Paper · 2022 · Archives of Agriculture Sciences Journal/Archives of Agriculture Sciences Journal

Effect of some chemical preservatives and storage condition on phytochemical components and antioxidant activity of some fruit pulp

Souzan Latif; H. Abd El-aal; S. Hussein; et al.

8
claims
13
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of some chemical preservatives such as sodium benzoate (SB), potassium sorbate (PS) and citric acid (CA) on phytochemical components and antioxidant activity for mango, guava and apricot pulp during storage period at ambient temperature (25±4 ℃). The phytochemical constituents such as total phenolic content, total Flavonoids, vitamin C, β-carotene were assessed the level of their concentrations for examine their antioxidant activity. In general, chemical preservatives (sodium benzoate, potassium sorbate, and citric acid) noticed that extend the storage period of fruit pulp products. All fruit pulp samples under study were capable of scavenging activity DPPH. They showed a wide range 6.98-91.68% scavenging effects. The wide range and difference in antioxidant activity could be due to the different extractability of the antioxidant compounds were found in fruit pulp samples. It is important to note that the antioxidant activities were relatively correlated with the total phenolic contents and ascorbic acid. Phytochemical components and antioxidant activity were showed that significantly (p < 0.05) decreased in all treatments during storage period. Guava pulp showed the highest antioxidant activity, total phenolic and ascorbic acid contents. On the other side, mango pulp showed the highest total flavonoids and β-carotene, while apricot pulp showed the lowest in phytochemical components and antioxidant activity. Thus, chemical preservatives (sodium benzoate, potassium sorbate, and citric acid) were used to extend the storage period and maintain the quality of the products.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical preservatives (sodium benzoate, potassium sorbate, citric acid) extended the storage period of mango, guava and apricot pulp products.

Treatment
chemical preservativese2
Outcome
storage periode2
Direction
extende2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for mango, guava and apricot pulp during storage period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–262 · show in text ↑
e2

“chemical preservatives (sodium benzoate, potassium sorbate, and citric acid) noticed that extend the storage period of fruit pulp products”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–637 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phytochemical components and antioxidant activity decreased significantly in all treatments during storage.

Treatment
storage periode5
Outcome
Phytochemical components and antioxidant activitye5
Direction
decreasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for mango, guava and apricot pulp during storage period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–262 · show in text ↑
e5

“Phytochemical components and antioxidant activity were showed that significantly (p < 0.05) decreased in all treatments during storage period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1211 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antioxidant activities were relatively correlated with total phenolic contents and ascorbic acid in the fruit pulps.

Compound
total phenolic contents and ascorbic acide4
Outcome
antioxidant activitiese4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for mango, guava and apricot pulp during storage period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–262 · show in text ↑
e4

“the antioxidant activities were relatively correlated with the total phenolic contents and ascorbic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1068 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All fruit pulp samples scavenged DPPH, with scavenging effects of 6.98-91.68%.

Outcome
scavenging activity DPPHe3
Value
6.98-91.68%e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for mango, guava and apricot pulp during storage period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–262 · show in text ↑
e3

“were capable of scavenging activity DPPH. They showed a wide range 6.98-91.68%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–752 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Guava pulp showed the highest antioxidant activity, total phenolic and ascorbic acid contents.

Outcome
antioxidant activity, total phenolic and ascorbic acid contentse6
Direction
higheste6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Guava pulp showed the highest antioxidant activity, total phenolic and ascorbic acid contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1306 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mango pulp showed the highest total flavonoids and beta-carotene.

Outcome
total flavonoids and β-carotenee7
Direction
higheste7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“mango pulp showed the highest total flavonoids and β-carotene”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1388 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apricot pulp showed the lowest phytochemical components and antioxidant activity.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacae1
Outcome
phytochemical components and antioxidant activitye1
Direction
loweste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“apricot pulp showed the lowest in phytochemical components and antioxidant activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1396–1479 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical preservatives were used to extend storage and maintain the quality of the fruit pulp products.

Treatment
chemical preservativese1
Outcome
quality of the productse1
Direction
maintaine1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for mango, guava and apricot pulp during storage period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–262 · show in text ↑
e1

“chemical preservatives (sodium benzoate, potassium sorbate, and citric acid) were used to extend the storage period and maintain the quality of the products”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1643 · show in text ↑

storage · quality: phytochemicals · Prunus armeniaca (apricot)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

storage · quality: phytochemicals · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 8 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

storage · quality: phytochemicals · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 23 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.