Abstract
The efficient use of water by modern irrigation systems is becoming increasingly important in arid and semi-arid regions with limited water resources. A field experiment was conducted at Jain Hi-Tech. Agri. Institute, Jalgaon, Maharashtra during rabi season of 2012-13 and 2013-14, to study the impact of drip irrigation and N-fertigation scheduling on growth and yield of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). The results revealed that all growth traits, yield components, grain and straw yield of wheat increased significantly at each higher levels of drip irrigation up to DI - 1.0 Epan with water application of 511 and 446 mm and fertigation of 120 kg N/ha in both the years. The highest water productivity was recorded with 0.8 Epan and N160 in both the years of study. The predicted maximum grain yield was 4838 kg/ha in the 2012-13 with an input level of 171.1 kg N/ha, 4451 kg/ha in the 2013-14 with an input level of 154.7 kg N/ha and 4642 kg/ha on pooled basis with an input level of 162.6 kg N/ha, respectively beyond which the yield decrease. However, the maximum grain yield (Ymax) in 2012-13 and on pooled basis was not bracketed within the tested range of nitrogen levels (0 to 160 kg/ha). The economic optima of N level that will maximize the net return under prevailing prices considered above worked out to be 156.8 kg N/ha with the resultant grain yield of 4640 kg/ha.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat growth traits increased significantly with higher drip irrigation through DI - 1.0 Epan and 120 kg N/ha fertigation.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- drip irrigation up to DI - 1.0 Epane0
- Outcome
- all growth traitse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- each higher levels of drip irrigatione0
Not reportedSetting
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“all growth traits, yield components, grain and straw yield of wheat increased significantly at each higher levels of drip irrigation up to DI - 1.0 Epan with water application of 511 and 446 mm and fertigation of 120 kg N/ha in both the years”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat yield components increased significantly with higher drip irrigation.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- drip irrigation up to DI - 1.0 Epane0
- Outcome
- yield componentse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- each higher levels of drip irrigatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“all growth traits, yield components, grain and straw yield of wheat increased significantly at each higher levels of drip irrigation up to DI - 1.0 Epan with water application of 511 and 446 mm and fertigation of 120 kg N/ha in both the years”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat grain yield increased significantly with higher drip irrigation.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- drip irrigation up to DI - 1.0 Epane0
- Outcome
- grain and straw yield of wheate0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- each higher levels of drip irrigatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“all growth traits, yield components, grain and straw yield of wheat increased significantly at each higher levels of drip irrigation up to DI - 1.0 Epan with water application of 511 and 446 mm and fertigation of 120 kg N/ha in both the years”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat straw yield increased significantly with higher drip irrigation.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- drip irrigation up to DI - 1.0 Epane0
- Outcome
- grain and straw yield of wheate0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- each higher levels of drip irrigatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“all growth traits, yield components, grain and straw yield of wheat increased significantly at each higher levels of drip irrigation up to DI - 1.0 Epan with water application of 511 and 446 mm and fertigation of 120 kg N/ha in both the years”
Claim · model-written summary
Highest water productivity occurred with 0.8 Epan and N160 in both years.
- Taxon
- winter wheat
Triticum aestivume1 - Treatment
- 0.8 Epan and N160e0
- Outcome
- water productivitye0
- Direction
- higheste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The highest water productivity was recorded with 0.8 Epan and N160 in both the years of study.”
e1“winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Predicted maximum grain yield in 2012-13 was 4838 kg/ha at 171.1 kg N/ha.
- Taxon
- winter wheat
Triticum aestivume1 - Treatment
- 171.1 kg N/hae0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 4838 kg/hae0
- Qualifier
- 2012-13e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The predicted maximum grain yield was 4838 kg/ha in the 2012-13 with an input level of 171.1 kg N/ha”
e1“winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Predicted maximum grain yield in 2013-14 was 4451 kg/ha at 154.7 kg N/ha.
- Taxon
- winter wheat
Triticum aestivume2 - Treatment
- 154.7 kg N/hae0
- Outcome
- grain yielde1
- Direction
- maximume1
- Value
- 4451 kg/hae0
- Qualifier
- 2013-14e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“4451 kg/ha in the 2013-14 with an input level of 154.7 kg N/ha”
e1“The predicted maximum grain yield was 4838 kg/ha”
e2“winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Pooled predicted maximum grain yield was 4642 kg/ha at 162.6 kg N/ha.
- Taxon
- winter wheat
Triticum aestivume2 - Treatment
- 162.6 kg N/hae0
- Outcome
- grain yielde1
- Direction
- maximume1
- Value
- 4642 kg/hae0
- Qualifier
- pooled basise0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“4642 kg/ha on pooled basis with an input level of 162.6 kg N/ha”
e1“The predicted maximum grain yield was 4838 kg/ha”
e2“winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Maximum grain yield in 2012-13 and pooled analysis lay beyond the tested nitrogen range.
- Taxon
- winter wheat
Triticum aestivume1 - Outcome
- maximum grain yield (Ymax)e0
- Qualifier
- not bracketed within the tested range of nitrogen levels (0 to 160 kg/ha)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the maximum grain yield (Ymax) in 2012-13 and on pooled basis was not bracketed within the tested range of nitrogen levels (0 to 160 kg/ha)”
e1“winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The economic nitrogen optimum was 156.8 kg N/ha with resultant grain yield of 4640 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- winter wheat
Triticum aestivume1 - Outcome
- economic optima of N levele0
- Value
- 156.8 kg N/hae0
- Qualifier
- resultant grain yield of 4640 kg/hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The economic optima of N level that will maximize the net return under prevailing prices considered above worked out to be 156.8 kg N/ha with the resultant grain yield of 4640 kg/ha.”
e1“winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
176 papers in the same direction as this paper · 61 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- negative
238 papers more in this group
See all 242 papers →irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
985 papers more in this group
See all 989 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.