Paper · 2022 · Applied Ecology and Environmental Research

GROWTH OF COTTON CROP (GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM L.) HIGHER UNDER DRIP IRRIGATION BECAUSE OF BETTER PHOSPHORUS UPTAKE

W.X. MAI; X.R. XUE; A. AZEEM

9
claims
9
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The uptake of phosphorus (P) by plants is strongly dependent on the root distribution in the soil profile. The root architecture of crops changes significantly under different irrigation methods. A field experiment was conducted in 2016 and 2017 to investigate the root growth and P uptake responses to drip irrigation (DI) and flooding irrigation (FI) for cotton crop (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Plant growth, P concentration and P uptake of cotton plants were higher under DI compared to FI. Although the total root length of a cotton plant was not significantly different between DI and FI. While root system was more shallowly distributed in the soil profile under DI than FI (48.8% of the total roots length were distributed in the 0-10 cm soil layer under DI, and 31.5% under FI). Greater overlap in roots distribution and P concentration in soil was observed under DI. The P content in the 0-10 cm soil layer was significantly lower under DI than FI, because of P absorbed by cotton plants roots for above-ground biomass production. The contribution of unit root length of P uptake towards shoot was higher under DI. It was concluded that shallow roots distribution in response to DI may improve the P nutrition of cotton plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton plant growth was higher under drip than flooding irrigation.

Taxon
cotton plantsGossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
DIe0
Outcome
Plant growthe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
FIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant growth, P concentration and P uptake of cotton plants were higher under DI compared to FI.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–490 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton phosphorus concentration was higher under drip than flooding irrigation.

Taxon
cotton plantsGossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
DIe0
Outcome
P concentratione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
FIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant growth, P concentration and P uptake of cotton plants were higher under DI compared to FI.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–490 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton phosphorus uptake was higher under drip than flooding irrigation.

Taxon
cotton plantsGossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
DIe0
Outcome
P uptakee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
FIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant growth, P concentration and P uptake of cotton plants were higher under DI compared to FI.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–490 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total cotton root length did not differ significantly between irrigation methods.

Taxon
cotton plantGossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
DIe0
Outcome
total root lengthe0
Direction
not significantly differente0
Comparator
FIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the total root length of a cotton plant was not significantly different between DI and FI.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–590 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton roots were more shallowly distributed under drip irrigation, with 48.8% versus 31.5% in the 0-10 cm layer.

Taxon
root systeme0
Organ / stage
root systeme0
Treatment
DIe0
Outcome
total roots lengthe0
Direction
more shallowlye0
Value
48.8%e0
Qualifier
31.5% under FIe0
Comparator
FIe0

Verbatim

e0

“root system was more shallowly distributed in the soil profile under DI than FI (48.8% of the total roots length were distributed in the 0-10 cm soil layer under DI, and 31.5% under FI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–782 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root distribution and soil phosphorus concentration overlapped more under drip irrigation.

Treatment
DIe0
Outcome
overlap in roots distribution and P concentration in soile0
Direction
Greatere0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Greater overlap in roots distribution and P concentration in soil was observed under DI.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–872 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus content in the top soil layer was significantly lower under drip than flooding irrigation.

Treatment
DIe0
Outcome
P content in the 0-10 cm soil layere0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
FIe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The P content in the 0-10 cm soil layer was significantly lower under DI than FI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–953 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus uptake toward shoots per unit root length was higher under drip irrigation.

Treatment
DIe0
Outcome
contribution of unit root length of P uptake towards shoote0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The contribution of unit root length of P uptake towards shoot was higher under DI.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1120 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer that shallow roots under drip irrigation may improve cotton phosphorus nutrition.

Taxon
cotton plantsGossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
DIe0
Outcome
P nutritione0
Direction
improvee0
Qualifier
shallow roots distributione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shallow roots distribution in response to DI may improve the P nutrition of cotton plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1232 · show in text ↑

irrigation · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 27 positive, 5 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

irrigation · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

144 papers: 101 positive, 43 negative or no effect

100 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

140 papers more in this group

See all 144 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.