Paper · 2017 · Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches/Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches

Response of Some Egyptian Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Genotypes to Salinity Stress

Mona Attia; Amira El-Araby

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A pot experiment was carried out under greenhouse conditions to test the reaction of different wheat genotypes to salt stress. The seeds of 15 wheat genotypes were grown in pots containing sandy loam soil and later on the seedlings were subjected to 3 levels of saline irrigation water after 2 weeks of seed germination. The selected wheat cultivars included Shakha 93, Sakha 94, Misr1, Sids1, Sids12, Sids13, Giza168, Giza171, Sahel 1, Shandawil 1, Gemmiza 7, Gemmiza 9, Gemmiza 10, Gemmiza 11 and Gemmiza 12. The salinity of irrigation water was prepared by dissolving an appropriate amount of NaCl in tap water and adjusted to give 4500 and 8500 mg/l, beside the control treatment of tap water (500 mg/l). After 5 months of saline water application, the plants were harvested, whereas plant growth indices, grain and straw yields, as well as the harvest index were recorded. The results have shown that plant growth characteristics and yield potentials were significantly suppressed with increasing the salinity stress levels, but the rate of decline varied considerably among all trails. The more serious effect of the salinity exposure was manifested on grain yield, being 39.8 and 54.5% at 4500 and 8500 mg/l, respectively. Wheat genotypes, namely Gemmiza 7, Gemmiza 9 and Sids 1 were more superior in grain yield performance, even at the highest concentration level of irrigation water. Unlike, Gemmiza 11, 12; Misr 1, Sakha 94, Giza 168, 171, Shandweel 1 and Sids 12, 13 were reacted as the more salt-sensitive cultivars. The remaining genotypes were intermediate in reaction. On the evaluation and screening wheat cultivars to salt stress, the simple regression equation of the type y=a + b was considered to give a better expression for the quantitative assessment. According to our calculations, genotypes, i.e. Gemmiza 7, Gemmiza 9 and Sids1 were classified as salt tolerant cultivars and Sakha93, Sahel 1 & Gemmiza 10 as moderately salt tolerant and the remaining cultivars showed higher sensitivity to salt tolerance. It could be concluded that the more salt tolerant varieties could be used as a valuable cultivars in breeding programs under salt-stressed condition.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth characteristics and yield potential were significantly suppressed as salinity increased, with varying decline rates among genotypes.

Treatment
increasing the salinity stress levelse0
Outcome
plant growth characteristics and yield potentialse0
Direction
suppressede0
Qualifier
rate of decline varied considerablye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“plant growth characteristics and yield potentials were significantly suppressed with increasing the salinity stress levels, but the rate of decline varied considerably among all trails”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1090 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 4500 mg/l irrigation salinity, grain yield declined by 39.8%.

Treatment
4500e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
39.8e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“The more serious effect of the salinity exposure was manifested on grain yield, being 39.8 and 54.5% at 4500 and 8500 mg/l, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1228 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 8500 mg/l irrigation salinity, grain yield declined by 54.5%.

Treatment
8500 mg/le0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
54.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“The more serious effect of the salinity exposure was manifested on grain yield, being 39.8 and 54.5% at 4500 and 8500 mg/l, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1228 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gemmiza 7, Gemmiza 9 and Sids 1 had superior grain yield even at the highest salinity.

Material
Gemmiza 7, Gemmiza 9 and Sids 1e0
Outcome
grain yield performancee0
Direction
more superiore0
Qualifier
even at the highest concentration level of irrigation watere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“Gemmiza 7, Gemmiza 9 and Sids 1 were more superior in grain yield performance, even at the highest concentration level of irrigation water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1392 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gemmiza 11, 12; Misr 1, Sakha 94, Giza 168, 171, Shandweel 1 and Sids 12, 13 were more salt sensitive.

Material
Gemmiza 11, 12; Misr 1, Sakha 94, Giza 168, 171, Shandweel 1 and Sids 12, 13e0
Outcome
more salt-sensitive cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“Gemmiza 11, 12; Misr 1, Sakha 94, Giza 168, 171, Shandweel 1 and Sids 12, 13 were reacted as the more salt-sensitive cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1402–1528 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The remaining genotypes were intermediate in salt response.

Material
remaining genotypese0
Outcome
intermediate in reactione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“The remaining genotypes were intermediate in reaction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1530–1583 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The simple regression equation gave a better quantitative assessment of salt stress response.

Outcome
better expression for the quantitative assessmente0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“the simple regression equation of the type y=a + b was considered to give a better expression for the quantitative assessment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1649–1774 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gemmiza 7, Gemmiza 9 and Sids1 were classified as salt tolerant.

Material
Gemmiza 7, Gemmiza 9 and Sids1e0
Outcome
salt tolerant cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“Gemmiza 7, Gemmiza 9 and Sids1 were classified as salt tolerant cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1823–1896 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sakha93, Sahel 1 and Gemmiza 10 were classified as moderately salt tolerant.

Material
Sakha93, Sahel 1 & Gemmiza 10e0
Outcome
moderately salt tolerante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“Sakha93, Sahel 1 & Gemmiza 10 as moderately salt tolerant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1901–1958 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The remaining cultivars showed greater salt sensitivity.

Material
remaining cultivarse0
Outcome
sensitivity to salt tolerancee0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“the remaining cultivars showed higher sensitivity to salt tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1963–2030 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose using the more salt tolerant varieties in breeding under salt stress.

Material
more salt tolerant varietiese0
Outcome
used as a valuable cultivars in breeding programs under salt-stressed conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“the more salt tolerant varieties could be used as a valuable cultivars in breeding programs under salt-stressed condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2059–2180 · show in text ↑

salinity · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

227 papers: 30 positive, 197 negative or no effect

196 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

223 papers more in this group

See all 227 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.