Paper · 2022 · KOREAN JOURNAL OF PACKAGING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

Growth of Non-Powered Hydroponics Equipment and Quality Characteristics according to Post-Harvest Packaging by Cultural Methods on Leaf Lettuce

국립원예특작과학원; Jung-Soo Lee

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The research was aimed to improve pre-harvest methods to maintain marketability in postharvest leaf lettuce. In this study, the effect of hydroponics on the growth and post-harvest storage characteristics of ‘Chongchima’ lettuce grown in peat mass medium hydroponic system using a non-powered culture device or deep water culture (DWC) was evaluated. There was no difference in fresh weight, leaf number, SPAD, moisture content, and C/N ratio between peat moss growing medium hydroponic and DWC methods except plant height. It was found that lettuce cultivation by a nonpowered hydroponics method is easier than the existing DWC. The quality parameters, such as fresh weight loss, SPAD value, and general appearance of lettuce were investigated after harvest. There was no significant difference in fresh weight loss and general appearance during storage of lettuce by the hydroponics methods. However, with the increased storage time of SPAD, which is related to chlorophyll content, was slightly higher in peat moss medium hydroponic was than DWC. When crops such as lettuce are grown under favorable conditions without any agronomic abnormalities, it is suggested that post-harvest storage is not significantly affected by peat moss growing medium hydroponic and DWC.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peat moss hydroponic and DWC lettuce showed no difference in fresh weight, leaf number and SPAD

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Material
Chongchimae0
Treatment
peat moss growing medium hydroponice1
Outcome
fresh weight, leaf number, SPADe1
Direction
no differencee1
Comparator
DWCe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘Chongchima’ lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–228 · show in text ↑
e1

“There was no difference in fresh weight, leaf number, SPAD, moisture content, and C/N ratio between peat moss growing medium hydroponic and DWC methods except plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 351–522 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peat moss hydroponic and DWC lettuce showed no difference in moisture content and C/N ratio

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Material
Chongchimae0
Treatment
peat moss growing medium hydroponice1
Outcome
moisture content, and C/N ratioe1
Direction
no differencee1
Comparator
DWCe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘Chongchima’ lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–228 · show in text ↑
e1

“There was no difference in fresh weight, leaf number, SPAD, moisture content, and C/N ratio between peat moss growing medium hydroponic and DWC methods except plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 351–522 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height differed between peat moss hydroponic and DWC lettuce

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Material
Chongchimae0
Treatment
peat moss growing medium hydroponice1
Outcome
plant heighte1
Comparator
DWCe1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘Chongchima’ lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–228 · show in text ↑
e1

“There was no difference in fresh weight, leaf number, SPAD, moisture content, and C/N ratio between peat moss growing medium hydroponic and DWC methods except plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 351–522 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fresh weight loss and general appearance of lettuce did not differ significantly during storage between the hydroponic methods

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae2
Treatment
hydroponics methodse2
Outcome
fresh weight loss and general appearancee2
Direction
no significant differencee2
Qualifier
during storagee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“There was no significant difference in fresh weight loss and general appearance during storage of lettuce by the hydroponics methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–892 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SPAD during storage was slightly higher in peat moss hydroponic lettuce than in DWC lettuce

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Material
Chongchimae0
Treatment
peat moss medium hydroponice3
Outcome
SPADe3
Direction
highere3
Qualifier
with the increased storage timee3
Comparator
DWCe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘Chongchima’ lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–228 · show in text ↑
e3

“with the increased storage time of SPAD, which is related to chlorophyll content, was slightly higher in peat moss medium hydroponic was than DWC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–1048 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-powered hydroponic lettuce cultivation is easier than the existing DWC method

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae4
Outcome
lettuce cultivatione4
Direction
easiere4
Comparator
the existing DWCe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“It was found that lettuce cultivation by a nonpowered hydroponics method is easier than the existing DWC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–628 · show in text ↑

in vitro · quality: grain · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

in vitro · physiology: pigments · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

cultivation system · quality: grain · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

cultivation system · quality: postharvest · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

cultivation system · physiology: pigments · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

growing medium · physiology: pigments · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 6 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.