Paper · 2012 · Compost Science & Utilization

Evaluation of Growth Media Incorporating Cotton Ginning By-products for Vegetable Production

E.M. Khah; S.A. Petropoulos; I.C. Karapanos; et al.

5
claims
12
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The suitability of by-products from the cotton ginning industry for incorporation into growth media for three vegetable crops was examined. Composts were prepared by mixing the by-product with soil in 5 ratios (20:80, 40:60, 60:40, 80:20, 100:0, v/v compost and soil). Seeds of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.), radish (Raphanus sativus L.) and spinach (Spinacia oleraceae L.) were sown directly within the composts and in 100% peat (control) in October (autumn crop) and December (winter crop). Plant growth (height, leaf number, dry and fresh weight, chlorophyll content) was recorded 19 and 17 days after transplantation (first and second sowing respectively) and at harvest. Fresh and dry weight was recorded at harvest. Overall, plant height and leaf number were higher when the growth media consisted principally of compost (higher ratios of cotton by-product: soil) than in the control (peat), whereas among the various ratios of compost: soil significant differences were recorded, media with a high compost content showing better growth in most cases. Similar results were reported for fresh and dry weight and chlorophyll content, except for dry weight in the second sowing, where growth media with a lower compost content had a higher dry weight. In conclusion, the incorporation of the cotton ginning by-product into compost resulted in better growth of lettuce, spinach and radish, suggesting that the use of this material may be of economical value as a spin-off product for the cotton ginning plant and also as a means of reducing present pollution of the environment due to the accumulation of waste material.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High compost growth media increased plant height and leaf number relative to peat.

Taxon
lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.), radish (Raphanus sativus L.) and spinach (Spinacia oleraceae L.)Spinacia oleraceaRaphanus sativusLactuca sativae1
Treatment
growth media consisted principally of composte0
Outcome
plant height and leaf numbere0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
control (peat)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant height and leaf number were higher when the growth media consisted principally of compost (higher ratios of cotton by-product: soil) than in the control (peat)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–894 · show in text ↑
e1

“lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.), radish (Raphanus sativus L.) and spinach (Spinacia oleraceae L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–371 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High compost media increased fresh and dry weight in most cases relative to peat.

Taxon
lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.), radish (Raphanus sativus L.) and spinach (Spinacia oleraceae L.)Spinacia oleraceaRaphanus sativusLactuca sativae2
Treatment
growth media consisted principally of composte1
Outcome
fresh and dry weighte0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
except for dry weight in the second sowinge0
Comparator
control (peat)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similar results were reported for fresh and dry weight and chlorophyll content, except for dry weight in the second sowing, where growth media with a lower compost content had a higher dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1251 · show in text ↑
e1

“plant height and leaf number were higher when the growth media consisted principally of compost (higher ratios of cotton by-product: soil) than in the control (peat)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–894 · show in text ↑
e2

“lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.), radish (Raphanus sativus L.) and spinach (Spinacia oleraceae L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–371 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High compost media increased chlorophyll content in most cases.

Taxon
lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.), radish (Raphanus sativus L.) and spinach (Spinacia oleraceae L.)Spinacia oleraceaRaphanus sativusLactuca sativae2
Treatment
growth media consisted principally of composte1
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
highere1
Comparator
control (peat)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similar results were reported for fresh and dry weight and chlorophyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1134 · show in text ↑
e1

“plant height and leaf number were higher when the growth media consisted principally of compost (higher ratios of cotton by-product: soil) than in the control (peat)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–894 · show in text ↑
e2

“lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.), radish (Raphanus sativus L.) and spinach (Spinacia oleraceae L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–371 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower compost content gave higher dry weight in the second sowing.

Taxon
lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.), radish (Raphanus sativus L.) and spinach (Spinacia oleraceae L.)Spinacia oleraceaRaphanus sativusLactuca sativae1
Treatment
growth media with a lower compost contente0
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
second sowinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dry weight in the second sowing, where growth media with a lower compost content had a higher dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1251 · show in text ↑
e1

“lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.), radish (Raphanus sativus L.) and spinach (Spinacia oleraceae L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–371 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest cotton ginning byproduct compost for vegetable growing.

Outcome
the use of this material may be of economical valuee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of this material may be of economical value as a spin-off product for the cotton ginning plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1406–1508 · show in text ↑
e1

“better growth of lettuce, spinach and radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1344–1388 · show in text ↑

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results differ

41 papers: 37 positive, 4 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

in vitro · physiology: pigments · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

in vitro · physiology: pigments · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

in vitro · growth · Raphanus sativus (radish)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 6 positive, 4 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Raphanus sativus (radish)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

in vitro · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 28 positive, 5 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

fertilization · growth · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

79 papers: 71 positive, 8 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.