Paper · 2010

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND PHYSIOLOGY 1-Methylcyclopropene Effects on the Physiology and Yield of Field-Grown Cotton

Eduardo M. Kawakami; Derrick M. Oosterhuis; John L. Snider

7
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) is a major fiber crop; however, cotton yields are often limited due to its extreme sensitivity to environmental stress such as high temperature and drought. t he current project was designed to evaluate the use of the plant growth regulator 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) to alleviate the adverse effect of environmental stress on cotton yields. Three field studies were conducted in Arkansas in 2006 and 2007. An untreated control was compared with 1-MCP at 10 g ai ha -1 applied at first flower (FF), and another applied at FF and again two weeks later. Measure ments were made of boll weight, boll number and yield, as well as on plant physiological and biochemical responses. During the period of cotton fruit development, the maximum temperatures for Marianna, AR in 2006 and 2007 were well above the optimum 30 o C temperature for cotton growth, indicating that cotton was under heat stress. Plants that received 1-MCP at FF and FF+2 weeks had significantly higher seed cotton and lint yields than the untreated control. This result was possibly due to a significant weight increase in 1-MCP treated bolls located in the middle of the plant canopy as no effect was observed on cotton fruit abscission. Applications of 1-MCP significantly decreased the stress levels of cotton plants as indicated by higher maximum quantum efficiency of Photosystem II and lower activity of the leaf antioxidant glutathione reductase. No 1-MCP effect on protein and malondialdehyde content in leaves was observed. The study showed that foliar application of 1-MCP has the potential to improve yields due to reduced plant stress. T

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum temperatures exceeded the cotton growth optimum during fruit development.

Outcome
maximum temperaturese0
Direction
well abovee0
Value
30 o Ce0
Setting
Marianna, ARe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum temperatures for Marianna, AR in 2006 and 2007 were well above the optimum 30 o C temperature for cotton growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–880 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP at both flowering times increased seed cotton and lint yields relative to untreated plants.

Treatment
1-MCP at FF and FF+2 weekse0
Outcome
seed cotton and lint yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants that received 1-MCP at FF and FF+2 weeks had significantly higher seed cotton and lint yields than the untreated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1056 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP increased weight of bolls in the middle canopy.

Organ / stage
bollse0
Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
weighte0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
middle of the plant canopye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant weight increase in 1-MCP treated bolls located in the middle of the plant canopy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1183 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No effect on cotton fruit abscission was observed.

Outcome
fruit abscissione0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no effect was observed on cotton fruit abscission”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1236 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP raised maximum quantum efficiency of Photosystem II.

Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
maximum quantum efficiency of Photosystem IIe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applications of 1-MCP significantly decreased the stress levels of cotton plants as indicated by higher maximum quantum efficiency of Photosystem II and lower activity of the leaf antioxidant glutathione reductase.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1452 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP lowered leaf glutathione reductase activity.

Treatment
1-MCPe0
Gene
glutathione reductasee0
Outcome
activity of the leaf antioxidant glutathione reductasee0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applications of 1-MCP significantly decreased the stress levels of cotton plants as indicated by higher maximum quantum efficiency of Photosystem II and lower activity of the leaf antioxidant glutathione reductase.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1452 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP did not affect leaf protein and malondialdehyde content.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
protein and malondialdehyde contente0
Direction
No 1-MCP effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No 1-MCP effect on protein and malondialdehyde content in leaves was observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1453–1531 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–111 · show in text ↑

1-methylcyclopropene · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · physiology: oxidative · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · physiology: photosynthesis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.