Paper · 2022 · Annals of Agricultural Sciences

Salinity tolerance determination in four sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) hybrids using yield parameters and principal components analysis model

Gabriel Céccoli; Sergio Andrés Granados Ortiz; Melina Soledad Buttarelli; et al.

9
claims
23
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Globally, around 800 million hectares are affected by salinity. This abiotic stress causes plant growth inhibition, disruptions in physiological processes in plant cells, and yield losses in many crops. Sunflower is the third-most oilseed crop globally produced, and it is considered moderately tolerant to salinity. There are few studies about the genotypic variability existing in sunflower for responses to salinity, especially the changes in yield and oil content and quality under salinity. The present work aimed to study the effects of salinity on achene yield in four sunflower genotypes and their components and on the oil content and quality and their relationships. Four sunflower hybrids (ACA885, TRITON MAX, SRM769 and SRM779) were grown at 130 mM NaCl irrigation solution under controlled environmental conditions. The achene yield, the yield components, and the content and oil quality were determined. Based on the four studied genotypes, salinity decreased achene yield by 75.1 %. SRM779CL had a lower achene yield reduction by salinity. Yield component that most explained this tolerance was the number of achenes per plant. SRM779CL was the hybrid with the highest oil percentage loss. Contrarily, salinity increased the oil content in ACA885. Salinity decreased the ratio between oleic (18:1) and linoleic acid (18:2) in all genotypes. Therefore, salt stress increased the percentage of unsaturations in the four genotypes examined in this work. Finally, considering the 12 parameters measured, principal components analysis could determine that SRM779CL showed the best performance under control conditions while ACA885 was the most tolerant under salinity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity decreased sunflower achene yield by 75.1%.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
achene yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
75.1 %e0
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Based on the four studied genotypes, salinity decreased achene yield by 75.1 %.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–997 · show in text ↑
t0

“four sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–81 · show in text ↑
e2

“under control conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1603–1627 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRM779CL had a smaller salinity-related achene yield reduction.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Material
SRM779CLe0
Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
achene yield reductione0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SRM779CL had a lower achene yield reduction by salinity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1054 · show in text ↑
t0

“four sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–81 · show in text ↑
e2

“under control conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1603–1627 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Achene number per plant explained the tolerance of SRM779CL.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Outcome
number of achenes per plante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield component that most explained this tolerance was the number of achenes per plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1142 · show in text ↑
t0

“four sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRM779CL had the highest oil percentage loss.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Material
SRM779CLe0
Outcome
oil percentage losse0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SRM779CL was the hybrid with the highest oil percentage loss.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1204 · show in text ↑
t0

“four sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity increased oil content in ACA885.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Material
ACA885e0
Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
oil contente0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Contrarily, salinity increased the oil content in ACA885.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1262 · show in text ↑
t0

“four sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–81 · show in text ↑
e2

“under control conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1603–1627 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity decreased the oleic to linoleic acid ratio in all genotypes.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
Salinitye0
Outcome
ratio between oleic (18:1) and linoleic acid (18:2)e0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salinity decreased the ratio between oleic (18:1) and linoleic acid (18:2) in all genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1355 · show in text ↑
t0

“four sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–81 · show in text ↑
e2

“under control conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1603–1627 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress increased oil unsaturation percentage in the four genotypes.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
salt stresse0
Outcome
percentage of unsaturationse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“salt stress increased the percentage of unsaturations in the four genotypes examined in this work.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1367–1465 · show in text ↑
t0

“four sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–81 · show in text ↑
e2

“under control conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1603–1627 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PCA identified SRM779CL as best under control conditions.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Material
SRM779CLe0
Outcome
best performancee0
Comparator
control conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SRM779CL showed the best performance under control conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1566–1627 · show in text ↑
t0

“four sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PCA identified ACA885 as most salinity tolerant.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Material
ACA885e0
Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
most tolerante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ACA885 was the most tolerant under salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1634–1677 · show in text ↑
t0

“four sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–81 · show in text ↑

salinity · quality: oil · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results differ

8 papers: 1 positive, 7 negative or no effect

7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

salinity · yield · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results differ

24 papers: 2 positive, 22 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.