Paper · 2017 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Efficacy of crop establishment techniques and weed control measures on weed dynamics, weed control efficiency and productivity in rice (Oryza sativa)

M H ANSARI; R A YADAV; M Z SIDDIQUI; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

The field experiment was conducted during kharif season 2013 and 2014 at C S Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh to assess the performance of four rice establishment techniques and four weed control measures on weed dynamics, weed control efficiency, productivity and profitability of rice. Weed dynamics were higher in direct seeded rice (DSR) as compared to transplanted rice (TPR). The highest total weed density (214-282 plants/m2) and total weed biomass (40.5-52.2 g/m2) were recorded in DSR while the lowest in TPR. The efficacy of Sesbania brown manuring was significantly higher in both DSR and TPR. Compared with the weedy plots, two hand weeding at 20 DAS/DAT and 45 DAS/DAT followed by Bispyribac sodium 25 g/ha + (Chlorimuron + metsulfuron) 4 g/ha followed by one hand weeding at 45 DAS/DAT provided significant weed control. In both seasons, weed control efficacy was better in DSR and TPR. Across the weed control measures, the mean weed control efficiency ranged from 59.8 -98.6% and 64.2-98.5% at 30 DAS and maturity stage, respectively. TPR produced the maximum rice grain yields. On an average of both years, weed control treatments produced 21 to 43% higher rice grain yield than the weedy plots.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed dynamics were higher in direct seeded rice than in transplanted rice.

Treatment
direct seeded rice (DSR)e0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
Weed dynamicse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
transplanted rice (TPR)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–149 · show in text ↑
e0

“Weed dynamics were higher in direct seeded rice (DSR) as compared to transplanted rice (TPR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–416 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total weed density was highest in direct seeded rice and lowest in transplanted rice.

Treatment
DSRe1
Interactor
weede1weed
Outcome
total weed densitye1
Direction
higheste1
Value
214-282 plants/m2e1
Comparator
TPRe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–149 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest total weed density (214-282 plants/m2) and total weed biomass (40.5-52.2 g/m2) were recorded in DSR while the lowest in TPR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–553 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total weed biomass was highest in direct seeded rice and lowest in transplanted rice.

Treatment
DSRe1
Interactor
weede1weed
Outcome
total weed biomasse1
Direction
higheste1
Value
40.5-52.2 g/m2e1
Comparator
TPRe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–149 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest total weed density (214-282 plants/m2) and total weed biomass (40.5-52.2 g/m2) were recorded in DSR while the lowest in TPR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–553 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sesbania brown manuring gave significantly higher weed control efficacy in both direct seeded and transplanted rice.

Treatment
Sesbania brown manuringe2
Outcome
efficacye2
Direction
highere2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–149 · show in text ↑
e2

“The efficacy of Sesbania brown manuring was significantly higher in both DSR and TPR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–639 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hand weedings followed by Bispyribac sodium plus Chlorimuron and metsulfuron and one more hand weeding provided significant weed control compared with weedy plots.

Treatment
Bispyribac sodium 25 g/ha + (Chlorimuron + metsulfuron) 4 g/hae3
Outcome
weed controle3
Comparator
weedy plotse3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–149 · show in text ↑
e3

“Compared with the weedy plots, two hand weeding at 20 DAS/DAT and 45 DAS/DAT followed by Bispyribac sodium 25 g/ha + (Chlorimuron + metsulfuron) 4 g/ha followed by one hand weeding at 45 DAS/DAT provided significant weed control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–869 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed control efficacy was better in direct seeded and transplanted rice in both seasons.

Treatment
DSR and TPRe4
Outcome
weed control efficacye4
Direction
bettere4
Setting
both seasonse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–149 · show in text ↑
e4

“In both seasons, weed control efficacy was better in DSR and TPR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–935 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean weed control efficiency ranged from 59.8 -98.6% at 30 DAS.

Outcome
mean weed control efficiencye5
Value
59.8 -98.6%e5
Qualifier
30 DASe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–149 · show in text ↑
e5

“Across the weed control measures, the mean weed control efficiency ranged from 59.8 -98.6% and 64.2-98.5% at 30 DAS and maturity stage, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1085 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean weed control efficiency ranged from 64.2-98.5% at maturity stage.

Organ / stage
maturity stagee5
Outcome
mean weed control efficiencye5
Value
64.2-98.5%e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–149 · show in text ↑
e5

“Across the weed control measures, the mean weed control efficiency ranged from 59.8 -98.6% and 64.2-98.5% at 30 DAS and maturity stage, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1085 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplanted rice produced the maximum rice grain yields.

Treatment
TPRe6
Outcome
rice grain yieldse6
Direction
maximume6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–149 · show in text ↑
e6

“TPR produced the maximum rice grain yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed control treatments produced 21 to 43% higher rice grain yield than weedy plots.

Treatment
weed control treatmentse7
Outcome
rice grain yielde7
Direction
highere7
Value
21 to 43%e7
Comparator
weedy plotse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–149 · show in text ↑
e7

“On an average of both years, weed control treatments produced 21 to 43% higher rice grain yield than the weedy plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1247 · show in text ↑

chlorimuron · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

bispyribac-sodium · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

153 papers: 149 positive, 4 negative or no effect

148 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
    Total weed population and dry weight under bispyribac-sodium at 25 g/ha were at par with the higher doses.

    Evaluation of bispyribac-sodium in transplanted rice · 2013 · compared with higher doses of bispyribac-sodium at 35 and 50 g/ha

    No difference from an alternative

149 papers more in this group

See all 153 papers →

metsulfuron methyl · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

43 papers: 43 positive, 0 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

transplanting · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

146 papers: 129 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 129 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

142 papers more in this group

See all 146 papers →

herbicide · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

802 papers: 725 positive, 77 negative or no effect

724 papers in the same direction as this paper · 57 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

798 papers more in this group

See all 802 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.