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 21 positive, 8 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.