Paper · 2022 · Acta Horticulturae

Deficit irrigation and reflective mulch effects on peach quality and storage performance

E.D. Pliakoni; G.D. Nanos

17
claims
34
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effect of deficit irrigation and reflective mulch underneath the tree canopy on quality at harvest and during cold storage of ‘Royal Glory’ peaches (Prunus persica L.) was studied for two consecutive growing seasons. Four treatments were applied: 1) control, irrigation at 100% of crop evapotranspiration (ETc); 2) deficit irrigation (DI), irrigation at 75% of ETc in the last 3 weeks before harvest and 50% of ETc postharvest; 3) reflective mulch Extenday™ underneath the tree canopy; 4) the combined treatment of reflective mulch and deficit irrigation. Quality was assessed in fruit from the upper (sun-exposed) and lower (shaded) tree canopy at harvest and after 2, 4, and 6 weeks at 2°C plus 1 day of shelf life at 20°C. The quality parameters measured were fruit mass, skin color, flesh firmness and specific conductivity, juice acidity and soluble solids content (SSC), percent dry matter (DM) and total phenolic content in the edible part. Incidence and severity of chilling injury (CI) symptoms were also evaluated. Furthermore, tree fruit productivity and solar radiation (UV and PAR) above and underneath the tree canopy were measured. During cold storage, skin color changed slightly, fruit softened and the specific conductivity, SSC, acidity and percent dry matter decreased, while total phenolic content and CI symptoms increased. Reflective mulch application improved light availability and fruit quality, especially in the lower tree canopy. Peaches grown under DI had similar fruit quality and CI symptoms as control fruit, but decreased yield and fruit size. Peaches from the reflective mulch treatment were more mature at harvest than the fruit from other treatments, and reported better quality (especially the lower canopy fruit), and similar storage performance compared to control fruit. The fruit from the combined treatment behaved like the separate DI or reflective mulch treatments. © 2022 International Society for Horticultural Science. All rights reserved.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

During cold storage, peach skin color changed slightly.

Outcome
skin colore0
Direction
changed slightlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“peach quality and storage performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“During cold storage, skin color changed slightly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1199 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peach fruit softened during cold storage.

Outcome
fruite0
Direction
softenede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“peach quality and storage performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“During cold storage, skin color changed slightly, fruit softened”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1215 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peach specific conductivity decreased during cold storage.

Outcome
specific conductivitye0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“peach quality and storage performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“the specific conductivity, SSC, acidity and percent dry matter decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1292 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peach SSC decreased during cold storage.

Outcome
SSCe0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“peach quality and storage performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“the specific conductivity, SSC, acidity and percent dry matter decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1292 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peach acidity decreased during cold storage.

Outcome
aciditye0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“peach quality and storage performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“the specific conductivity, SSC, acidity and percent dry matter decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1292 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peach percent dry matter decreased during cold storage.

Outcome
percent dry mattere0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“peach quality and storage performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“the specific conductivity, SSC, acidity and percent dry matter decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1292 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peach total phenolic content increased during cold storage.

Outcome
total phenolic contente0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“peach quality and storage performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“total phenolic content and CI symptoms increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1348 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peach CI symptoms increased during cold storage.

Outcome
CI symptomse0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“peach quality and storage performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“total phenolic content and CI symptoms increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1348 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reflective mulch improved light availability under the peach canopy.

Treatment
Reflective mulch applicatione0
Outcome
light availabilitye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“peach quality and storage performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“Reflective mulch application improved light availability and fruit quality, especially in the lower tree canopy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1350–1461 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reflective mulch improved peach fruit quality, particularly in the lower canopy.

Treatment
Reflective mulch applicatione0
Outcome
fruit qualitye0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
especially in the lower tree canopye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“peach quality and storage performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“Reflective mulch application improved light availability and fruit quality, especially in the lower tree canopy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1350–1461 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit-irrigated peaches had similar fruit quality and chilling-injury symptoms to controls.

Treatment
DIe0
Outcome
fruit quality and CI symptomse0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
control fruite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“peach quality and storage performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“Peaches grown under DI had similar fruit quality and CI symptoms as control fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1463–1544 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation decreased peach yield relative to controls.

Treatment
DIe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
control fruite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“peach quality and storage performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“Peaches grown under DI had similar fruit quality and CI symptoms as control fruit, but decreased yield and fruit size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1463–1580 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation decreased peach fruit size relative to controls.

Treatment
DIe0
Outcome
fruit sizee0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
control fruite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“peach quality and storage performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“Peaches grown under DI had similar fruit quality and CI symptoms as control fruit, but decreased yield and fruit size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1463–1580 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peaches under reflective mulch were more mature at harvest than fruit under other treatments.

Treatment
reflective mulch treatmente0
Outcome
more mature at harveste0
Direction
more maturee0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“peach quality and storage performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“Peaches from the reflective mulch treatment were more mature at harvest than the fruit from other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1582–1690 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reflective-mulch peaches had better quality than other treatments, especially in the lower canopy.

Treatment
reflective mulch treatmente0
Outcome
better qualitye0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“peach quality and storage performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“Peaches from the reflective mulch treatment were more mature at harvest than the fruit from other treatments, and reported better quality (especially the lower canopy fruit)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1582–1755 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reflective mulch produced similar peach storage performance to control fruit.

Outcome
storage performancee0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
control fruite0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“peach quality and storage performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“similar storage performance compared to control fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1761–1814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined deficit irrigation and reflective mulch produced fruit responses like the separate treatments.

Treatment
combined treatmente0
Outcome
behaved likee0
Direction
behaved likee0
Comparator
separate DI or reflective mulch treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“peach quality and storage performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“The fruit from the combined treatment behaved like the separate DI or reflective mulch treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1816–1913 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

55 papers: 31 positive, 24 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

mulching · quality: grain · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

irrigation · crop injury · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

mulching · yield · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 19 positive, 1 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

mulching · quality: general · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.