1-methylcyclopropene · Physiology: oxidative · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)
12 claims from these papers; 2 citations between them.
Papers whose results differ, checked claim by claim 3
3 pairs of papers on this question report results that differ: an effect in one paper, the opposite effect or no effect in the other. Two model reviewers reading both claims accepted each pair.
- Cotton Response to 1-Methylcyclopropene Under Different Light Regimes and Growth Stages: Lint Yield and Yield Components (2010)
no changeElectrolyte leakage did not differ statistically from untreated control.
Effect of 1-MCP on Cotton Plants Under Abiotic Stress (2013)decrease1-MCP reduced lipid peroxidation, membrane leakage and soluble sugar content in cotton under heat and drought stress in the growth chamber.
What separates themTest system: field · controlled environmentSituation: not stated · droughtCompare the two papers → - Cotton Response to 1-Methylcyclopropene Under Different Light Regimes and Growth Stages: Lint Yield and Yield Components (2010)
no changeElectrolyte leakage did not differ statistically from untreated control.
Ethylene-inhibiting compound 1-MCP delays leaf senescence in cotton plants under abiotic stress conditions (2015)decreaseUnder heat stress, 1-MCP reduced lipid peroxidation, membrane leakage, and soluble sugar content versus untreated plants.
What separates themTest system: field · controlled environmentSituation: not stated · heatCompare the two papers → - Cotton Response to 1-Methylcyclopropene Under Different Light Regimes and Growth Stages: Lint Yield and Yield Components (2010)
no changeElectrolyte leakage did not differ statistically from untreated control.
Ethylene-inhibiting compound 1-MCP delays leaf senescence in cotton plants under abiotic stress conditions (2015)decreaseUnder heat, 1-MCP reduced lipid peroxidation, membrane leakage and soluble sugar content.
What separates themTest system: field · controlled environmentCompare the two papers →
How these papers cite each other
2 citations between these papers: 1 on the same side, 1 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 5
Effect of 1-MCP on Cotton Plants Under Abiotic Stress · 2013
- positive
Effect of 1-MCP on Boll Development and Subtending Leaves of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Plants · 2014
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 3
- no effect
- no effect
1-Methylcyclopropene Effects on the Physiology and Yield of Field-Grown Cotton · 2010
- no effect
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.