Paper · 2017 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Impact of drip irrigation and N-fertigation scheduling on wheat (Triticum aestivum) under semi-arid tropical environment

SACHIN HIMMATRAO MALVE; PRAVEEN RAO V; ANIL DHAKE

10
claims
18
verbatim quotes
7
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

The efficient use of water by modern irrigation systems is becoming increasingly important in arid and semi-arid regions with limited water resources. A field experiment was conducted at Jain Hi-Tech. Agri. Institute, Jalgaon, Maharashtra during rabi season of 2012-13 and 2013-14, to study the impact of drip irrigation and N-fertigation scheduling on growth and yield of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). The results revealed that all growth traits, yield components, grain and straw yield of wheat increased significantly at each higher levels of drip irrigation up to DI - 1.0 Epan with water application of 511 and 446 mm and fertigation of 120 kg N/ha in both the years. The highest water productivity was recorded with 0.8 Epan and N160 in both the years of study. The predicted maximum grain yield was 4838 kg/ha in the 2012-13 with an input level of 171.1 kg N/ha, 4451 kg/ha in the 2013-14 with an input level of 154.7 kg N/ha and 4642 kg/ha on pooled basis with an input level of 162.6 kg N/ha, respectively beyond which the yield decrease. However, the maximum grain yield (Ymax) in 2012-13 and on pooled basis was not bracketed within the tested range of nitrogen levels (0 to 160 kg/ha). The economic optima of N level that will maximize the net return under prevailing prices considered above worked out to be 156.8 kg N/ha with the resultant grain yield of 4640 kg/ha.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat growth traits increased significantly with higher drip irrigation through DI - 1.0 Epan and 120 kg N/ha fertigation.

Treatment
drip irrigation up to DI - 1.0 Epane0
Outcome
all growth traitse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
each higher levels of drip irrigatione0

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all growth traits, yield components, grain and straw yield of wheat increased significantly at each higher levels of drip irrigation up to DI - 1.0 Epan with water application of 511 and 446 mm and fertigation of 120 kg N/ha in both the years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–678 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield components increased significantly with higher drip irrigation.

Treatment
drip irrigation up to DI - 1.0 Epane0
Outcome
yield componentse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
each higher levels of drip irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all growth traits, yield components, grain and straw yield of wheat increased significantly at each higher levels of drip irrigation up to DI - 1.0 Epan with water application of 511 and 446 mm and fertigation of 120 kg N/ha in both the years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–678 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain yield increased significantly with higher drip irrigation.

Treatment
drip irrigation up to DI - 1.0 Epane0
Outcome
grain and straw yield of wheate0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
each higher levels of drip irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all growth traits, yield components, grain and straw yield of wheat increased significantly at each higher levels of drip irrigation up to DI - 1.0 Epan with water application of 511 and 446 mm and fertigation of 120 kg N/ha in both the years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–678 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat straw yield increased significantly with higher drip irrigation.

Treatment
drip irrigation up to DI - 1.0 Epane0
Outcome
grain and straw yield of wheate0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
each higher levels of drip irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all growth traits, yield components, grain and straw yield of wheat increased significantly at each higher levels of drip irrigation up to DI - 1.0 Epan with water application of 511 and 446 mm and fertigation of 120 kg N/ha in both the years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–678 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Highest water productivity occurred with 0.8 Epan and N160 in both years.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
0.8 Epan and N160e0
Outcome
water productivitye0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest water productivity was recorded with 0.8 Epan and N160 in both the years of study.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–774 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–408 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Predicted maximum grain yield in 2012-13 was 4838 kg/ha at 171.1 kg N/ha.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
171.1 kg N/hae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
4838 kg/hae0
Qualifier
2012-13e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The predicted maximum grain yield was 4838 kg/ha in the 2012-13 with an input level of 171.1 kg N/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–875 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–408 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Predicted maximum grain yield in 2013-14 was 4451 kg/ha at 154.7 kg N/ha.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
154.7 kg N/hae0
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
maximume1
Value
4451 kg/hae0
Qualifier
2013-14e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“4451 kg/ha in the 2013-14 with an input level of 154.7 kg N/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–939 · show in text ↑
e1

“The predicted maximum grain yield was 4838 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–823 · show in text ↑
e2

“winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–408 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Pooled predicted maximum grain yield was 4642 kg/ha at 162.6 kg N/ha.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
162.6 kg N/hae0
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
maximume1
Value
4642 kg/hae0
Qualifier
pooled basise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“4642 kg/ha on pooled basis with an input level of 162.6 kg N/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1007 · show in text ↑
e1

“The predicted maximum grain yield was 4838 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–823 · show in text ↑
e2

“winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–408 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum grain yield in 2012-13 and pooled analysis lay beyond the tested nitrogen range.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Outcome
maximum grain yield (Ymax)e0
Qualifier
not bracketed within the tested range of nitrogen levels (0 to 160 kg/ha)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maximum grain yield (Ymax) in 2012-13 and on pooled basis was not bracketed within the tested range of nitrogen levels (0 to 160 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1203 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–408 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The economic nitrogen optimum was 156.8 kg N/ha with resultant grain yield of 4640 kg/ha.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Outcome
economic optima of N levele0
Value
156.8 kg N/hae0
Qualifier
resultant grain yield of 4640 kg/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The economic optima of N level that will maximize the net return under prevailing prices considered above worked out to be 156.8 kg N/ha with the resultant grain yield of 4640 kg/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1387 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–408 · show in text ↑

irrigation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

242 papers: 177 positive, 65 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this paper · 61 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

238 papers more in this group

See all 242 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.