Abstract
Field studies were carried out in 2017–2019 in Research and Education Centre Brody, Poznań University of Life Sciences, in order to assessment the impact of tested adjuvants on weed control in sugar beet. Treatments included phenmedipham + ethofumesate at recommended quantity (F + E, 200 + 200 g/ha) + metamitron (M, 700 g/ha) and phenmedipham + ethofumesate at reduced quantities (140 + 140 g/ha) without or with tested methylated seed oil (MSO 1, 2, 3) and standard adjuvants. Herbicides were applied three times after weed emergence. MSO adjuvants were more effective to F + E + M applied at reduced rates than standard adjuvants. The MSO adjuvants made it possible to obtain high and stable herbicidal efficiency of herbicides, regardless of varied weather conditions during and after their application. The root yield of sugar beet after application of herbicides with test adjuvants was higher than on the control and after application of reduced rates of herbicides without adjuvants.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
MSO adjuvants were more effective with reduced herbicide rates than standard adjuvants.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- MSO adjuvantse0
- Outcome
- more effectivee0
- Direction
- more effectivee0
- Comparator
- standard adjuvantse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“MSO adjuvants were more effective to F + E + M applied at reduced rates than standard adjuvants”
t0“weed control in sugar beet”
Claim · model-written summary
MSO adjuvants enabled high and stable herbicidal efficiency across varied weather conditions.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- MSO adjuvantse0
- Outcome
- herbicidal efficiency of herbicidese0
- Direction
- high and stablee0
- Qualifier
- regardless of varied weather conditions during and after their applicatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The MSO adjuvants made it possible to obtain high and stable herbicidal efficiency of herbicides, regardless of varied weather conditions during and after their application”
t0“weed control in sugar beet”
Claim · model-written summary
Herbicides with test adjuvants yielded more sugar beet roots than the control.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0 - Treatment
- herbicides with test adjuvantse0
- Outcome
- root yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The root yield of sugar beet after application of herbicides with test adjuvants was higher than on the control”
Claim · model-written summary
Herbicides with test adjuvants yielded more sugar beet roots than reduced herbicide rates without adjuvants.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0 - Treatment
- herbicides with test adjuvantse0
- Outcome
- root yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- reduced rates of herbicides without adjuvantse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The root yield of sugar beet after application of herbicides with test adjuvants was higher than on the control and after application of reduced rates of herbicides without adjuvants”
The same questions in other papers
adjuvant · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
herbicide · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
50 papers more in this group
See all 54 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.