Paper · 2015 · Journal of Integrative Agriculture

Ethylene-inhibiting compound 1-MCP delays leaf senescence in cotton plants under abiotic stress conditions

Yuan CHEN; J T Cothren; De-hua CHEN; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
30
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) plants produce more ethylene when subjected to abiotic stresses, such as high temperatures and drought, which result in premature leaf senescence, reduced photosynthetic efficiency, and thus decreased yield. This study was conducted to test the hypothesis that the ethylene-inhibiting compound 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) treatment of cotton plants can delay leaf senescence under high temperature, drought, and the aging process in controlled environmental conditions. Potted cotton plants were exposed to 1-MCP treatment at the early square stage of development. The protective effect of 1-MCP against membrane damage was found on older compared to younger leaves, indicating 1-MCP could lower the stress level caused by aging. Application of 1-MCP resulted in reduction of lipid peroxidation, membrane leakage, soluble sugar content, and increased chlorophyll content, in contrast to the untreated plants under heat stress, suggesting that 1-MCP treatment of cotton plants may also have the potential to reduce the effect of heat stress in terms of delayed senescence. Application of 1-MCP caused reductions of lipid peroxidation, membrane leakage, and soluble sugar content, together with increases in water use efficiency (WUE), water potential, chlorophyll content, and fluorescence quantum efficiency, compared to the untreated plants under drought, suggesting that 1-MCP treatment of cotton plants may also have the ability to reduce the level of stress under drought conditions. In conclusion, 1-MCP treatment of cotton should have the potential to delay senescence under heat and drought stress, and the aging process. Additionally, 1-MCP is more effective under stress than under non-stress conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP protected older cotton leaves against membrane damage more than younger leaves.

Taxon
cotton plantsGossypium hirsutumt0
Organ / stage
oldere0
Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
membrane damagee0
Direction
protective effecte0
Comparator
younger leavese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The protective effect of 1-MCP against membrane damage was found on older compared to younger leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–697 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under heat stress, 1-MCP reduced lipid peroxidation, membrane leakage, and soluble sugar content versus untreated plants.

Taxon
cotton plantsGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
lipid peroxidation, membrane leakage, soluble sugar contente0
Direction
reductione0
Qualifier
under heat stresse0
Comparator
untreated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 1-MCP resulted in reduction of lipid peroxidation, membrane leakage, soluble sugar content, and increased chlorophyll content, in contrast to the untreated plants under heat stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–957 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under heat stress, 1-MCP increased chlorophyll content versus untreated plants.

Taxon
cotton plantsGossypium hirsutumt0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
under heat stresse0
Comparator
untreated plantse0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased chlorophyll content, in contrast to the untreated plants under heat stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–957 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought, 1-MCP reduced lipid peroxidation, membrane leakage, and soluble sugar content versus untreated plants.

Taxon
cotton plantsGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
lipid peroxidation, membrane leakage, and soluble sugar contente0
Direction
reductionse0
Qualifier
under droughte0
Comparator
untreated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 1-MCP caused reductions of lipid peroxidation, membrane leakage, and soluble sugar content, together with increases in water use efficiency (WUE), water potential, chlorophyll content, and fluorescence quantum efficiency, compared to the untreated plants under drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1387 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought, 1-MCP increased water use efficiency, water potential, and chlorophyll content versus untreated plants.

Taxon
cotton plantsGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
water use efficiency (WUE), water potential, chlorophyll contente0
Direction
increasese0
Qualifier
under droughte0
Comparator
untreated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 1-MCP caused reductions of lipid peroxidation, membrane leakage, and soluble sugar content, together with increases in water use efficiency (WUE), water potential, chlorophyll content, and fluorescence quantum efficiency, compared to the untreated plants under drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1387 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought, 1-MCP increased fluorescence quantum efficiency versus untreated plants.

Taxon
cotton plantsGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
fluorescence quantum efficiencye0
Direction
increasese0
Qualifier
under droughte0
Comparator
untreated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 1-MCP caused reductions of lipid peroxidation, membrane leakage, and soluble sugar content, together with increases in water use efficiency (WUE), water potential, chlorophyll content, and fluorescence quantum efficiency, compared to the untreated plants under drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1387 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–74 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that 1-MCP has potential to delay cotton senescence under heat, drought, and aging.

Taxon
cotton plantsGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
delay senescencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1-MCP treatment of cotton should have the potential to delay senescence under heat and drought stress, and the aging process”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1535–1659 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP was more effective under stress than nonstress conditions.

Taxon
cotton plantsGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
more effectivee0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
non-stress conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1-MCP is more effective under stress than under non-stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1675–1744 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–74 · show in text ↑

1-methylcyclopropene · physiology: oxidative · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · physiology: photosynthesis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · physiology: water · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.