Abstract
Field trials for two seasons (2020-2021 and 2021-2022) were conducted to investigate the influence of canal water, agricultural drainage water, and different concentrations of silver nanoparticles (AgNO3NPs) (0, 60 and 75 ppm), humic acid (0,6 and 8 kg/fed) and sulphur (0, 200 and 400 kg/fed) on yield, quality characteristics, and production of sugar beet under the conditions of the salt-affected soil. Each field experiment included two factors in a split-plot design with three replications. The main plots were assigned to water irrigation treatments; whereas the rates of soil amendment (silver nanoparticles, sulfur, and humic acid) were arranged randomly within the sub-plots. Each subplot included six ridges which were 0.50 m apart and 3.50 m in length; so, the area of each subplot was 10.50 m2 (1/400 fed.). The most important results revealed that the canal water led to significant improvements in all traits of root yield, top yield, quality, gross yield, and pure sugar. In addition, increasing soil amendment (sulfur, humic acid, and silver nanoparticle) fertilization decreased significantly potassium (%), -α amino nitrogen (%), and sodium (%) in sugar beet root; however, the highest mean values of the sugar yield, and white sugar yield were recorded under the irrigation with canal water or drainage water with the application of 75ppm silver nanoparticles Meanwhile the lowest previous mentioned characters were obtained under irrigation with drainage water and control treatment (without any addition of soil amendments), during the two seasons. This showed that soil amendments (sulphur, humic acid, and silver nanoparticles) fertilization and irrigation treatment acts dependently on the sugar yield of the sugar beet plant under this study.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Canal water significantly improved root yield, top yield and quality.
- Taxon
- Sugar Beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- canal watere0
- Outcome
- root yield, top yield, qualitye0
- Direction
- improvementse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the canal water led to significant improvements in all traits of root yield, top yield, quality, gross yield, and pure sugar”
t0“Sugar Beet”
Claim · model-written summary
Canal water significantly improved gross yield and pure sugar.
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- canal watere0
- Outcome
- gross yield, and pure sugare0
- Direction
- improvementse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the canal water led to significant improvements in all traits of root yield, top yield, quality, gross yield, and pure sugar”
t0“Sugar Beet”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing sulfur amendment significantly reduced root potassium, alpha amino nitrogen and sodium percentages.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Organ / stage
- roote0
- Treatment
- sulfure0
- Outcome
- potassium (%), -α amino nitrogen (%), and sodium (%)e0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“increasing soil amendment (sulfur, humic acid, and silver nanoparticle) fertilization decreased significantly potassium (%), -α amino nitrogen (%), and sodium (%) in sugar beet root”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing humic acid significantly reduced root potassium, alpha amino nitrogen and sodium percentages.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Organ / stage
- roote0
- Treatment
- humic acide0
- Outcome
- potassium (%), -α amino nitrogen (%), and sodium (%)e0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“increasing soil amendment (sulfur, humic acid, and silver nanoparticle) fertilization decreased significantly potassium (%), -α amino nitrogen (%), and sodium (%) in sugar beet root”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing silver nanoparticle amendment significantly reduced root potassium, alpha amino nitrogen and sodium percentages.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Organ / stage
- roote0
- Treatment
- silver nanoparticlee0
- Outcome
- potassium (%), -α amino nitrogen (%), and sodium (%)e0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“increasing soil amendment (sulfur, humic acid, and silver nanoparticle) fertilization decreased significantly potassium (%), -α amino nitrogen (%), and sodium (%) in sugar beet root”
Claim · model-written summary
Canal irrigation with 75ppm silver nanoparticles gave highest sugar and white sugar yields.
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- 75ppm silver nanoparticlese0
- Outcome
- sugar yield, and white sugar yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Qualifier
- irrigation with canal watere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the highest mean values of the sugar yield, and white sugar yield were recorded under the irrigation with canal water or drainage water with the application of 75ppm silver nanoparticles”
t0“Sugar Beet”
Claim · model-written summary
Drainage irrigation with 75ppm silver nanoparticles gave highest sugar and white sugar yields.
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- 75ppm silver nanoparticlese0
- Outcome
- sugar yield, and white sugar yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Qualifier
- drainage watere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the highest mean values of the sugar yield, and white sugar yield were recorded under the irrigation with canal water or drainage water with the application of 75ppm silver nanoparticles”
t0“Sugar Beet”
Claim · model-written summary
Drainage irrigation without amendments gave lowest sugar and white sugar yields in both seasons.
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- irrigation with drainage water and control treatmente0
- Outcome
- sugar yield, and white sugar yielde1
- Direction
- loweste0
- Qualifier
- during the two seasonse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the lowest previous mentioned characters were obtained under irrigation with drainage water and control treatment (without any addition of soil amendments), during the two seasons.”
e1“sugar yield, and white sugar yield”
t0“Sugar Beet”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil amendments and irrigation acted dependently on sugar beet sugar yield.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Treatment
- soil amendments (sulphur, humic acid, and silver nanoparticles) fertilization and irrigation treatmente0
- Outcome
- sugar yielde0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“soil amendments (sulphur, humic acid, and silver nanoparticles) fertilization and irrigation treatment acts dependently on the sugar yield of the sugar beet plant under this study”
The same questions in other papers
sulfur atom · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
other · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →irrigation · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
40 papers more in this group
See all 44 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.