Paper · 2022 · International Journal of Plant & Soil Science

Post Flowering Management Using Plant Growth Regulators in Greengram (Vigna radiata L.)

B. Kesava Priya; S. Panneerselvam; S. Marimuthu; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Aim: The study was conducted to evaluate the effect of Auxin and Zeatin-based nanoformulations in post-flowering management in greengram. Place and Duration of Study: Nanoformulations were standardized at the Department of Nano Science and Technology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore and a field trial was carried out at Agricultural Research Station, Bhavanisagar. Methodology: Nanoformulations were standardized by oil in water nanoemulsion technique and effect on crop is observed by foliar spray of nanoformulations during the flowering stage of crop growth. Results: Increased chlorophyll content due to NAA and Zeatin and extended retention of chlorophyll in Auxin-based treatments has been recorded. Hence the crop can produce more assimilates leading to increased seed yield. Zeatin spray also recorded increased chlorophyll, mature pods, number of seeds pod-1, seed weight, pod setting percentage. Such an increase of yield attributes was mainly due to decreased flower shedding percentage. Conclusion: Growth regulators such as Auxin and Zeatin exhibited a significant role in increasing plant chlorophyll content and yield of greengram. Among treatments, Nanoemulsion of NAA @ 30ppm recorded a higher number of mature pods, seed yield, seed weight and lower flower shedding percentage which is concluded as the best treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA increased greengram chlorophyll content.

Treatment
NAAe0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
Increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increased chlorophyll content due to NAA and Zeatin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–638 · show in text ↑
t0

“Greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zeatin increased greengram chlorophyll content.

Treatment
Zeatine0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
Increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increased chlorophyll content due to NAA and Zeatin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–638 · show in text ↑
t0

“Greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Auxin treatments extended chlorophyll retention.

Treatment
Auxin-based treatmentse0
Outcome
retention of chlorophylle0
Direction
extendede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“extended retention of chlorophyll in Auxin-based treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–702 · show in text ↑
t0

“Greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zeatin spray increased mature pods, seeds per pod and seed weight.

Treatment
Zeatin spraye0
Outcome
mature pods, number of seeds pod-1, seed weighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zeatin spray also recorded increased chlorophyll, mature pods, number of seeds pod-1, seed weight, pod setting percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–920 · show in text ↑
t0

“Greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zeatin spray increased pod setting percentage.

Treatment
Zeatin spraye0
Outcome
pod setting percentagee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zeatin spray also recorded increased chlorophyll, mature pods, number of seeds pod-1, seed weight, pod setting percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–920 · show in text ↑
t0

“Greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–68 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower flower shedding was proposed to explain increased yield attributes.

Outcome
yield attributese0
Qualifier
decreased flower shedding percentagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Such an increase of yield attributes was mainly due to decreased flower shedding percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1013 · show in text ↑
t0

“Greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA nanoemulsion at 30 ppm increased mature pod number.

Treatment
Nanoemulsion of NAA @ 30ppme0
Outcome
number of mature podse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nanoemulsion of NAA @ 30ppm recorded a higher number of mature pods, seed yield, seed weight and lower flower shedding percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1310 · show in text ↑
t0

“Greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA nanoemulsion at 30 ppm increased seed yield.

Treatment
Nanoemulsion of NAA @ 30ppme0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nanoemulsion of NAA @ 30ppm recorded a higher number of mature pods, seed yield, seed weight and lower flower shedding percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1310 · show in text ↑
t0

“Greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA nanoemulsion at 30 ppm increased seed weight.

Treatment
Nanoemulsion of NAA @ 30ppme0
Outcome
seed weighte0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nanoemulsion of NAA @ 30ppm recorded a higher number of mature pods, seed yield, seed weight and lower flower shedding percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1310 · show in text ↑
t0

“Greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA nanoemulsion at 30 ppm reduced flower shedding.

Treatment
Nanoemulsion of NAA @ 30ppme0
Outcome
flower shedding percentagee0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nanoemulsion of NAA @ 30ppm recorded a higher number of mature pods, seed yield, seed weight and lower flower shedding percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1310 · show in text ↑
t0

“Greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–68 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors selected NAA nanoemulsion at 30 ppm as the best treatment.

Treatment
Nanoemulsion of NAA @ 30ppme0
Outcome
best treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nanoemulsion of NAA @ 30ppm recorded a higher number of mature pods, seed yield, seed weight and lower flower shedding percentage which is concluded as the best treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1351 · show in text ↑
t0

“Greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–68 · show in text ↑

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · physiology: pigments · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

application · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

216 papers: 209 positive, 7 negative or no effect

208 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

212 papers more in this group

See all 216 papers →

class · physiology: pigments · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

26 papers: 26 positive, 0 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.