Paper · 2013 · OakTrust (Texas A&M University Libraries)

Effect of 1-MCP on Cotton Plants Under Abiotic Stress

Yuan Chen

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Many environmental stress factors have been identified that increase square and boll abscission and thus result in reduced cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) yield. Under stress conditions, ethylene, an endogenous hormone, is elicited. Ethylene peaks before abscission to promote the formation of the abscission layer and plays a major role in early season square and boll abortion. In addition, ethylene stimulates the leaf senescence process. Thus, it is desirable to protect a crop from ethylene-induced fruit loss and premature leaf senescence under stress conditions. The overall objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that the ethylene inhibiting compound 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) treatment can have a beneficial effect on the physiology, biochemistry and yield traits of cotton plants under abiotic stress conditions under field and controlled environment studies. The growth chamber studies were conducted in 2011 using a randomized complete design with six replications. Cotton plants were exposed to stress conditions (heat and drought) and 1-MCP treatment at the seven-true-leaf stage. The heat stress study consisted of two 1-MCP rates (0 and 10 g a.i. ha-1) and two temperature regimes (optimum temperature: 30/20 ºC (day/night temperature) and high temperature: 40/25 ºC). The drought study consisted of two water regimes (well-watered and water-stressed) was exposed to two rates of 1-MCP (0 and 10 g a.i. ha-1). Both of the field studies were conducted with a randomized complete block design with four replications in 2010 and 2011 at the Texas A&M AgriLIFE Research Farm in Burleson County, TX. The objective of the first field study was to evaluate the ability of 1-MCP to protect cotton plants against abiotic stress imposed by a foliar treatment of ethephon. Eight treatments consisted of two 1-MCP rates (0 and 10 g a.i. ha-1) in combination of four ethephon rates (0, 146, 292, and 438 mL ha-1) were imposed at the first flower (FF) stage of crop development. The second field study investigated the effect of 1-MCP on boll development and the corresponding subtending leaves, and consisted of two 1-MCP rates (0 and 10 g a.i. ha-1) applied at 20 days after flowering. In the growth chamber study examining heat and drought, application of 1-MCP resulted in reductions of lipid peroxidation, membrane leakage, and soluble sugar content as well as increased chlorophyll content, compared to the untreated plants under stress conditions. In the field study to evaluate the effect of 1-MCP under ethephon stress, 1-MCP increased plant height and number of main stem nodes in both years. In addition, 1-MCP treated plants exhibited greater membrane integrity and increased photosystem II quantum efficiency, and thus delayed senescence in both years. This potential for yield increase was realized in 2011 with 1-MCP treatment exhibiting a higher lint yield. In 2012, although 1-MCP treatment increased number of open fruit and open fruit weight per plant, no significant yield increase was detected. In the field study to test the effect of 1-MCP on boll development and subtending leaf conditions, 1-MCP treatment increased cotton boll weight at 20 days after flowering. One probable explanation for the enhanced boll size was the healthier subtending leaves: 1-MCP-treated subtending leaves exhibited decreased membrane damage and lipid peroxidation, and higher chlorophyll content and photosynthetic efficiency.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP reduced lipid peroxidation, membrane leakage and soluble sugar content in cotton under heat and drought stress in the growth chamber.

Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
lipid peroxidation, membrane leakage, and soluble sugar contente0
Direction
reductionse0
Qualifier
heat and droughte0
Comparator
untreated plantse0
Setting
growth chambere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“In the growth chamber study examining heat and drought, application of 1-MCP resulted in reductions of lipid peroxidation, membrane leakage, and soluble sugar content as well as increased chlorophyll content, compared to the untreated plants under stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2204–2469 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP increased chlorophyll content in cotton under heat and drought stress in the growth chamber.

Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
heat and droughte0
Comparator
untreated plantse0
Setting
growth chambere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“In the growth chamber study examining heat and drought, application of 1-MCP resulted in reductions of lipid peroxidation, membrane leakage, and soluble sugar content as well as increased chlorophyll content, compared to the untreated plants under stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2204–2469 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP increased plant height and number of main stem nodes under ethephon stress in both years.

Treatment
1-MCPe1
Outcome
plant height and number of main stem nodese1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
under ethephon stresse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–32 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the field study to evaluate the effect of 1-MCP under ethephon stress, 1-MCP increased plant height and number of main stem nodes in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2471–2617 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP treated plants had greater membrane integrity.

Treatment
1-MCP treated plantse2
Outcome
membrane integritye2
Direction
greatere2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–32 · show in text ↑
e2

“1-MCP treated plants exhibited greater membrane integrity and increased photosystem II quantum efficiency, and thus delayed senescence in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2632–2780 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP increased photosystem II quantum efficiency in cotton.

Treatment
1-MCP treated plantse2
Outcome
photosystem II quantum efficiencye2
Direction
increasede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–32 · show in text ↑
e2

“1-MCP treated plants exhibited greater membrane integrity and increased photosystem II quantum efficiency, and thus delayed senescence in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2632–2780 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP delayed senescence of cotton in both years.

Treatment
1-MCP treated plantse2
Outcome
senescencee2
Direction
delayede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–32 · show in text ↑
e2

“1-MCP treated plants exhibited greater membrane integrity and increased photosystem II quantum efficiency, and thus delayed senescence in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2632–2780 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1-MCP treatment had a higher lint yield in 2011.

Treatment
1-MCP treatmente3
Outcome
lint yielde3
Direction
highere3
Setting
2011e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–32 · show in text ↑
e3

“This potential for yield increase was realized in 2011 with 1-MCP treatment exhibiting a higher lint yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2782–2888 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2012, 1-MCP increased the number of open fruit and open fruit weight per plant.

Treatment
1-MCP treatmente4
Outcome
number of open fruit and open fruit weight per plante4
Direction
increasede4
Setting
2012e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–32 · show in text ↑
e4

“In 2012, although 1-MCP treatment increased number of open fruit and open fruit weight per plant, no significant yield increase was detected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2890–3030 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2012, no significant cotton yield increase was detected with 1-MCP.

Treatment
1-MCP treatmente4
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
no significant yield increasee4
Setting
2012e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–32 · show in text ↑
e4

“In 2012, although 1-MCP treatment increased number of open fruit and open fruit weight per plant, no significant yield increase was detected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2890–3030 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP increased cotton boll weight at 20 days after flowering.

Treatment
1-MCP treatmente5
Outcome
cotton boll weighte5
Direction
increasede5
Qualifier
at 20 days after floweringe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–32 · show in text ↑
e5

“In the field study to test the effect of 1-MCP on boll development and subtending leaf conditions, 1-MCP treatment increased cotton boll weight at 20 days after flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3032–3202 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The enhanced boll size under 1-MCP is probably explained by healthier subtending leaves.

Outcome
enhanced boll sizee6
Qualifier
healthier subtending leavese6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–32 · show in text ↑
e6

“One probable explanation for the enhanced boll size was the healthier subtending leaves: 1-MCP-treated subtending leaves exhibited decreased membrane damage and lipid peroxidation, and higher chlorophyll content and photosynthetic efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3204–3445 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP-treated subtending leaves had decreased membrane damage and lipid peroxidation.

Organ / stage
subtending leavese6
Treatment
1-MCP-treated subtending leavese6
Outcome
membrane damage and lipid peroxidatione6
Direction
decreasede6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–32 · show in text ↑
e6

“One probable explanation for the enhanced boll size was the healthier subtending leaves: 1-MCP-treated subtending leaves exhibited decreased membrane damage and lipid peroxidation, and higher chlorophyll content and photosynthetic efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3204–3445 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP-treated subtending leaves had higher chlorophyll content and photosynthetic efficiency.

Organ / stage
subtending leavese6
Treatment
1-MCP-treated subtending leavese6
Outcome
higher chlorophyll content and photosynthetic efficiencye6
Direction
highere6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–32 · show in text ↑
e6

“One probable explanation for the enhanced boll size was the healthier subtending leaves: 1-MCP-treated subtending leaves exhibited decreased membrane damage and lipid peroxidation, and higher chlorophyll content and photosynthetic efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3204–3445 · show in text ↑

1-methylcyclopropene · physiology: pigments · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · physiology: oxidative · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.