Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Humic acid reduced molasses forming substances content against control.

A claim from Impact of Humic Acid on Yield and Quality of Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.) Grown on Calcareous Soil · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid reduced molasses forming substances content against control.

Treatment
application of humic acide0
Outcome
molasses forming substances contente0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of humic acid caused a significant increase of sucrose, refined sugar, root yield and refined sugar yield and a reduction in molasses forming substances content, compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–1045
t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–55

Title

Impact of Humic Acid on Yield and Quality of Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.) Grown on Calcareous Soil

Ghorbanali RASSAM; Alireza DADKHAH; Asghar KHOSHNOOD YAZDI; et al. Notulae Scientia Biologicae 2015. doi:10.15835/nsb.7.3.9568

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-6cfa9db8fdfc8d757a3a53ee3d107eed321a2652ed3a30557bf4f448016baf69 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

other · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.