Paper · 2007 · Assiut Journal of Agricultural Sciences/Assuit Journal of Agricultural Sciences

BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF THE HONEYDEW MOTH, CRYPTOBLABES GNIDIELLA MILL. IN GRAPE ORCHARDS USING THE LOCAL EGG PARASITOID,TRICHOGRAMMA EVANESCENS WEST. AND AGERIN ( BACILLUS THURINGIENSIS) AS COMPARED WITH RECOMMENDED INSECTICIDES IN MIDDLE EGYPT.

T.H Tohamy,; A. A. Abd El- Raheem; M. I.El Khouly

10
claims
12
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The role of inunudation by the egg parasitoid , Trichogramma evanescens West alone and combined with Agerin (Bacillus thuringiensis ) compared with recommended insecticides(Relidan and Somithion ) was evaluated against the honeydew moth (HDM) Cryptoblabes gnidiella Mill. infesting grape orchards in Mina region during two successive seasons of (2006 and 2007) .The results obtained showed that the highest general percentage of parasitism on HDM eggs was observed in grape orchard treated with egg parasitoid and Agerin (B.t.) together followed with those treated with only egg parasitoid, while it was nil in those treated with insecticides and untreated areas (control). Also spraying insecticides in grape orchard significant reduced the number of predators compared with the other two treatments. Furthermore , the release of the egg parasitoid plus spraying Agerin (B.t.) in grape orchards demonstrate the highest general mean percent reduction in infestation by C. gnidiella (67.65 and 68.99 %) followed with 63.39 and 44.56 % reduction in grape orchards treated with insecticides and 59.35 and 44.78 % reduction in those treated with the egg parasitoid alone compared to the untreated orchard in both years seasons, respectively. The statistical analysis showed significant difference between the effectiveness of the three tested control methods in reducing damage by this pest. Also, the costs of honeydew moth control compared with chemical treatments were reduced by 41.1% and 62.5 % in grape trees treated with egg- parasitoid combined with Agerin (B.t.) and only egg parasitoid , respectively. On the other hand, the percentage of increasing in grape fruit yield/tree was significantly higher in the grape orchards treated with egg parasitoid plus Agerin than (27.43 and 29.09 %) in those treated with egg parasitoid alone (21.90 and 22.77 %) and insecticides (25.45 and 24.27%) compared to the control ones in both seasons, respectively. These results seems to be of great significance when planning for control program against this pest.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Parasitoid plus Agerin gave the highest honeydew moth egg parasitism, followed by parasitoid alone; insecticide and control orchards had none.

Taxon
grapee0
Treatment
egg parasitoid and Agerin (B.t.) togethere0
Interactor
HDMe0pest
Outcome
parasitism on HDM eggse0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
untreated areas (control)e0

Verbatim

e0

“highest general percentage of parasitism on HDM eggs was observed in grape orchard treated with egg parasitoid and Agerin (B.t.) together followed with those treated with only egg parasitoid, while it was nil in those treated with insecticides and untreated areas (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–672 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Insecticide spraying significantly reduced predator numbers compared with biological treatments.

Taxon
grapee0
Treatment
spraying insecticidese0
Outcome
number of predatorse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
the other two treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“spraying insecticides in grape orchard significant reduced the number of predators compared with the other two treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–800 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Parasitoid plus Agerin reduced moth infestation by 67.65 and 68.99% in the two seasons.

Taxon
grapee0
Treatment
release of the egg parasitoid plus spraying Agerin (B.t.)e0
Interactor
C. gnidiellaCryptoblabes gnidiellae0pest
Outcome
infestation by C. gnidiellae0
Direction
reductione0
Value
67.65 and 68.99 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“release of the egg parasitoid plus spraying Agerin (B.t.) in grape orchards demonstrate the highest general mean percent reduction in infestation by C. gnidiella (67.65 and 68.99 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–1001 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Insecticides reduced moth infestation by 63.39 and 44.56% in the two seasons.

Taxon
grapee0
Treatment
insecticidese0
Outcome
reductione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
63.39 and 44.56 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“63.39 and 44.56 % reduction in grape orchards treated with insecticides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1087 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Parasitoid alone reduced moth infestation by 59.35 and 44.78% in the two seasons.

Treatment
egg parasitoid alonee0
Outcome
reductione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
59.35 and 44.78 %e0
Comparator
untreated orcharde0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“59.35 and 44.78 % reduction in those treated with the egg parasitoid alone compared to the untreated orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1200 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined parasitoid and Agerin control lowered costs by 41.1% relative to chemical treatments.

Taxon
grapee0
Treatment
egg- parasitoid combined with Agerin (B.t.)e0
Outcome
costs of honeydew moth controle0
Direction
reducede0
Value
41.1%e0
Comparator
chemical treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“costs of honeydew moth control compared with chemical treatments were reduced by 41.1% and 62.5 % in grape trees treated with egg- parasitoid combined with Agerin (B.t.) and only egg parasitoid , respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1398–1606 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Parasitoid alone lowered control costs by 62.5% relative to chemical treatments.

Taxon
grapee0
Treatment
only egg parasitoide0
Outcome
costs of honeydew moth controle0
Direction
reducede0
Value
62.5 %e0
Comparator
chemical treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“costs of honeydew moth control compared with chemical treatments were reduced by 41.1% and 62.5 % in grape trees treated with egg- parasitoid combined with Agerin (B.t.) and only egg parasitoid , respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1398–1606 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Parasitoid plus Agerin increased grape yield per tree by 27.43 and 29.09% in the two seasons, more than comparison treatments.

Taxon
grapee0
Treatment
egg parasitoid plus Agerine0
Outcome
grape fruit yield/treee0
Direction
highere0
Value
27.43 and 29.09 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“percentage of increasing in grape fruit yield/tree was significantly higher in the grape orchards treated with egg parasitoid plus Agerin than (27.43 and 29.09 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1631–1793 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Parasitoid alone increased grape fruit yield per tree by 21.90 and 22.77% in the two seasons.

Taxon
grapee1
Treatment
egg parasitoid alonee0
Outcome
grape fruit yield/treee1
Direction
increasinge1
Value
21.90 and 22.77 %e0
Comparator
control onese0

Verbatim

e0

“those treated with egg parasitoid alone (21.90 and 22.77 %) and insecticides (25.45 and 24.27%) compared to the control ones in both seasons, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1797–1951 · show in text ↑
e1

“increasing in grape fruit yield/tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1645–1681 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Insecticides increased grape fruit yield per tree by 25.45 and 24.27% in the two seasons.

Taxon
grapee1
Treatment
insecticidese0
Outcome
grape fruit yield/treee1
Direction
increasinge1
Value
25.45 and 24.27%e0
Comparator
control onese0

Verbatim

e0

“those treated with egg parasitoid alone (21.90 and 22.77 %) and insecticides (25.45 and 24.27%) compared to the control ones in both seasons, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1797–1951 · show in text ↑
e1

“increasing in grape fruit yield/tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1645–1681 · show in text ↑

biocontrol · pest · VitisPositive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

insecticide · ecology: diversity · VitisResults agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

insecticide · yield · VitisResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

biocontrol · yield · VitisResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

biocontrol · control · VitisResults agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.