Paper · 2006 · Indian Journal of Forestry

Potential role of Ardu (Ailanthus excelsa) in agroforestry systems for sustainable rainfed agriculture in Gujarat

S. Jaimini; N. Patel; J. Patel; et al.

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Studies conducted on Ardu (Ailanthus excelsa) based agrisilvi system of Agroforestry during 1999-00 to 2001-02 have indicated beneficial effect of Ardu on environment and soil health. The raising of arable leguminous crops, viz. Cowpea, Clusterbean and Greengram as sole and as intercrops in between tree (528 trees/ha) rows indicated reduction in production under agrisilvi system as compared to sole, though, there was an improvement in soil fertility status under Ardu based Agroforestry system. The reduction in production due to competition between arable crops and woody component, i.e., Ardu is compensated by tree products and timber at completion of rotation cycle, besides improving soil fertility.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Ardu-based agrisilvi system had beneficial effects on environment and soil health.

Taxon
Ailanthus excelsaAilanthus excelsuse6
Outcome
environment and soil healthe0
Qualifier
beneficial effecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ailanthus excelsus
Ailanthus excelsus · TaxonForestowlet · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“have indicated beneficial effect of Ardu on environment and soil health”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–182 · show in text ↑
e6

“Ardu (Ailanthus excelsa) based agrisilvi system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 21–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping arable legumes between Ardu tree rows reduced production compared with sole cropping.

Treatment
intercrops in between tree (528 trees/ha) rowse1
Outcome
productione1
Direction
reductione1
Comparator
solee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The raising of arable leguminous crops, viz. Cowpea, Clusterbean and Greengram as sole and as intercrops in between tree (528 trees/ha) rows indicated reduction in production under agrisilvi system as compared to sole”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–401 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Ardu-based agroforestry system improved soil fertility status.

Taxon
Ailanthus excelsaAilanthus excelsuse6
Treatment
Ardu based Agroforestry systeme2
Outcome
soil fertility statuse2
Direction
improvemente2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ailanthus excelsus
Ailanthus excelsus · TaxonForestowlet · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“there was an improvement in soil fertility status under Ardu based Agroforestry system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–497 · show in text ↑
e6

“Ardu (Ailanthus excelsa) based agrisilvi system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 21–68 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The reduction in crop production in the agrisilvi system is due to competition between arable crops and the woody component.

Taxon
Ailanthus excelsaAilanthus excelsuse6
Outcome
reduction in productione3
Qualifier
competition between arable crops and woody componente3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ailanthus excelsus
Ailanthus excelsus · TaxonForestowlet · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The reduction in production due to competition between arable crops and woody component, i.e., Ardu is compensated by tree products and timber at completion of rotation cycle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–673 · show in text ↑
e6

“Ardu (Ailanthus excelsa) based agrisilvi system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 21–68 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The production reduction is compensated by tree products and timber at completion of the rotation cycle.

Taxon
Ailanthus excelsaAilanthus excelsuse6
Outcome
compensated by tree products and timbere3
Qualifier
at completion of rotation cyclee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ailanthus excelsus
Ailanthus excelsus · TaxonForestowlet · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The reduction in production due to competition between arable crops and woody component, i.e., Ardu is compensated by tree products and timber at completion of rotation cycle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–673 · show in text ↑
e6

“Ardu (Ailanthus excelsa) based agrisilvi system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 21–68 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

103 papers: 63 positive, 40 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 63 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

intercropping · yield · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

intercropping · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 28 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

intercropping · soil: chemistry · Ailanthus excelsusResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.