Paper · 2010 · ˜The œjournal of cotton science/Journal of cotton science

1-Methylcyclopropene Effects on the Physiology and Yield of Field-Grown Cotton

Eduardo M. Kawakami; Derrick M. Oosterhuis; John L. Snider

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) is a major fiber crop; however, cotton yields are often limited due to its extreme sensitivity to environmental stress such as high temperature and drought. The current project was designed to evaluate the use of the plant growth regulator 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) to alleviate the adverse effect of environmental stress on cotton yields. Three field studies were conducted in Arkansas in 2006 and 2007. An untreated control was compared with 1-MCP at 10 g ai ha-1 applied at first flower (FF), and another applied at FF and again two weeks later. Measurements were made of boll weight, boll number and yield, as well as on plant physiological and biochemical responses. During the period of cotton fruit development, the maximum temperatures for Marianna, AR in 2006 and 2007 were well above the optimum 30oC temperature for cotton growth, indicating that cotton was under heat stress. Plants that received 1-MCP at FF and FF+2 weeks had significantly higher seed cotton and lint yields than the untreated control. This result was possibly due to a significant weight increase in 1-MCP treated bolls located in the middle of the plant canopy as no effect was observed on cotton fruit abscission. Applications of 1-MCP significantly decreased the stress levels of cotton plants as indicated by higher maximum quantum efficiency of Photosystem II and lower activity of the leaf antioxidant glutathione reductase. No 1-MCP effect on protein and malondialdehyde content in leaves was observed. The study showed that foliar application of 1-MCP has the potential to improve yields due to reduced plant stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum temperatures during fruit development exceeded the cotton optimum.

Outcome
maximum temperaturese0
Direction
well abovee0
Comparator
optimum 30oC temperaturee0
Setting
Marianna, ARe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maximum temperatures for Marianna, AR in 2006 and 2007 were well above the optimum 30oC temperature for cotton growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–874 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP increased seed cotton yield relative to untreated controls.

Treatment
1-MCP at FF and FF+2 weekse0
Outcome
seed cottone0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants that received 1-MCP at FF and FF+2 weeks had significantly higher seed cotton and lint yields than the untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1049 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP increased lint yield relative to untreated controls.

Treatment
1-MCP at FF and FF+2 weekse0
Outcome
lint yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants that received 1-MCP at FF and FF+2 weeks had significantly higher seed cotton and lint yields than the untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1049 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP increased weight of bolls in the middle canopy.

Organ / stage
bollse0
Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
weighte0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
middle of the plant canopye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a significant weight increase in 1-MCP treated bolls located in the middle of the plant canopy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1177 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP had no observed effect on cotton fruit abscission.

Treatment
1-MCPe1
Outcome
cotton fruit abscissione0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no effect was observed on cotton fruit abscission”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1230 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plants that received 1-MCP at FF and FF+2 weeks had significantly higher seed cotton and lint yields than the untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1049 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP increased maximum quantum efficiency of Photosystem II.

Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
maximum quantum efficiency of Photosystem IIe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applications of 1-MCP significantly decreased the stress levels of cotton plants as indicated by higher maximum quantum efficiency of Photosystem II”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1380 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP lowered leaf glutathione reductase activity.

Organ / stage
leafe0
Treatment
1-MCPe1
Gene
glutathione reductasee0
Outcome
activitye0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lower activity of the leaf antioxidant glutathione reductase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1385–1445 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
e1

“Applications of 1-MCP significantly decreased the stress levels of cotton plants as indicated by higher maximum quantum efficiency of Photosystem II”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1380 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP showed no observed effect on leaf protein content.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
proteine0
Direction
No 1-MCP effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No 1-MCP effect on protein and malondialdehyde content in leaves was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1447–1524 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP showed no observed effect on leaf malondialdehyde content.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
malondialdehyde contente0
Direction
No 1-MCP effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No 1-MCP effect on protein and malondialdehyde content in leaves was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1447–1524 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded foliar 1-MCP could improve yield by reducing plant stress.

Treatment
foliar application of 1-MCPe0
Outcome
improve yieldse0
Qualifier
has the potentiale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of 1-MCP has the potential to improve yields due to reduced plant stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1548–1639 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑

1-methylcyclopropene · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · physiology: oxidative · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · physiology: photosynthesis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · organism · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.