Paper · 2023 · Agronomy Journal

Diversifying corn production systems with living mulches in the southeastern United States

Marcia P. Quinby; Renata L. G. Nave; Nicholas S. Hill; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Living mulch (LM) production systems are gaining traction as an alternative to the use of annual cover crops in the southeastern United States, warranting research on the viability and functionality of this system. Our objective was to evaluate the benefits of LM in corn silage and grain production and to evaluate the potential of LM grazing during the corn ( Zea Mays L.) growing season. The experiment was conducted in Spring Hill, TN in 2020 and 2021 and consisted of two mulch species, white clover (WC) ( Trifolium repens L.) and a mixture of crimson clover ( Trifolium incarnatum L.) and cereal rye (CCCR) ( Secale cereale L.). Cull cows were used for the grazing periods (4 weeks before planting and after the harvest of corn). The study evaluated the botanical composition, mulch mass, nutritive value, corn silage and grain production, and cow average daily weight gain (ADG). The WC treatment had a greater weed control than CCCR. In 2020, when differences in mulch mass were observed, CCCR had greater mass than WC mass due to the weed presence. Meanwhile, in 2021, the mulch mass did not differ between WC and CCCR, with both treatments showing less mass in spring and early summer. Grain production was 30% less than silage in 2020 and 90% less in 2021. The ADG was only observed for WC (0.5 kg −1 ) paddocks. It was concluded that WC as LM has greater corn production than CCCR treatments. The LM for grazing is a beneficial strategy if feeding costs are greater than $2.22 head day −1 .

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

White clover provided greater weed control than the clover rye mixture.

Treatment
WCe0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed controle0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
CCCRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The WC treatment had a greater weed control than CCCR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–950 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–17 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The clover rye mulch had greater mass in 2020 because weeds were present.

Treatment
CCCRe0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
mulch masse0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
WCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2020, when differences in mulch mass were observed, CCCR had greater mass than WC mass due to the weed presence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1066 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–17 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two mulches did not differ in mass in 2021.

Treatment
WCe0
Outcome
mulch masse0
Direction
did not differe0
Comparator
CCCRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in 2021, the mulch mass did not differ between WC and CCCR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1137 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–17 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both mulch treatments had less mass in spring and early summer.

Organ / stage
spring and early summere0
Outcome
masse0
Direction
lesse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both treatments showing less mass in spring and early summer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1204 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–17 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain production was 30% less than silage in 2020.

Outcome
Grain productione0
Direction
lesse0
Value
30%e0
Qualifier
2020e0
Comparator
silagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain production was 30% less than silage in 2020”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1255 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–17 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain production was 90% less than silage in 2021.

Outcome
Grain productione0
Direction
lesse0
Value
90%e0
Qualifier
2021e0
Comparator
silagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain production was 30% less than silage in 2020 and 90% less in 2021”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1276 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–17 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cow daily gain in white clover paddocks was 0.5 kg.

Outcome
ADGe0
Value
0.5 kg −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ADG was only observed for WC (0.5 kg −1 ) paddocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1332 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–17 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

White clover living mulch yielded greater corn production than the clover rye mixture.

Treatment
WC as LMe0
Outcome
corn productione0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
CCCRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“WC as LM has greater corn production than CCCR treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1356–1413 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–17 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Living mulch grazing was considered beneficial above a stated feeding cost.

Outcome
LM for grazinge0
Qualifier
feeding costs are greater than $2.22 head day −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“LM for grazing is a beneficial strategy if feeding costs are greater than $2.22 head day −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1419–1510 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–17 · show in text ↑

Trifolium repens · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Trifolium repens · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

cover crop · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

222 papers: 104 positive, 118 negative or no effect

103 papers in the same direction as this paper · 104 in the opposite direction · 14 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

218 papers more in this group

See all 222 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.