Paper · 2018 · ˜The œjournal of cotton science/Journal of cotton science

1-Methylcyclopropene Effects on Field-Grown Cotton: Physiological Characteristics

Murilo M. Maeda; J. Tom Cothren; James L. Heilman; et al.

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) is the lead cash crop in Texas, and its productivity is often challenged by stressful environmental conditions such as high temperatures and sub-optimal water supply. The objective of this investigation was to assess the impact of 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) applications triggered by canopy temperature and forecasted ambient temperatures on field-grown cotton plants. Physiological responses to 1-MCP applications were investigated in field studies conducted during the summers of 2012-2014 at the Texas A&M University Field Laboratory in Burleson County, TX. During all three growing seasons, more than 65% of the days reached temperatures above 28 °C, which indicated great potential for high temperature stress. Daily plant canopy temperature, net photosynthesis, transpiration, and photosystem II quantum yield were affected by 1-MCP treatment when plants were irrigated, but not under dryland conditions. Positive effects of 1-MCP were found for fruit retention in 2013 and 2014, for both irrigated and dryland studies, although a negative impact was found in the 2012 irrigated study. Applications of 1-MCP affected physiological characteristics; however, it did not affect crop yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP affected canopy temperature, photosynthesis, transpiration and photosystem II quantum yield under irrigation.

Treatment
1-MCP treatmente0
Outcome
Daily plant canopy temperature, net photosynthesis, transpiration, and photosystem II quantum yielde0
Qualifier
when plants were irrigatede0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Daily plant canopy temperature, net photosynthesis, transpiration, and photosystem II quantum yield were affected by 1-MCP treatment when plants were irrigated, but not under dryland conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–943 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Those physiological responses were not detected under dryland conditions.

Treatment
1-MCP treatmente0
Outcome
Daily plant canopy temperature, net photosynthesis, transpiration, and photosystem II quantum yielde0
Direction
not under dryland conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Daily plant canopy temperature, net photosynthesis, transpiration, and photosystem II quantum yield were affected by 1-MCP treatment when plants were irrigated, but not under dryland conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–943 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP improved fruit retention in 2013 and 2014 under irrigation and dryland conditions.

Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
fruit retentione0
Direction
Positive effectse0
Qualifier
2013 and 2014, for both irrigated and dryland studiese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Positive effects of 1-MCP were found for fruit retention in 2013 and 2014, for both irrigated and dryland studies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1057 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP reduced fruit retention in the 2012 irrigated study.

Treatment
1-MCPe1
Outcome
fruit retentione1
Direction
negative impacte0
Qualifier
2012 irrigated studye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a negative impact was found in the 2012 irrigated study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1123 · show in text ↑
e1

“Positive effects of 1-MCP were found for fruit retention”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1000 · show in text ↑
e2

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP did not affect cotton yield.

Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applications of 1-MCP affected physiological characteristics; however, it did not affect crop yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1225 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–30 · show in text ↑

1-methylcyclopropene · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · physiology: photosynthesis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.