Paper · 2022 · Madras Agricultural Journal

Effect of Post-Emergence Herbicidal Combinations Tank Mixed with Zinc or/and Iron Sulphate on Weed Index and Economics in Wheat Crop (Triticum aestivum)

Jitender bhakar; Amarjeet A; Pradeep Kumar; et al.

5
claims
13
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Wheat (Triticum aestivum) is second most important staple crop in India after rice. Weeds have emerged as the major biotic stress in wheat. Post-emergence herbicidal combinations are used widely to control the complex weed flora in wheat crops. Over the past decades, micronutrient deficiency has emerged as major constraint in wheat production, especially zinc and iron. The field experiment was conducted at RRS, Bawal, Haryana, during Rabi season of 2018-19. The experiment was conducted in a randomized block design having 3 replications; each having 18 treatments. Four herbicidal combinations were evaluated as sole and tank mixed with zinc or/and iron sulphate. Weedy check and weed free were maintained throughout the experiment. The weed index was calculated from the yield of weed free and respective treatment yield. Economic evaluation was made in terms of gross returns, net returns, and benefit-cost ratio. Results of experiment revealed that application of mesosulfuron + iodosulfuron @ 14.4 gha-1 was most effective herbicidal combination among the tested herbicidal combinations and yielded lowest weed index. Tank mixing of micronutrients with herbicidal combinations further lowered down the weed index and even negative values were obtained. Tank mixing of herbicidal combinations with micronutrients was more economical than application of sole herbicidal combinations. Highest net returns and benefit cost ratio was recorded under mesosulfuron + iodosulfuron @ 14.4 gha-1 + ZnSO4 (0.5 %) + Urea (2.5 %) + FeSO4 (0.5 %) followed by sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron @ 32 gha-1 + ZnSO4 (0.5 %) + Urea (2.5 %) + FeSO4 (0.5 %).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mesosulfuron + iodosulfuron at 14.4 gha-1 was the most effective herbicide combination and gave the lowest weed index in wheat.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
mesosulfuron + iodosulfuron @ 14.4 gha-1e3
Interactor
Weedse1weed
Outcome
weed indexe3
Direction
loweste3
Comparator
tested herbicidal combinationse3
Setting
RRS, Bawal, Haryanae2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum) is second most important staple crop in India after rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–82 · show in text ↑
e1

“Weeds have emerged as the major biotic stress in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 84–138 · show in text ↑
e2

“The field experiment was conducted at RRS, Bawal, Haryana, during Rabi season of 2018-19”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–460 · show in text ↑
e3

“application of mesosulfuron + iodosulfuron @ 14.4 gha-1 was most effective herbicidal combination among the tested herbicidal combinations and yielded lowest weed index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tank mixing micronutrients with herbicide combinations further lowered the weed index, even to negative values, in wheat.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
Tank mixing of micronutrients with herbicidal combinationse4
Outcome
weed indexe4
Direction
lowered downe4
Qualifier
even negative values were obtainede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum) is second most important staple crop in India after rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–82 · show in text ↑
e4

“Tank mixing of micronutrients with herbicidal combinations further lowered down the weed index and even negative values were obtained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1260 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tank mixing herbicide combinations with micronutrients was more economical than sole herbicide combinations in wheat.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
Tank mixing of herbicidal combinations with micronutrientse5
Outcome
economicale5
Direction
more economicale5
Comparator
sole herbicidal combinationse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum) is second most important staple crop in India after rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–82 · show in text ↑
e5

“Tank mixing of herbicidal combinations with micronutrients was more economical than application of sole herbicidal combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1389 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mesosulfuron + iodosulfuron with ZnSO4, urea and FeSO4 gave the highest net returns and benefit cost ratio.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
mesosulfuron + iodosulfuron @ 14.4 gha-1 + ZnSO4 (0.5 %) + Urea (2.5 %) + FeSO4 (0.5 %)e6
Outcome
Highest net returns and benefit cost ratioe6
Direction
Higheste6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum) is second most important staple crop in India after rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–82 · show in text ↑
e6

“Highest net returns and benefit cost ratio was recorded under mesosulfuron + iodosulfuron @ 14.4 gha-1 + ZnSO4 (0.5 %) + Urea (2.5 %) + FeSO4 (0.5 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1391–1540 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron with ZnSO4, urea and FeSO4 ranked second for net returns and benefit cost ratio in wheat.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron @ 32 gha-1 + ZnSO4 (0.5 %) + Urea (2.5 %) + FeSO4 (0.5 %)e7
Outcome
net returns and benefit cost ratioe6
Direction
followed bye7
Comparator
mesosulfuron + iodosulfuron @ 14.4 gha-1 + ZnSO4 (0.5 %) + Urea (2.5 %) + FeSO4 (0.5 %)e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum) is second most important staple crop in India after rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–82 · show in text ↑
e6

“Highest net returns and benefit cost ratio was recorded under mesosulfuron + iodosulfuron @ 14.4 gha-1 + ZnSO4 (0.5 %) + Urea (2.5 %) + FeSO4 (0.5 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1391–1540 · show in text ↑
e7

“followed by sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron @ 32 gha-1 + ZnSO4 (0.5 %) + Urea (2.5 %) + FeSO4 (0.5 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1541–1638 · show in text ↑

zinc sulfate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

100 papers: 98 positive, 2 negative or no effect

97 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

96 papers more in this group

See all 100 papers →

metsulfuron methyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

155 papers: 143 positive, 12 negative or no effect

142 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    The mixture gave similar wheat grain yield to sequential application and weed-free conditions.

    Bio-efficacy of ready-mix formulation of clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfuron for control of mixed weed flora in wheat · 2015 · compared with sequential application of clodinafop 60 g/ha and metsulfuron 4 g/ha and weed free

    No difference from an alternativeCited by this paper

  2. positive
  3. negative

151 papers more in this group

See all 155 papers →

iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous) · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

herbicide · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

401 papers: 362 positive, 39 negative or no effect

361 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

397 papers more in this group

See all 401 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.